I propose a new rule.....

[Russ Wheeler]

If any poster calls into question the credibility or value of another poster based on anything other than the content of the post in which they are replying, the targeted poster can challenge them to a ‘who is the better poster’ poll. The loser is banned. The challenging poster must refer or quote the post that sparked the challenge in the poll. The moderator doing the banning chooses if it’s permanent or temporary. It’s not about the ban anyway, it’s about the shame of being considered worse than the person you are criticizing.

Sound halfway interesting?

 

[Maroon Eagle]

Give it a Wrestling Loser Leaves Town angle with the proviso that $20 to the Contribution Fund wil allow that person to be named Stagger Lee for the duration.

 

[KeyserSoze1999]

+1

View attachment 18608

 

[Felonious Junk]

Must include ACT scores

 

[Jeffreauxdawg]

View attachment 18609

 

[Willow Grove Dawg]

JWS say “Third Grade CAT scores”

 

[PineGroveBully]

I made a 93 all while staying up til 5 am playing James Bond Goldeneye on N64 so if yall are gonna bring it it had better be brought****

 

[karlchilders.sixpack]

The JR vs C34 rule?

??

 

[ronpolk]

If any poster calls into question the credibility or value of another poster based on anything other than the content of the post in which they are replying, the targeted poster can challenge them to a ‘who is the better poster’ poll. The loser is banned. The challenging poster must refer or quote the post that sparked the challenge in the poll. The moderator doing the banning chooses if it’s permanent or temporary. It’s not about the ban anyway, it’s about the shame of being considered worse than the person you are criticizing.

Sound halfway interesting?

Isn’t this like your 50th username, goat? You trying to go through a new name each week?

 

[Apoplectic_Objurgator]

Assign it a number so that it shall
heretofore be only referred to by its assignment

 

[karlchilders.sixpack]

This shat ain't gonna happen.

 

[olblue.sixpack]

Sound halfway interesting?

No

 

[mstateglfr]

Sound halfway interesting?

By way of your post- you suck, Goat v16.2

 

[Trojanbulldog19]

I propose most of those posters join the other message board because they think anyone who criticizes a coach or the coaches offense is a troll, drunk, stupid, hasn’t played football, not true maroon, or whatever. There are a plethora of guys over there like that. Most of the same ones that post the same **** here. Maybe they should just stay over there

 

[Russ Wheeler]

By way of your post- you suck, Goat v16.2

Care to be challenged to a poll, Mr. Downvote? I don't want you to commit suicide if you lose, though, I know how much image means to you. But I guess it would hurt the Riden for Biden vote in Iowa.

What do you say?

 

[Go Budaw]

If you want to see more people banned, just wait a little bit longer. There is going to be a SPS record for banishment numbers in a week starting about 36 hours from right now.

 

[DesotoCountyDawg]

They would do like you and pick another username. What’s the point.

 

[Russ Wheeler]

They would do like you and pick another username. What’s the point.

Ultimately the point is that people will quit criticizing folks like Dawg61 for his left lane driving or whatever, and instead judge the post. At least they wouldn't do it as quickly. Might actually have decent conversation.

 

[DesotoCountyDawg]

It wouldn’t change a thing other than a flood of new usernames.

 

[mcdawg22]

It wouldn’t change a thing other than a flood of new usernames.

As Shakespeare once famously said:
”A ****** poster by any another name would still be ******.” Or something like that.

 

[Russ Wheeler]

As Shakespeare once famously said:
”A ****** poster by any another name would still be ******.” Or something like that.

Well at least we would know for sure. It would be by a vote of the whole board, rather than a single moderator or two.

 

[GloryDawg]

I propose most of those posters join the other message board because they think anyone who criticizes a coach or the coaches offense is a troll, drunk, stupid, hasn’t played football, not true maroon, or whatever. There are a plethora of guys over there like that. Most of the same ones that post the same **** here. Maybe they should just stay over there

Nothing wrong criticizing but calling for a coach to be fired after only coaching five games is really stupid.

