In 2006, Bama fired Mike Shula and ran a search that at one point was a similar train wreck as the one we are seemingly on now. Much more of one, actually. They went after some guy named Saban multiple times, who laughed in their face and told them he wasn’t interested. After the multiple rejections, they found themselves finally with a suitor in RichRod who accepted their terms before backing out at the 11th hour. This all happened almost 2 weeks after they fired Shula. Then some other folks turned them down too. So, they went back at Saban yet again, with way more money, resources, and other incentives, finally getting him to agree to terms in early January (over a month after Shula was fired).
There are some parallels to Napier here. Obviously he’s not Saban, but he’s more than reasonable for us to go after as a solid hire. He’s our original #1, he rejects us perhaps a few times. We regroup and go after Plan B in Judge, which then falls apart on us at the 11th hour. The opportunity is still there for Plan A. Get the money right, get the staff commitment right, get the plan right, and just go get him. Do what it takes. Ball is in Cohen’s court.
There are some parallels to Napier here. Obviously he’s not Saban, but he’s more than reasonable for us to go after as a solid hire. He’s our original #1, he rejects us perhaps a few times. We regroup and go after Plan B in Judge, which then falls apart on us at the 11th hour. The opportunity is still there for Plan A. Get the money right, get the staff commitment right, get the plan right, and just go get him. Do what it takes. Ball is in Cohen’s court.