Who are your two fav commits of the class?

GeorgeFlippin

Heisman
May 29, 2001
38,559
35,537
113
Cameron Jurgens (Only In-state kid)

Dominick "MEGA" Watt (That's a HOLLYWOOD, FL) name if there ever was one!
 

huskerfan1414

Heisman
Oct 25, 2014
12,603
12,740
0
Many have mentioned Will Honas.
I will agree, especially as far as immediate impact goes.
Martinez is a huge one, too.
So is Washington..


But Honas will have the immediate impact.
 

TFrazier_rivals269992

All-Conference
Jun 8, 2001
7,429
3,298
0
Bill Moos
Scott Frost

Without the commitment from these two...who knows where Nebraska would be right now!!

 

WoodRiverJennings

All-American
Mar 4, 2013
7,313
5,136
113
Cameron Jurgens (Only In-state kid)

Dominick "MEGA" Watt (That's a HOLLYWOOD, FL) name if there ever was one!

Surprised that hasn't ruffled a few feathers in the TC crowd. What happens if there's only one scholarship player from Nebraska signed again next year?
 

WoodRiverJennings

All-American
Mar 4, 2013
7,313
5,136
113
Having a hard time choosing just two commits out of this class. HCSF & Co. killed it this year with limited time to salvage & fill the class.

I'll go with:

1A) Washington
1B) Greg Bell

Both of these dudes will be difference makers at RB.
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
My favorite is Maurice Washington. I love the idea of getting a top five I-back recruit signed and into the program. The other one is Greg Bell-- since Mike Rozier, I've also been a proponent for bringing in the best juco back you can find.

Next year, I do expect to see Bell and Washington leading the way in the Husker backfield. Ozigbo and Wilbon have had ample opportunities against far worse competition to prove themselves. I don't expect them to do it now.
 

NU_FTW

Senior
Nov 30, 2017
590
569
0
My favorite is Maurice Washington. I love the idea of getting a top five I-back recruit signed and into the program. The other one is Greg Bell-- since Mike Rozier, I've also been a proponent for bringing in the best juco back you can find.

Next year, I do expect to see Bell and Washington leading the way in the Husker backfield. Ozigbo and Wilbon have had ample opportunities against far worse competition to prove themselves. I don't expect them to do it now.
Im for whoever wins it. Perhaps with some proper coaching Ozigbo and Wilbon will be much improved. Though i do expect to see Bell, if Washington inst better than all 3 i dont see a reason to burn his redshirt. No need to force kids to give up an extra year of learning a system and developing unless they win the job.
 

GeorgeFlippin

Heisman
May 29, 2001
38,559
35,537
113
Surprised that hasn't ruffled a few feathers in the TC crowd. What happens if there's only one scholarship player from Nebraska signed again next year?
Actually, I think this year bodes well for a few more in state offers. I'll have to keep a close eye on players in Nebraska this coming season.
 

Gravitron

Junior
Aug 14, 2009
367
339
63
I'm not used to being this excited for a new class. On paper it seems we have a ton of future talent.

To my untrained eye, here is what I see:

Question Marks: LeGrone, M. Williams

Projects/Need time for development: Canty, Clark, Farniok, Alston, Hunt

Huge potential: Rogers, Wildeman, McGriff, Taylor, Watt, CJ Smith

Dynamic Now (could play next year): Martinez, M. Jones, Tannor, Washington

Instant Impact: Honas, Bell, Woodyard, C. Jones, D. Williams, Pickering, Jurgens
 
  • Like
Reactions: Headcard

Yolobomb

Senior
Oct 28, 2017
679
426
0
I'm not used to being this excited for a new class. On paper it seems we have a ton of future talent.

To my untrained eye, here is what I see:

Question Marks: LeGrone, M. Williams

Projects/Need time for development: Canty, Clark, Farniok, Alston, Hunt

Huge potential: Rogers, Wildeman, McGriff, Taylor, Watt, CJ Smith

Dynamic Now (could play next year): Martinez, M. Jones, Tannor, Washington

Instant Impact: Honas, Bell, Woodyard, C. Jones, D. Williams, Pickering, Jurgens

This would go great in the thread titled "How would you classify the signees"
 

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
I'm not used to being this excited for a new class. On paper it seems we have a ton of future talent.

