The argument is that they are a, "sleeping giant' that has continued to recruit well (recruits itself)...has a ton of revenue, an easier path to a division title, and an easier path to the CFP.
Not saying I agree, though with the right coach, they could continue to recruit well and could get things rolling again. But they HAVE to recruit nationally, and the average distance they get recruits from is much higher than ours, not to mention they have to recruit against other programs that recruit nationally as well. There is just not nearly as much in-state talent within a 180 mile radius or in-state to take advantage of, "staying home" recruits. Most of that talent is in Memphis, which is closer to several other SEC programs than it is UT.
Dan is a better fit at Miss State in part because he is good at finding local talent that he can develop with time. He does not appear to be an HC that is particularly interested in recruiting nationally, kissing 5-star ***, and being subject to expectations that go along with signing Top 5 classes.
I think UT fans who crave Dan aren't getting that he can be a very good coach, yet still not be a fit at UT. They do not have the patience to allow for an HC to take years to develop a program...much less have more than two 9-win-or-less seasons in a row.