Who really thinks.......?

Shep2win

Redshirt
Jan 18, 2024
33
36
0
Who really thinks Cal will change his starting lineup? He hasn't changed it since Bradshaw became available and has 2 potential first round picks coming off of the bench. I figure Z will join the Shep and Dilly rotation. If Adou were healthy I could see a platoon system coming back. Hope I am wrong! My opinion, not worth much!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

UKortho

All-American
Oct 13, 2015
5,041
9,680
77
Who really thinks Cal will change his starting lineup? He hasn't changed it since Bradshaw became available and has 2 potential first round picks coming off of the bench. I figure Z will join the Shep and Dilly rotation. If Adou were healthy I could see a platoon system coming back. Hope I am wrong! My opinion, not worth much!
Don’t see Edwards or Bradshaw not starting. Cal knows his recruiting one and dones would take a hit. It will cost us in the tournament when we get behind and Cal puckers like he always does. He gets nervous before big NCAA games and it rubs off
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
I've never seen another coach more stubborn and rigid about sticking to his original lineup plan. It's very clear that Cal already had Wagner/Reeves/Edwards/Mitchell/Bradshaw penciled in as his starting lineup before practice even began. And, by God, he's still sticking by it despite months of overwhelming evidence that he needs to make a change.

That said, the past shows he will make the change if his hand gets forced far enough. For example, the 2020 season began with Khalil Whitney penciled in as our starting three. But after it became painfully apparent that Whitney couldn't even dribble ...and Quickley was playing like a superstud ...he finally made the switch.

With Whitney, the difference was so dramatic ...as he was simply unplayable ...that Cal realized he had no choice. I'm not sure if we've reached that point with Edwards yet ...but we are getting close.
 
Last edited:

CincyUKFan

All-American
Dec 1, 2009
4,582
7,576
0
Who really thinks Cal will change his starting lineup? He hasn't changed it since Bradshaw became available and has 2 potential first round picks coming off of the bench. I figure Z will join the Shep and Dilly rotation. If Adou were healthy I could see a platoon system coming back. Hope I am wrong! My opinion, not worth much!
I don’t think he’ll change anything.

And at this point I have no idea what he should do (outside of benching Edwards).

Game in and game out he’s probably just going to have to ride the guys who are performing best.

If Wagner is launching threes and missing layups, pull him and see what Dilly or Reed bring. Same for Bradshaw. Not rebounding? Getting dominated down low? Bring in Big Z. Edwards struggling mightily? Bring in Adou.

I don’t know if that’s the best thing to do, but I imagine this is how Cal will do things.
 

CincyUKFan

All-American
Dec 1, 2009
4,582
7,576
0
Potentially four out of five of our bench players are better than the starters in front of them. I can’t decide if that’s insanely great news or just regular old insane.
Updated mock drafts will:

1. Again have Dilly and Reed in or near lottery and have DJ late-first or early second round.
2. Have Big Z in or near the lottery
3. Again have Bradshaw in the second round
4. Again have Reeves in the second round
5. Again have Edwards in the second round

And I firmly believe that if Thiero were healthy and got more PT, he’d be a late-first round consideration this year.

So we are without a doubt playing three in the starting lineup who will be drafted behind three guys who come off the bench.
 

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,749
19,973
103
Don't know why he'd change it now. Having a great rotation off the bench is as important as who starts the game. Besides, it's who finishes the game, not who starts it. I wouldn't disrupt it.
So you think a guaranteed 6-8 minutes of game time is fine with a bad lineup on the floor? And this doesn’t account for other parts of the game like twice at least last night cal had a stupidly bad lineup on the floor in the middle part of the half.
 
Nov 7, 2008
13,888
12,962
0
There was a thread about how cal would never play him before the game. Then that’s proven wrong. Now this.

You Moe’s would have dillingham fouled out in the first half if it were up to yall. Starting lineup was fine going into tonight.

People are miserable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf

TFCat11

Heisman
Mar 25, 2019
5,976
10,764
108
Don’t see Edwards or Bradshaw not starting. Cal knows his recruiting one and dones would take a hit. It will cost us in the tournament when we get behind and Cal puckers like he always does. He gets nervous before big NCAA games and it rubs off
So Cal’s recruiting will take a hit for starting players who don’t deserve it, but won’t take a hit for having deserving players come off the bench?
 

Big BlueBeard

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2018
2,484
4,264
98
So you think a guaranteed 6-8 minutes of game time is fine with a bad lineup on the floor? And this doesn’t account for other parts of the game like twice at least last night cal had a stupidly bad lineup on the floor in the middle part of the half.
I'm saying I wouldn't mess with it. It's becoming obvious Edwards' intended minutes are dwindling. Reed and Dilly get starters mins. You're likely gonna have a stretch or 2 anyway in every game where things aren't clicking. So yea, I'm not oevrerly concerned about 6 minutes. And "bad lineup" isn't what I'd call it. We've had worse. Much worse.
 

mcnicKY91

All-Conference
Aug 6, 2021
2,106
3,027
0
Don’t see Edwards or Bradshaw not starting. Cal knows his recruiting one and dones would take a hit. It will cost us in the tournament when we get behind and Cal puckers like he always does. He gets nervous before big NCAA games and it rubs off
That logic makes no sense...as the one and dones (Edwards and Bradshaw) you say to be benched (not starting) would then be replaced by other one and dones.

Yep...that will really cost Cal in recruiting...sigh.
 

sa_hunt

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2009
3,042
2,822
0
It is pretty crazy that Cal doesn’t start at least 2 kids who should start, maybe three now, and all in all likely hood his three highest draft picks, which NEVER happens!
No it’s not crazy at all. This is how we’re rolling now.
 

sa_hunt

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2009
3,042
2,822
0
It’s working good the way it is so far. The 3 losses all went down to the final plays and I know the UNCW game should have been a blowout win for us but hiccups do happen. We are scoring insane amounts of points. Defense is the one thing that needs work, not the starting lineup IMO.
Exactly, Yes 100 times.
 

NociHTTP

Heisman
Mar 8, 2023
12,403
19,384
113
I don’t think he’ll change anything.

And at this point I have no idea what he should do (outside of benching Edwards).

Game in and game out he’s probably just going to have to ride the guys who are performing best.

If Wagner is launching threes and missing layups, pull him and see what Dilly or Reed bring. Same for Bradshaw. Not rebounding? Getting dominated down low? Bring in Big Z. Edwards struggling mightily? Bring in Adou.

I don’t know if that’s the best thing to do, but I imagine this is how Cal will do things.
It's holding guys accountable, you're spot on. But Cal lets guys hold the team's success hostage even though he states he was never going to allow that again.
 

sa_hunt

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2009
3,042
2,822
0
So you think a guaranteed 6-8 minutes of game time is fine with a bad lineup on the floor? And this doesn’t account for other parts of the game like twice at least last night cal had a stupidly bad lineup on the floor in the middle part of the half.
He’s right and you’re wrong, that is all.
 

sa_hunt

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2009
3,042
2,822
0
It's holding guys accountable, you're spot on. But Cal lets guys hold the team's success hostage even though he states he was never going to allow that again.
Not a single player is “holding the teams success hostage “. Cal is doing a wonderful job with the rotation.
 

Cbbcrazy2

All-Conference
Feb 18, 2007
19,368
2,645
113
We have had numerous players that are great players in practice. For one or more reasons they can't bring it to the live game. I think Edwards is one of these players or Cal has made another promise to a 5 star recruit. We are 17 games in, what we do now through the SEC tourney directly controls the seed we get in March. Its time to hurt some feelings and finish the deal.
 

sa_hunt

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2009
3,042
2,822
0
Z will be 10 times the player Bradshaw is. To be honest, its such a glaring difference i can believe that cow wouldn't totally embarrassed if he doesn't add Z to the starting lineup and be called out by every single commentator of CBB.
Cal is doing what needs to be done. Cal doesn’t care about every commentator or you. I agree that Z appears to be better, however, so. They get their minutes either way. Also it’s spelled, Cal. Your attempt at belittling the coach seems sad and petty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Graham51

KentuckyFlyer

All-Conference
Jan 25, 2007
3,615
1,496
113
I don’t think he’ll change anything.

And at this point I have no idea what he should do (outside of benching Edwards).

Game in and game out he’s probably just going to have to ride the guys who are performing best.

If Wagner is launching threes and missing layups, pull him and see what Dilly or Reed bring. Same for Bradshaw. Not rebounding? Getting dominated down low? Bring in Big Z. Edwards struggling mightily? Bring in Adou.

I don’t know if that’s the best thing to do, but I imagine this is how Cal will do things.
That is the best thing to do, but has cow ever done that? how many times had he played a guy that wont defend or couldnt hit the ocean from a boat and let them stay in the game until we lost?
 

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,515
26,578
113
People always complain saying Cal favors the one and done higher draft picks but are now saying he is keeping the higher one and done types on the bench. Crazy.

It is based on their recruiting rankings not draft projections. It’s obvious that it happens and may be a necessary evil but wanted to clear that point up for you since you misstated the premise of one of the main criticisms of Cal.
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,893
17,800
93
It is based on their recruiting rankings not draft projections. It’s obvious that it happens and may be a necessary evil but wanted to clear that point up for you since you misstated the premise of one of the main criticisms of Cal.
Except:

He gave Derrick Willis more minutes than Gabriel and SKJ.
He gave Quade's starting spot to SGA.
He benched Khalil Whitney so hard the kid up and left the program.

Cal gives them a lot of leash. But he does adjust. The only kid that shouldn't be starting right now is Edwards. But he's cut Edwards minutes a great deal. He only played 12 minutes vs. UGA.
 

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,515
26,578
113
Except:

He gave Derrick Willis more minutes than Gabriel and SKJ.
He gave Quade's starting spot to SGA.
He benched Khalil Whitney so hard the kid up and left the program.

Cal gives them a lot of leash. But he does adjust. The only kid that shouldn't be starting right now is Edwards. But he's cut Edwards minutes a great deal. He only played 12 minutes vs. UGA.

The goal posts keep moving here. It’s starting spots not most minutes that’s been the source of people’s ire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

UKortho

All-American
Oct 13, 2015
5,041
9,680
77
That logic makes no sense...as the one and dones (Edwards and Bradshaw) you say to be benched (not starting) would then be replaced by other one and dones.

Yep...that will really cost Cal in recruiting...sigh.
Ugonna a one and done? What about Thiero? Maybe an argument can be made about Shep- but I don’t think he is a one and goner.
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,893
17,800
93
The goal posts keep moving here. It’s starting spots not most minutes that’s been the source of people’s ire.
Let me make sure I got this correct here:

If Edwards played 35 minutes, but came off the bench--you'd be fine with that? This is a ridiculous argument. You can't believe that.

Minutes played matter way more than who starts. I'd be losing my damn mind right now if Edwards were still getting 25-30 minutes a game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKortho

UKortho

All-American
Oct 13, 2015
5,041
9,680
77
So Cal’s recruiting will take a hit for starting players who don’t deserve it, but won’t take a hit for having deserving players come off the bench?
You don’t think benching Edwards and Bradshaw will hurt his recruiting. Maybe you are right. Don’t see any reason that Edwards starts.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
80,904
124,135
93
 

UKortho

All-American
Oct 13, 2015
5,041
9,680
77
Except:

He gave Derrick Willis more minutes than Gabriel and SKJ.
He gave Quade's starting spot to SGA.
He benched Khalil Whitney so hard the kid up and left the program.

Cal gives them a lot of leash. But he does adjust. The only kid that shouldn't be starting right now is Edwards. But he's cut Edwards minutes a great deal. He only played 12 minutes vs. UGA.
I am hanging onto this hope. You aren’t wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats192

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,749
19,973
103
That logic makes no sense...as the one and dones (Edwards and Bradshaw) you say to be benched (not starting) would then be replaced by other one and dones.

Yep...that will really cost Cal in recruiting...sigh.
the rub is the others were not supposed to be one and dones, only Bradshaw, DJ, and Edwards were and they are the three that cal promised would get their roles. DJ has earned his, Bradshaw is a bench player and should be playing a backup role and Edwards, while I really like the kid and have been pulling for him, doesn’t bring anything to the table at this stage.