Postseason ban

[msubrave]

So the wbb self imposed a 1 year postseason ban for 6 level 1 violations. The football team admits to 8. How do they expect to avoid at least a 1 year bowl ban?

 

[121Josey]

So the wbb self imposed a 1 year postseason ban for 6 level 1 violations. The football team admits to 8. How do they expect to avoid at least a 1 year bowl ban?

They say that the players involved are long gone (or so they suggest). The WBB post-season ban was self-imposed 2012-2013, supposedly when the players were still playing. But TUNS FB didn't implement a post-season ban when it found out about the violations... but that would have been admitting guilt.

So, the NCAA will say, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander."

 

[DerHntr]

WBB was 6 violations with 5 players on the court at any time. That's 1.2 violations per player. Football was 8 violations with 11 players on the field at any time. That's 0.727 violations per player.**

 

[bulldognation]

They suck at WBB anyway. They wouldn't have had any post season to ban themselves from to begin with.

What a sacrifice they're willing to make.

Try again Rebs. I'm sure the NCAA can find something more meaningful to get through to you that your program is a paid-for disgrace. Offering up this blemished sacrificial lamb won't work while you've got your middle fingers in the air to everyone.

 

[thatsbaseball]

If they lose as many schollies per year as they should the ban will take care of itself

 

[patdog]

They probably realize not getting s bowl ban is a long shot. But you're definitely getting one if you self impose it.

 

[jb1020]

Not sure people realize how close we came to a bowl ban with the Redmond deal. Theirs is coming

 

[MarkDallas]

Are you punishing the players or the institution?

 

[KeyserSoze1999]

The clocks & pillows will be returned and Coach O will handle the players punishment...AFTER...THE...SEASON.**

 

[dawgoneyall]

Are you punishing the players or the institution?

Cheating schools have cheating players.