Vegas O/U for NU at 6

TwinsRRUs_rivals79748

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2011
6,818
4,193
0
If someone was to throw $100 at that bet and win, what is the payout?

I'd like to know as well.

Most of us here have high expectations and the projections are so bad that it makes your ask yourself what you are missing and whether you had too much red juice.

I am not a gambler/betting man. Never have been... but man, I would throw down some big money on the over.
 

19Football19

All-Conference
Dec 2, 2015
2,530
1,060
65
I'd like to know as well.

Most of us here have high expectations and the projections are so bad that it makes your ask yourself what you are missing and whether you had too much red juice.

I am not a gambler/betting man. Never have been... but man, I would throw down some big money on the over.

I think it's a lock but red juice usually prevails on this site.

I just read ESPN early "SR" and underclassmen NFL prospects ......we actually made it with a player. The last spot with Keron Williams. As for underclassmen we kept up with our reputation as "kicker U" with Josh B coming 4th.
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
Being reported by cornnation. Going to be an interesting season.
I think that's a bad line. If I was in Vegas, I would bet NU over six big. Seems like the worst you could do is a push. Much better chance of NU winning seven or eight than only winning five.

But if NU did win only six games, I wonder if that would create enough of a fire storm to lead to the firing of Riley, Dante Williams, Keith Williams, and staff? The schedule in 2018 will only get tougher.

I think the team could actually be better next year and even better in 2018, but not have in show up in won-loss record.
 

Cornicator

Hall of Famer
Feb 27, 2009
59,026
206,471
113
I think that's a bad line. If I was in Vegas, I would bet NU over six big. Seems like the worst you could do is a push. Much better chance of NU winning seven or eight than only winning five.

But if NU did win only six games, I wonder if that would create enough of a fire storm to lead to the firing of Riley, Dante Williams, Keith Williams, and staff? The schedule in 2018 will only get tougher.

I think the team could actually be better next year and even better in 2018, but not have in show up in won-loss record.

Maybe Vegas expects everyone to bet the over, and they're going to win big when it doesn't happen.
 

SilentCommit

Senior
Jun 19, 2013
1,145
716
0
My guess would be that Vegas sees a new QB and new defensive scheme. Each of those alone is typically worth 2-3 losses. A dispassionate view of our talent (think last year's bowl game, or Iowa) puts us as an average Big Ten team.
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,830
11,822
113
I could see this if it was Riley's first year in Lincoln but with a QB that fits his system Vegas has to be thinking the Defense isn't going to be very good this year to put the O/U at 6.
 
Last edited:

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,830
11,822
113
No, you pay 110 for a chance to win a hundred. They keep the 10 no matter what; they can balance the money or lay off risk - the 10 is where they make their money.
Like a toll bridge.

So you actually only win 90.:rolleyes:
 

mwulf

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2013
8,787
1,641
0
125 to win 100...its at -125 for the over -105 for the under....7.5 in my opinion would be a much more accurate line


Ohio St is set at 10.5 -200
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cloud_a_Heart
Aug 18, 2016
16,673
10,972
113
Put YOUR money where your mouth is on 6 wins or more, then.

Would me sayin I just put $200 on the over, really convince you I did?

I could just as easily bet you a $100 that Nebraska wins more than 6, then use YOUR money to bet on the Penn St and Iowa games.
 

Huskerpro

Senior
May 15, 2007
2,324
434
48
I think it's worth a sizable wager. My as* puckers on a $50 bet but I would be willing to put $500 on the over.

Ironically, I think the wildcard this year is defense even though we have a new qb.
 

percyland

Freshman
Apr 16, 2011
139
55
0
The way Vegas works is they want 50% to bet on over and 50% to bet on the under. I can only imagine right now people are betting heavy on the over so expect the line to bump up to 6.5 to 7 wins. I'll be in Vegas next week and if it's still 6 I'll be putting money on the huskers for over.

Still I bet seeing only 7 wins will make some busker fans uncomfortable. Although with that tough of a schedule it seems pretty plausible.
 

c3ntral08

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2008
4,370
1,815
0
This is the worst season total line I've ever seen. I'm looking for a bookie that will take a 1k bet on this. We have 4 wins locked in by just stepping off the bus; Ark St, NIU, Rutgers, and Illinois. Minny will not be good, Purdue either. So that should be 6 right there. We'll be favored by at least 6 vs NW @home, we'll be favored vs Iowa, possibly Wisky too. Vegas set this line because we lost a career passer in Tommy and lost our D coordinator and both of those are addition by subtraction. I will never post on this board ever again if Nebraska doesn't hit this over. Archive this!
 

HUSKERFAN66

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2004
21,419
3,724
113
No, you pay 110 for a chance to win a hundred. They keep the 10 no matter what; they can balance the money or lay off risk - the 10 is where they make their money. Like a toll bridge.
So I am guaranteeing a $10 loss if I say we win more than 6 games.
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,216
4,877
91
If our Oline improves and/or stays healthy, the over is a no-brainer. Vegas doesn't hit on every line.
 

Cornicator

Hall of Famer
Feb 27, 2009
59,026
206,471
113
I could see this if it was Riley's first year in Lincoln but with a QB that fits his system Vegas has to be thinking the Defense isn't going to be very good this year to put the O/U at 6.

First year for Riley O/U was 8, and they lost to Purdue, Illinois, and had home losses to BYU and Northwestern.

Perhaps Vegas is playing it safe.
 

chicolby

All-Conference
May 3, 2012
4,329
3,102
0
Look at losses:

Career statistic holder at QB breaking in a guy who barely completed over 50% at Tulane.

2 year starter a RB in Newby

Top 2 WR targets and general go-to guy in Westy

Top TE in Carter

Best defensive player in Gerry

New system being applied on D

We do have a solid FG kicker but a shaky punter.

Probably guaranteed 2 losses in Ohio State and Penn State. Probably underdog against Oregon and Wisconsin and Iowa. The margin for error is razor thin and God forbid if the team loses to a respectable Ark State, all hell could break loose.
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
As I pointed out yesterday in another thread-they missed big time(by more than 2 wins) on 5 teams in the B1G last year, and missed in slightly smaller numbers on 4 others. That's a lot of teams they missed on last year. So don't anybody talk about how accurate they usually are.
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,830
11,822
113
4 swing games that could make or break the season in my opinion are @ Oregon home against Wisconsin home against Northwestern and home against Iowa.

Obvious the Penn St and Ohio State games would be icing on the cake but more likely losses.

Vegas is betting we lose these 6. I don't believe we will.
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
Look at losses:

Career statistic holder at QB breaking in a guy who barely completed over 50% at Tulane.

2 year starter a RB in Newby

Top 2 WR targets and general go-to guy in Westy

Top TE in Carter

Best defensive player in Gerry

New system being applied on D

We do have a solid FG kicker but a shaky punter.

Probably guaranteed 2 losses in Ohio State and Penn State. Probably underdog against Oregon and Wisconsin and Iowa. The margin for error is razor thin and God forbid if the team loses to a respectable Ark State, all hell could break loose.
Says the person who wants to look at things as negatively as possible.