 

[Trojanbulldog19]

Nothing wrong criticizing but calling for a coach to be fired after only coaching five games is really stupid.

I will admit firing is premature and a lot of that is frustration from stubbornness from the coach and just pure lack of any offense whatsoever after one game. The offense worked one game and its frustrating that a coach hasn’t made proper adjustments to accommodate for the defense adjustments. That reminds people of moorheads stubbornness to not adapt. Then you go the malcontents stuff that apparently wasn’t a problem in game 1. So why is it problem after a few games? Makes no sense. Players are frustrated with the offense obviously. Leach thinks it’s lack of execution and not the scheme. I think players and fans think it’s a bit of both. I think if it works in one game it’s not the players. It’s lack of scheme to account for the change in the defense. And it’s frustrating to watch someone do the exact thing over and over with embarrassing results. Just like Moorhead passing in the rain against an elite pass rusher all game with no help blocking. Seeing leach continue to throw 80 passes with 6 Picks same qb trotted out each time for four games now. Who wouldn’t question what the hell is he doing? Very few first year programs struggle this bad on offense year one of a coach. People act like we have no talent snd players didn’t want to play. If that was the case we wouldn’t have beat LSU. The offense will work in certain scenarios with our players but the scenario has been changed. The blue print has been shown and the sec has the athletes to shut it down in that blue print. Moorhead didn’t understand the speed and athleticism on defense in this conference and neither did leach. The alarming part is leach believed is purely timing and execution and until he sees that’s is both that and defensive scheme we will continue to see issues.

 

[horshack.sixpack]

go find a good post by DAWG61 to highlight as an example and I might listen***

 

[horshack.sixpack]

Anything that falls short of a meeting at South Farm under a blue tent is not gonna cut it.

 

[mstateglfr]

Care to be challenged to a poll, Mr. Downvote? I don't want you to commit suicide if you lose, though, I know how much image means to you. But I guess it would hurt the Riden for Biden vote in Iowa.

What do you say?

- No I dont want to be challenged to a poll because I couldnt care less.
- Image means a lot to me here? 17ing really?!? Thats about the most goat comment ive seen in a long time.
- What does 'Riden for Biden' mean? And how would my image on here hurt the 'Riden for Biden' vote in Iowa? I seriously dont follow any of your last sentence.


You never cease to suck.

 

[maroonmadman]

The real problem is folks who think they know enough about a subject to offer actual constructive advice. This is not true. Most of you m-f'ers don't know ****. You just think you do.

 

[Maroon Eagle]

 

[Crazy Cotton]

That game almost cost me my graduate degree.

 

[DAWG61]

Easy there bible thumper. Don't you have a life full of hypocrisy to get back to. (There that should count as one)

 

[Russ Wheeler]

Then you go the malcontents stuff that apparently wasn’t a problem in game 1.

Hmmph ^^^^

 

[horshack.sixpack]

The real problem is folks who think they know enough about a subject to offer actual constructive advice. This is not true. Most of you m-f'ers don't know ****. You just think you do.

View attachment 18614

 

[MeridianDog]

Loser must cut off their ear and winner gets to wear it on a string around their neck.

Proof they both are serious about the challenge.

 

[DesotoCountyDawg]

You’re doing exactly what you’re trying to get rid of in your post. You have a bias toward mstateglfr and now you’re talking **** to him.

 

[maroonmadman]

View attachment 18614

The GIF gets you a hall pass. Use it wisely.

 

[horshack.sixpack]

Care to be challenged to a poll, Mr. Downvote? I don't want you to commit suicide if you lose, though, I know how much image means to you. But I guess it would hurt the Riden for Biden vote in Iowa.

What do you say?

Can one latch onto an "image" associated with an anonymous message board username? I'm not sure I understand how that is possible, but I may be reconsidering my choice in usernames...

 

[horshack.sixpack]

Wait! I just realized that the next season of Survivor is completely up in the air. This could be a substitute.***

 

[olblue.sixpack]

Well at least we would know for sure. It would be by a vote of the whole board, rather than a single moderator or two.

I think you are over estimating the give a flip factor of the “whole board”