That indisputable evidence saying is 17.
benatmsu Junior May 28, 2007 2,403 231 63 Sep 26, 2015 #2 Yeah, TV kept focusing on his left leg... ...but I couldn't tell if his right foot was down or not. I think it was OOB, but you couldn't tell for sure.
Yeah, TV kept focusing on his left leg... ...but I couldn't tell if his right foot was down or not. I think it was OOB, but you couldn't tell for sure.
R RocketDawg All-Conference Oct 21, 2011 19,036 2,104 113 Sep 26, 2015 #3 It was the right call. Left hand was out.
B BigMotherTucker Sophomore Aug 20, 2006 6,779 155 63 Sep 26, 2015 #4 17 his hand... His toe was down.
1 121Josey Redshirt Oct 30, 2012 7,503 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #5 Nobody doubts that. The question is when it was out.
D dogfan96 Redshirt Jun 3, 2007 2,188 12 66 Sep 26, 2015 #7 Right foot got down first. You can see it bounce off the grass
D drt7891 Redshirt Dec 6, 2010 6,727 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #8 It was out when his arm hit the white first. It was clearly the right call.
1 121Josey Redshirt Oct 30, 2012 7,503 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #9 drt7891 said: It was out when his arm hit the white first. It was clearly the right call. Click to expand... BS
drt7891 said: It was out when his arm hit the white first. It was clearly the right call. Click to expand... BS
U UpTheMiddlex3Punt All-Conference May 28, 2007 17,963 3,966 113 Sep 26, 2015 #11 Worst part is they blew a play dead where we were well on our way to a first down.
T tatedog Redshirt Mar 28, 2015 8,739 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #13 Yep thats what I was referring to... total ********, at least they got their original 17 up right.
T tatedog Redshirt Mar 28, 2015 8,739 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #14 We are getting the Bama treatment by the refs compared to the job they are putting on Vandy in Oxford.
We are getting the Bama treatment by the refs compared to the job they are putting on Vandy in Oxford.
A ALdawg.sixpack Redshirt Mar 28, 2010 443 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #15 you telling me you're 100% certain the sole of his right foot didn't hit the ground....this happened way before his arm hit btw
you telling me you're 100% certain the sole of his right foot didn't hit the ground....this happened way before his arm hit btw
1msucub Senior Oct 3, 2004 2,129 663 113 Sep 26, 2015 #16 No kidding.... You see that catch interference garbage? Awful.
D DanglyGiant Redshirt Aug 22, 2012 6 0 1 Sep 26, 2015 #17 ALdawg said: you telling me you're 100% certain the sole of his right foot didn't hit the ground....this happened way before his arm hit btw Click to expand... It was before he even started reaching to break his fall.
ALdawg said: you telling me you're 100% certain the sole of his right foot didn't hit the ground....this happened way before his arm hit btw Click to expand... It was before he even started reaching to break his fall.
T tatedog Redshirt Mar 28, 2015 8,739 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #18 I don't think that was a violation even under the old halo rule.
S Shamoan Redshirt Jun 27, 2013 12,466 0 0 Sep 26, 2015 #19 my brand new 55 inch high def tv says his toe tried to tap, but whiffed. great snag by bear, but his toe never hit before his arm went oob.
my brand new 55 inch high def tv says his toe tried to tap, but whiffed. great snag by bear, but his toe never hit before his arm went oob.
