Nick Declares And Staying In Draft

Shaudylo

Heisman
Apr 2, 2011
11,513
25,901
112
It’s just amazing losing 3 possibly 4 guys who stock is in the 50s or undrafted . That’s unbelievable . At first I didn’t think this Covid **** really factored into it but I wonder if the uncertainty played a decision with IQ or Nick . I believe Hagans was leaving regardless .
 

RoyKent

Heisman
Feb 3, 2015
23,016
33,287
66
It’s just amazing losing 3 possibly 4 guys who stock is in the 50s or undrafted . That’s unbelievable . At first I didn’t think this Covid **** really factored into it but I wonder if the uncertainty played a decision with IQ or Nick . I believe Hagans was leaving regardless .

6 guys will be leaving early and only 1 is likely to be a 1st round pick. Very frustrating.
 

dckala2_rivals16641

All-Conference
Aug 3, 2006
18,541
4,026
0
I don’t get it with these fringe players this year.

This nba season could extend to The fall. no summer league, no combines, no normal draft process. Stay at your school and let this **** work out over the next year.

Can’t have Clarke and Boston fall into the skal type or its nit bound.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,816
0
Don’t most teams have two centers and two power forwards? Haarms and Richards as the 5’s, Ware and Jackson as the 4’s

You're dreaming. Haarms is not gonna expend his final year of eligibility at a place where he'll be a backup.

Our center position next year will Nick or Haarms or neither. But there's no way we'll have both.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,660
100,792
113
It’s just amazing losing 3 possibly 4 guys who stock is in the 50s or undrafted . That’s unbelievable . At first I didn’t think this Covid **** really factored into it but I wonder if the uncertainty played a decision with IQ or Nick . I believe Hagans was leaving regardless .

I think these guys were going to leave regardless.

It just goes to show that we need either an abundance of returners, or an elite class of freshmen (or a mixture of the two, obviously). We're probably one stud away from serious title contention right now for next season. Getting someone like Kuminga would change that obviously, as leaning too much on two stud freshmen and a bunch of second tier newcomers is not a recipe for a title team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaudylo

Shaudylo

Heisman
Apr 2, 2011
11,513
25,901
112
I think these guys were going to leave regardless.

It just goes to show that we need either an abundance of returners, or an elite class of freshmen (or a mixture of the two, obviously). We're probably one stud away from serious title contention right now for next season. Getting someone like Kuminga would change that obviously, as leaning too much on two stud freshmen and a bunch of second tier newcomers is not a recipe for a title team.
Even if we got Kuminga or Brown it’s still frustrating not returning any vets . If EJ returns which is funny that we are asking at this point I hope he makes a big jump like we seen with Nick and PJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son_Of_Saul

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,816
0
It’s one thing to lose a bunch of 1st rounders every year. It’s always a bit of a guy punch but understandable. Losing a group of underclassmen projected as 2nd round picks is hard to swallow.

Yep, this is what has really changed. This system made a lot more sense in Cal's early years back when the guys leaving were all first rounders.

But now it seems that a mere second round projection is all it takes. Hell, we've even got guys jumping who know they won't be drafted at all (see Briscoe, Gabriel, Humphries, probably EJ this year, etc.). That is the troubling new development.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,660
100,792
113
Even if we got Kuminga or Brown it’s still frustrating not returning any vets . If EJ returns which is funny that we are asking at this point I hope he makes a big jump like we seen with Nick and PJ.

Yes, and no team in history has won a title without significant contributions from multiple upperclassmen. Not the 2012 UK team. Not the 2015 Duke team.

Can it happen? I suppose. But, if we count on a bunch of second tier freshmen ( our class of newcomers outside of Boston and Clarke) to play to their ceilings or above those ceilings, we're going to be in for a rude awakening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaudylo

kl40504_rivals

Heisman
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
Yes, and no team in history has won a title without significant contributions from multiple upperclassmen. Not the 2012 UK team. Not the 2015 Duke team.

Can it happen? I suppose. But, if we count on a bunch of second tier freshmen ( our class of newcomers outside of Boston and Clarke) to play to their ceilings or above those ceilings, we're going to be in for a rude awakening.
Really
 

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,660
100,792
113
Point guard will be fine with Wentz and Askew.

Maybe. It could also be the equivalent of having similar to Julius Mays and Quade Green in the backcourt.

We've seen in the past that guys who have a bunch of question marks regarding their instant impact tend to live up to the reality of those question marks. The SGAs of the world who come from out of nowhere are pretty rare. It's more reasonable to expect something close to what we got from our point guard play in 2019 from Hagans/IQ - an up-and-down collective contribution that couldn't really be counted on consistently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL_Cat

Son_Of_Saul

Hall of Famer
Dec 7, 2007
45,660
100,792
113
If Boston and Clarke aren't everything (and then some) that people are expecting, next season could go south quickly.

And even if they are, you need more than two consistent legitimate players. We had two in 2018 with Knox and SGA and a supporting cast that I would rate as being better than next year (assuming our class is done if Haarms commits to UK). Those guys needed a third consistent option. We all hoped it would Diallo, but he fizzled out in the Sweet Sixteen.

