Toggle sidebar

Texas Going After Calipari?

P

Panthur

Heisman
Aug 5, 2008
9,225
12,782
0
RunninRichie said:
you mean this poll? Cal lost 193-73.

Click to expand...
Yes.

And it’s worth noting that I and probably a whole hell of a lot of other people abstained from voting in that poll because:

—We’re not ready to say carte blanc we’re already completely done with Cal
—We think he deserves one more season to turn things around or at least make some serious progress towards turning things around (real progress, not another Elite Eight team that bolts and leaves the stable empty)
—Believes he deserves that chance but don’t really see much of any way he actually pulls it off.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie
TortElvisII

TortElvisII

Heisman
May 7, 2010
51,700
96,942
66
kb22stang said:
Here's the thing, rational people don't limit their assessment to most recent few years. The guy can flat out coach even if the hilljacks don't want to acknowledge it because he doesn't pander to you and make you feel like your opinion matters.
Click to expand...
Anyone that disagrees with you gets labeled with a derogatory name. You need to get some books on manners or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukgrad83, wildcatwelder_rivals, ShadowFromHomewardBound and 11 others
B

Blueworld_3.0

Heisman
Sep 23, 2008
14,125
11,254
113
weatherbird said:
While nobody owes UK anything if Cal leaves, the buyout itself makes it less likely that Cal leaves. Most think this was a terrible contract, and maybe it was, but if the rumor of UCLA offerring Cal 10 mil/yr is true, then we kept him for a lot less. Cal got 8 mil this year (obviously overpaid this year), and is scheduled to get a total of 8.5 mil the next 4 years, then 9 mil for the 4 years after that if he keeps coaching. The buyout the university must pay to fire him is 75% of the remaining money on the contract if he remains the coach. If he elects to step down from coaching after 2024, then he came remain with the university as a special assistant, which would decrease his salary to 1 mil/yr. However, if he steps down to that position, then the buyout moves to 100%, or 1 mil/yr until 2029. Contrary to what I have heard, I can find no where in the contract where Cal would receive anything past 2029, ie 1 mil/yr for life. The contract states that the terms, without being extended end in 2029, regardless of what position he is in.

Now for why the buyout helps UK to retain him. Another school could come after Cal, and offer him big money, but are unlikely to offer that kind of buyout, or guaranteed money. Even a school offering Cal 10 mil/yr, but little buyout is probably not going to lure him away, because if he is fired, he won't get as much money. If the UCLA rumors are true, then the buyout is what was needed to retain Cal without matching the 10 mil/yr. In fact, unless the contract is amended, Cal will never earn 10 mil/yr at UK.
Click to expand...
Looking back now, it appears the real winners were UCLA and John Calipari. Of course, he stood to win big either way. But, I seriously doubt UCLA would have come knocking with the supposed $10 million per year offer following a season like UK just went through. And I doubt UK would have offered the "lifetime contract" after this season either.
UCLA ended up with Cronin for much less than they'd been willing to pay Calipari and even though their regular season was pretty average, here they are in the Sweet 16.
Meanwhile, Calipari wins the lottery with a huge pile of money and ironclad deal designed solely to give him a secure future. All while his latest team with a #1 recruiting class, goes 9-16.
The old saying "timing is everything" couldn't be more applicable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigRedMachineBigBlueNation
M

MakinMusic_rivals

All-Conference
Mar 21, 2006
10,716
3,598
66
SmedMoley said:
But as we have learned he won't play the in state talent. Something about taking hearts and so forth.
Click to expand...

I think there might be a significant disparity (generally) in Texas talent versus Kentucky. Lots of high level hoops players come from Texas. Kentucky not so much. Of course, a big piece of that is population difference but the difference exists nonetheless.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1629204751
G

gracetoyou

Heisman
Apr 19, 2009
19,787
28,604
113
bookerfan66 said:
Why?Is he not getting paid enough?
Click to expand...

