Rooker has fallen behind

[DudyDog]

Y'all be slacking....get on it.

http://web.usabaseball.com/goldenspikes/vote.jsp

 

[CochiseCowbell]

Bump.

 

[MSUDawg25]

I just realized it lets you vote as much as you want. Which is a terrible system, but whatever. I voted like 100 times, so Brent I'll be expecting a mention in your acceptance speech.

 

[QuaoarsKing]

I just realized it lets you vote as much as you want. Which is a terrible system, but whatever. I voted like 100 times, so Brent I'll be expecting a mention in your acceptance speech.

The fan vote winner gets 1 of the 200+ votes for the award. The only way the fan vote ever matters is if the media vote is tied or within 1.

Unfortunately McKay will get almost all of the media votes, so the 1 vote our fans manage for Rooker isn't going to mean much. Just bad luck -- his numbers would have probably gotten him the award most years, just not this year. Kinda like Dak in 2014.

 

[MSUDawg25]

Yeah, I know. But they still could've made it so you have to at least have to clear your cache before voting again. Imagine if it did come down to one vote and Rook lost because some little old lady in Louisville sat at her computer and voted 12,000 times.

 

[57stratdawg]

What's the breakdown of the final standings? Surely it's not 100% fan vote, right?

 

[QuaoarsKing]

What's the breakdown of the final standings? Surely it's not 100% fan vote, right?

The fan vote winner gets 1 of the 200+ votes for the award. The only way the fan vote ever matters is if the media vote is tied or within 1.

.

 

[MSUDawg25]

There's something fishy about this. Let's just say theoretically** someone set up a simple macro to vote for Rook every 4-5 seconds for over 24hrs. And he is still falling behind. If it only lets you vote once per IP, that's fine but it should just say that.