MORE players does not mean BETTER players. Your comparison isn't even a fair one. What would be a 'fair' comparison would be to take the 2012 roster plus projected signees when Stansbury was fired and compare that to the current roster with projected signees when Ray was fired. I do not even need to post the contents of that comparison to know the difference is night and day.
It's not that we have more players, it's that Senior Ware, Thomas, and Sword are better than freshman Ware, Thomas, and Sword and while Steele and Lewis would have been good pieces to add to this team, but Steele is not some huge improvement over IJ Ready and Lewis would have been valuable mainly as just another big man. Neither were big time talents that make the talent when ray got here much better than when he left.
And if you take projected signees, we have the guy at LSU (josh gray?) and that was pretty much all we lost that I remember. Now we have Tookie. That seems pretty comparable.
You said we are in a much worse position talent wise and that's just wrong. That's not some huge credit to Ray because the core of our team is made of players that were here when Ray got here; he basically walked into a team short on talent that was young, and left with a team that was short on talent but was older and at least was a full team. But to say he left us in a worse position talent wise is just incorrect. There's no way to spin that statement. You can say we would be in a better position talent wise if we had hired another coach (plausible but speculation) or kept stansbury (most likely true), but he didn't leave us worse than when he found us.