You want the no name small schools college guards over proven bigs. You not learned anything from watching Mintz Grady CJ and Reeves. A player of the year Oscar and a Big 10 All American center if he came would slow down the offense. You want a guard shooting 1-6 and give up 15 points a game. But hold on that one shoot may be a 3.
You really are one of the worst posters on this board.
Grady was very good before he got plantar fasciatis, made 45% of his 3's (3.0/gm) the first 27 games of the season. He tried to play through the injury, and his attempts (couldn't move as quickly to get open) and his % both went down but still made 41.5% of his 3's.
Mintz was our best player, albeit on our worst team, and then the next year was a solid 6th man. He was not brought in to be a star or even starter, he was brought to be a complimentary piece of the bench.
Reeves (as I've proved many times the past 3 weeks with Stats) had a good season, 2nd in scoring, 1st in scoring/min. He made 39.8% of his 3's (2.4/gm). Yes he was streaky, and yes had his worst game vs KSU. But he was no more streaky than he was the prior year or than SEC-POY Miller (which I've proved). AND every team (except 2) ends the season with a loss, and in that final loss it's usually because the best players/shooters had a bad game (like Miller & Bama). What you hope doesn't happen is that 2-3 of your top 3-4 guys all have bad games the same night (like we did w/ Reeves & Toppin).
Fredrick, I'll give you, was a complete failure. But he was the one of these that was a proven shooter from a P5 school, which goes against your past narrative to avoid guys from no-name schools.