We're going to need a third stud. People can inflate Brooks or Askew or Jackson or whoever, but we've seen this script before. The players who we expect to outperform realistic expectations rarely do so whereas the guys who we know will perform often do precisely that. Right now, we have two guys in the latter category.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,454
62,072
113
It’s just amazing losing 3 possibly 4 guys who stock is in the 50s or undrafted . That’s unbelievable . At first I didn’t think this Covid **** really factored into it but I wonder if the uncertainty played a decision with IQ or Nick . I believe Hagans was leaving regardless .

It seems to slide back further and further. At the beginning, we figured if a player wasn't in lottery, they were coming back. And then if it wasn't the 1st round. And then if it wasn't the top40 picks (as those first 10 often get contracts).. and now, it's if there's even a chance of getting drafted, you go.

And I still keep thinking "Is coming back to Kentucky for one year that unfathomable, that you'd roll the dice on even being able to PLAY professional ball?" Nick and IQ would for sure have draft positions, as both would be preseason POY candidates from the start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaudylo

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,454
62,072
113
And even if they are, you need more than two consistent legitimate players. We had two in 2018 with Knox and SGA and a supporting cast that I would rate as being better than next year (assuming our class is done if Haarms commits to UK). Those guys needed a third consistent option. We all hoped it would Diallo, but he fizzled out in the Sweet Sixteen.

We're going to need a third stud. People can inflate Brooks or Askew or Jackson or whoever, but we've seen this script before. The players who we expect to outperform realistic expectations rarely do so whereas the guys who we know will perform often do precisely that. Right now, we have two guys in the latter category.

I suspect SOMEONE will take that 3rd spot. We have so many option it's almost impossible that one of Askew, Mintz, Ware, Jackson, Fletcher, Brooks don't show out. Granted, we'd prefer it for a big to be the one to do so.. but the chances are likely that SOMEONE plays to their ranking or better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kl40504_rivals

kl40504_rivals

Heisman
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
It seems to slide back further and further. At the beginning, we figured if a player wasn't in lottery, they were coming back. And then if it wasn't the 1st round. And then if it wasn't the top40 picks (as those first 10 often get contracts).. and now, it's if there's even a chance of getting drafted, you go.

And I still keep thinking "Is coming back to Kentucky for one year that unfathomable, that you'd roll the dice on even being able to PLAY professional ball?" Nick and IQ would for sure have draft positions, as both would be preseason POY candidates from the start.
Not if they get serious injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

Yardeth

Heisman
Jan 2, 2007
13,504
17,786
67
Door slammed on Nick's career at UK. Good luck big guy and thanks for being a part of BBN.
 

Shaudylo

Heisman
Apr 2, 2011
11,513
25,901
112
Yes, and no team in history has won a title without significant contributions from multiple upperclassmen. Not the 2012 UK team. Not the 2015 Duke team.

Can it happen? I suppose. But, if we count on a bunch of second tier freshmen ( our class of newcomers outside of Boston and Clarke) to play to their ceilings or above those ceilings, we're going to be in for a rude awakening.
Yup and they have to reach their ceiling . I like what I have seen but I always temper my expectations for incoming freshman .
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,454
62,072
113
Not if they get serious injuries.

But what are the chances? We've heard this as a possibility, and there's always a chance. But it's so unlikely. What, maybe 8 or 10 power conference players have serious, season ending injuries, if that? No other athlete seems to run away from a potential injury like this. Which is why I'm not sure if it's even a factor.

Baseball players come back, with Tommy John surgery being more prevalent than a torn Achilles. Football players with head injuries and body punishment.
 

STL_Cat

Heisman
Dec 4, 2011
65,183
58,360
98
IQ had a great year and his draft potential is probably at it's highest. Not much reason for him to come back other than to play some point.

Maybe, maybe not. I’m not going crazy over him leaving but him coming back to potentially try to play his way into the 1st round certainly wouldn’t be a crazy thing to do.
 

dlh331

Heisman
Jan 4, 2003
28,693
22,568
113
Reminds me the the exodus that happened after that "meh" 2018 team got finished off by Kansas State. We lost SGA, Knox, Vanderbilt, Diallo, Gabriel, SKJ, Wynyard, and ultimately Green, who transferred the next winter.

And we were one of the 3 best teams in the nation in 2019
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlobUK

kl40504_rivals

Heisman
Oct 5, 2018
15,258
11,184
0
But what are the chances? We've heard this as a possibility, and there's always a chance. But it's so unlikely. What, maybe 8 or 10 power conference players have serious, season ending injuries, if that? No other athlete seems to run away from a potential injury like this. Which is why I'm not sure if it's even a factor.

Baseball players come back, with Tommy John surgery being more prevalent than a torn Achilles. Football players with head injuries and body punishment.
Baseball and football have no other choice but come back unless they are seniors. They are not eligible to go pro unless they have completed 3 years in college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

Shaudylo

Heisman
Apr 2, 2011
11,513
25,901
112
It seems to slide back further and further. At the beginning, we figured if a player wasn't in lottery, they were coming back. And then if it wasn't the 1st round. And then if it wasn't the top40 picks (as those first 10 often get contracts).. and now, it's if there's even a chance of getting drafted, you go.

And I still keep thinking "Is coming back to Kentucky for one year that unfathomable, that you'd roll the dice on even being able to PLAY professional ball?" Nick and IQ would for sure have draft positions, as both would be preseason POY candidates from the start.
Yup that’s exactly how it’s been . We are a long way from losing a lot from a ream because they were first round picks