Word I heard last night...

[Xenomorph]

Supposedly a week ago the bears were expecting more level ones in the latest NOA. Like... 12 more. The thinking is the NCAA opted to only include the ones they corroborated from several different angles and were slam dunks.

If I just outed myself to somebody in Oxford.. sorry dude... but hell, you might not work there much longer anyway.

My thoughts: Once they had enough to double tap the program they didn't want to muddy the waters with anything that could be contested.

 

[MaroonNation]

Are you the dude locked in the basement yesterday of the IPF?

 

[Shmuley]

I'm wondering if the NCAA is baiting these MFers? Keep fighting them, shitheads.

 

[coach66]

Not to mention the amount of time it would take to fully prove all the

allegations, it probably became too much.

 

[turkish]

This has kinda been the idea I had in my head. People on our side have been screaming for months that the NCAA doesn't need proof. However, none of the most extravagant accusations we've talked about over the years were included in the NOAs. This implies, to me, that they, in fact, only listed the items for which they had proof, which is a little disappointing. Hopefully it means they will simply prosecute to the fullest extent on these items, knowing that there were so many other "maybes" that they didn't go for.

 

[57stratdawg]

Or maybe OM didn't release all of the allegations yesterday.

 

[turkish]

That is also a possibility.

 

[wtw2400]

Or maybe OM didn't release all of the allegations yesterday.

I think this is an angle not a lot of people are taking for whatever reason. Why in the world should we believe them now when the past year + they have lied to everyone? I wouldn't be surprised if they left out their own current players named in it on the violation that talks about paying a kid 15000. I mean there is more to a violation than just one instance. Did anyone skip over the fact that they LIED to the NCAA? Why wouldn't they LIE now?

 

[jb1020]

Ding Ding Ding

Why should anyone, at this point, think OM is telling the whole truth at this point.

 

[MaroonNation]

I think this is an angle not a lot of people are taking for whatever reason. Why in the world should we believe them now when the past year + they have lied to everyone? I wouldn't be surprised if they left out their own current players named in it on the violation that talks about paying a kid 15000. I mean there is more to a violation than just one instance. Did anyone skip over the fact that they LIED to the NCAA? Why wouldn't they LIE now?

As Wolken said in Bounds this morning. "Show me the NOA or shut the 17 up talking about how it isn't serious".

 

[DerHntr]

It's possible that the NCAA is only using things they can corroborate because of the amount of money involved in coaching now. Giving freeze a show cause is making him lose a $5 million a year job. It is much harder to give a show cause in that scenario.

 

[Digging dog]

They maybe holding Tunsil's draft night in their back pocket as a trump card. Found odd that it wasn't mentioned in 2nd. And everybody eluded to that being the reason the investigation continued.

 

[MaroonNation]

If they consider that that $5,000,000/yr is going towards the salary of a puppet who will let the boosters run amuck I bet they won't have an issue. As I stated yesterday. This isn't Freeze's first run-in with the NCAA. He was in trouble as Director of Crootin' under "O the Corch" at OM.

 

[coach66]

There are multiple infractions that can make up an allegation.

nm