You could not pay me enough money to put up with this unrealistic, narrcistic fanbase. In fact if I were him, I'd go ahead & have as bad a season as possible next year & commit some violations while I was at it. Then retire & laugh.
#ijoke
 
T

TNCatfanforever

Heisman
Apr 3, 2003
22,050
13,893
62
deplion said:
Pretty close to where I am too.

I'm not at all confident he is willing / able to change and adapt to today's game, but he has long been an innovator (for better or worse) and deserves every chance to do so.

At the same time, if Texas comes along and plucks him away tomorrow, so be it.

As a long time huge Cal fan, I can't believe I just said that, but here we are.
Click to expand...
I suppose I agree. Dep what would you call a successful season for Cal to stay? I say 25-30 wins and no less than elite 8.
 
B

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
weatherbird said:
While nobody owes UK anything if Cal leaves, the buyout itself makes it less likely that Cal leaves. Most think this was a terrible contract, and maybe it was, but if the rumor of UCLA offerring Cal 10 mil/yr is true, then we kept him for a lot less. Cal got 8 mil this year (obviously overpaid this year), and is scheduled to get a total of 8.5 mil the next 4 years, then 9 mil for the 4 years after that if he keeps coaching. The buyout the university must pay to fire him is 75% of the remaining money on the contract if he remains the coach. If he elects to step down from coaching after 2024, then he came remain with the university as a special assistant, which would decrease his salary to 1 mil/yr. However, if he steps down to that position, then the buyout moves to 100%, or 1 mil/yr until 2029. Contrary to what I have heard, I can find no where in the contract where Cal would receive anything past 2029, ie 1 mil/yr for life. The contract states that the terms, without being extended end in 2029, regardless of what position he is in.

Now for why the buyout helps UK to retain him. Another school could come after Cal, and offer him big money, but are unlikely to offer that kind of buyout, or guaranteed money. Even a school offering Cal 10 mil/yr, but little buyout is probably not going to lure him away, because if he is fired, he won't get as much money. If the UCLA rumors are true, then the buyout is what was needed to retain Cal without matching the 10 mil/yr. In fact, unless the contract is amended, Cal will never earn 10 mil/yr at UK.
Click to expand...
You are correct in your contract info. He does not get $1 million every year for life like many on here post. It’s a 10 year contract that expires in 2029 whether he is still coaching or has moved into the administrative role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*
D

deplion_rivals116063

All-American
May 21, 2002
26,689
8,595
0
TNCatfanforever said:
I suppose I agree. Dep what would you call a successful season for Cal to stay? I say 25-30 wins and no less than elite 8.
Click to expand...
I'm looking at the overall picture more than just the W/L record next year.

I want to see if he does adjust his style of play and recruiting philosophy like he said he would.

I have my doubts, but if he does, there is no reason he can't have us back contending for titles again in the very near future.

If it is the same uninspired dribble drive offense that doesn't emphasize threes and is coupled with kids who have no business leaving going pro again, well . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boozer93, RunninRichie, nickhorvathsuxazz and 4 others
L

LmdCat

Heisman
Jan 8, 2006
23,627
18,894
0
jace2012 said:
You couldn’t pay me enough to deal with some of the fans even though the great fans outnumber the loud, obnoxious and entitled, it still would be to much to take on thinking you have to keep people happy instead of doing what you envision and managing your team.
Click to expand...
While you are dissing the fans, you won't ever have to worry about someone trying to pay you enough. So if that is your only worry, you really don't have any worries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cawood86_rivals and Anon1679859502
C

cathouse_rivals216755

Heisman
Dec 30, 2002
10,641
20,618
0
rick64 said:
Less pressure at Texas that's for sure. Football is king, basketball just takes up the space on the sports section until spring football.
Click to expand...
The bigger question is would Cal's big ego allow him to play second fiddle to football?

I can't see Cal taking a back seat to anyone when there is a microphone involved.

Money is no object with Cal so why do you think he stays at UK.

They don't call him King Cal for no reason.

He would just be little ole Cal at Texas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom