the allegation that Leo told a teammate/friend he was called into Mullen's office after the 2016 Spring game and was "coached" by Mullen as to what to say to the NCAA. Allegedly, Mullen wanted to make sure the source of Leo's payment was protected. These are allegations in the lawsuit, nothing more. If there is any provable truth to this, could be problematic.
First, this is from the guilty party laying blame elsewhere, so 'yeah, whatever'.
Second, "coached" is a relative term coming from the guilty. I wouldn't be surprised if Mullen asked Leo what was going on and they sat down and discussed it. That isn't improper. "Coaching", though? I doubt it.
Third, how could you possibly prove this unless you have confessions? Do they really think guys would confess? Burden of proof is on Rebel Rags.
Fifth, great, big, hypothetical IF Leo & Kobe were lying (they're not), what happens? Leo & Kobe get in trouble? Suspended? Ok, say they're declared ineligible (never happen). That'd be bad because they're great, but we'll be fine. They'd have to pay damages? Ok. Good luck collecting. MSU certainly wouldn't have to pay the damages just the legal fees. You think they're going to drag Mullen into a confession? Dream big.
Fifth, Leo still has the free gear that was given to him at Rebel Rags. They're telling the truth, so it's all moot anyway.
Rebel Rags is simply trying to save his reputation with his customers, and he's doing a fantastic job. His legal fees are the best marketing expenses he's ever had. Kudos to him.
