Given how lazy hugh whataburger/ dan pawling typically write, I figured we could give some historical perspective as to quality of beat writers between the 2 schools. The way I figure, is that the C'liar gives us the legit ones that give a !?(k about journalism, and they give the bears the ones that will be good pawns. I turn to the sage readers of the Pack to validate my theory based on the careers of former State and Miss writer.....