To my untrained eye, here is what I see:

Question Marks: LeGrone, M. Williams

Projects/Need time for development: Canty, Clark, Farniok, Alston, Hunt

Huge potential: Rogers, Wildeman, McGriff, Taylor, Watt, CJ Smith

Dynamic Now (could play next year): Martinez, M. Jones, Tannor, Washington

Instant Impact: Honas, Bell, Woodyard, C. Jones, D. Williams, Pickering, Jurgens

McQuitty and Hunt are similar recruits on paper. McQuitty had a 5.8 rating opposed to Hunts 5.7. Their offer lists are different based on their location, but are comparable. There body types are similar. But last year, before the injury, McQuitty was going to be relied on for playing time and this year Hunt is a ‘need time for development’ guy.

I’m not saying I disagree. And maybe McQuitty was a much better recruit out of HS (I don’t know a ton about Hunt other than is recruiting profile). The long way to my point is, it is amazing how fast this staff changed the WR depth.
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
McQuitty and Hunt are similar recruits on paper. McQuitty had a 5.8 rating opposed to Hunts 5.7. Their offer lists are different based on their location, but are comparable. There body types are similar. But last year, before the injury, McQuitty was going to be relied on for playing time and this year Hunt is a ‘need time for development’ guy.

I’m not saying I disagree. And maybe McQuitty was a much better recruit out of HS (I don’t know a ton about Hunt other than is recruiting profile). The long way to my point is, it is amazing how fast this staff changed the WR depth.
McQuitty certainly had a lot more hype around here and his summer camp showing certainly impressed some people. Both about 6' and 4.7 range speed-- although those are summer camp times and I'm sure much faster times are reported for both. Very similar prospects.

That brings me to a great point I heard yesterday from one of the analysts. It's nice to see some guys like 6'5" McGriff and 6' 2" 233 lb. Legrone in this class. Better to have some different weapons in the offense rather than a bunch of guys who all look the same and do the same things.
 

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
McQuitty certainly had a lot more hype around here and his summer camp showing certainly impressed some people. Both about 6' and 4.7 range speed-- although those are summer camp times and I'm sure much faster times are reported for both. Very similar prospects.

That brings me to a great point I heard yesterday from one of the analysts. It's nice to see some guys like 6'5" McGriff and 6' 2" 233 lb. Legrone in this class. Better to have some different weapons in the offense rather than a bunch of guys who all look the same and do the same things.

This receiver corp needed size badly. We have some small shifty guys and we have some 6'-6'2 guys. But really nobody of any size. (Remember when BYU beat us a few seasons ago with a 6'5 and '6' WR?) I am extremely happy to see some guys with some height.

How fun would it be to see a goal line or short yardage package with McGriff (6'6), Jurgens (6'4), Allen (6'8) and Rafdal (6'7)?
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
This receiver corp needed size badly. We have some small shifty guys and we have some 6'-6'2 guys. But really nobody of any size. (Remember when BYU beat us a few seasons ago with a 6'5 and '6' WR?) I am extremely happy to see some guys with some height.

How fun would it be to see a goal line or short yardage package with McGriff (6'6), Jurgens (6'4), Allen (6'8) and Rafdal (6'7)?
I would love to see that. In the end, it's about winning games. That lineup there would be a ***** in the red zone. And it could happen given the simplicity of this offense and the coaches knowledge & experience with it. We haven't had that since the Solich era.

In the end, it's about winning football games. That lineup right there would be a nightmare for a DC to worry about. And while, some fans fret about how many stars McGriff had, what the coaches understand is that he is really big-- do I cover him with my 5'9" slot corner or a linebacker? To me, I love having that on my team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecisar

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
I would love to see that. In the end, it's about winning games. That lineup there would be a ***** in the red zone. And it could happen given the simplicity of this offense and the coaches knowledge & experience with it. We haven't had that since the Solich era.

In the end, it's about winning football games. That lineup right there would be a nightmare for a DC to worry about. And while, some fans fret about how many stars McGriff had, what the coaches understand is that he is really big-- do I cover him with my 5'9" slot corner or a linebacker? To me, I love having that on my team.

Agreed. Mismatches at the WR position is something we've missed for awhile (Reilly was 6'2 and he was our 'size' guy). The last WR that had some production and some height was Brandon Kinnie (at 6'3). Or Todd Peterson (at 6'4).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dean Pope