Lindsey Miller responds...

[Faustdog]

Miller responds to Rebel Rags and The Great Charlie Merkel, and basically laughs at them. How dare he.

For example, Rebel Rags should have internet posts, or phone records, or emails, or text messages, or photographs of Mr. Miller and the John Doe defendants entering the same steakhouse minutes apart, or recordings provided by participants who were wearing a wire during their meetings, or videotaped statements from persons hiding behind screens with their voices altered, etc., etc. Put simply, if Rebel Rags knew of a mafia-like conspiracy involving "mafiosos" like Mr. Miller and "dons" like the John Doe defendants, then on the day it filed the Complaint, Rebel Rags should have had a modicum of evidence to support such a wild conspiracy theory.

http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2017/07/lindsey-miller-fires-back-at-rebel-rags.html

 

[RightOfCenter]

I laughed.

 

[Faustdog]

I'm not even a caveman lawyer, but you'd think there would have to be some evidence of communication to prove a conspiracy.

 

[bulldognation]

 

[amcdan2000]

Now I know where TSUN is getting their joy in thinking DM is now a named defendant in RR suit.

 

[tatedog]

Frivolous complaints get frivolous answers.

 

[KeyserSoze1999]

Cue the Chewbacca Defense.

View attachment 7270

 

[AssEndDawg]

So as I read this...

http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2017/07/lindsey-miller-fires-back-at-rebel-rags.html

Legal guys correct me if I am wrong. They are throwing out three things: defamation, commercial disparagement, and civil conspiracy. Sounds to me like the commercial disparagement is going to be easily tossed since that isn't even a tort in Mississippi. The Civil Conspiracy seems like a long shot because one of the only three people named has never met or talked to the other two. But as I read it, it seems that he needs the conspiracy in there in order to have grounds to keep the case in Lafayette County. Without lumping Lindsey Miller into this thing there is no way to fight the change of venue. This tells me that he isn't trying to win this case just as we expected, he is just wanting to ask a bunch of questions under oath in some misguided attempt to help Ole Miss.

The defamation can only be won if the people involved are stupid. Even if they are lying, as long as they stick to their story it's a he said, she said situation and Rebel Rags can not PROVE that they didn't give away free merch. I don't think our guys are lying, so the simple thing here is to just continue to tell the truth and have the defense council jump hard and fast on ANYTHING even slightly outside the lines of the free **** from Rebel Rags narrative. Of course that depends on getting the conspiracy tossed, because with that they can "explore" more ground.

I still think conspiracy will be tossed. It will be hard for a judge to put together two different NCAA interviews done at two different times by people that don't know each other, never talked to each other, and have no people in common. Their entire case depends on the NCAA pulling the string of the conspiracy and I think that's going to be a high bar to get over.

 

[13thEagle]

This would be the perfect response