Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Volatility_rivals135605" data-source="post: 131746303" data-attributes="member: 1476288">Ahh, if everything &quot;insiders&quot; ( ie writers), posted was true the world would be a strange place.&nbsp; They have biases &amp; agendas too, frankly from what he said in the article, not a single data point supports his opinion, esp those that are revenue/value based, not one.&nbsp; Which tells me its lazy boy writing, probably needed to submit 20 lines before Ytime. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />The one line I did agree with however, it doesnt make sense for the ACC to just add WVU.&nbsp; If they add WVU, they need to add at least 1 more team, whether its ND or someone else.&nbsp; Tho in reality, that would be reversed with ND being the priority.&nbsp; Thats why I believe things wont progress forward(publicly), until a few more triggers occur.&nbsp; Much will depend on ND, but maybe they are aggressive and expand to 16 or 20 no matter what ND does, who knows. We def both agree that is the best path for security, after-all we also both realize the benefits of diversification, and if WVU does join the ACC, we also both want it to be as strong &amp; secure as possible.&nbsp; This will go on for longer then what I thought most folks initially thought it would.&nbsp; When the OU + UT announcement hit, I think most people thought everything would change &amp; progress quickly, but as so in life, timing is a critical factor in business too..&nbsp; Either way, its surely to be entertaining.Enjoy your weekend Folks!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Volatility_rivals135605, post: 131746303, member: 1476288"] Ahh, if everything "insiders" ( ie writers), posted was true the world would be a strange place. They have biases & agendas too, frankly from what he said in the article, not a single data point supports his opinion, esp those that are revenue/value based, not one. Which tells me its lazy boy writing, probably needed to submit 20 lines before Ytime. :) The one line I did agree with however, it doesnt make sense for the ACC to just add WVU. If they add WVU, they need to add at least 1 more team, whether its ND or someone else. Tho in reality, that would be reversed with ND being the priority. Thats why I believe things wont progress forward(publicly), until a few more triggers occur. Much will depend on ND, but maybe they are aggressive and expand to 16 or 20 no matter what ND does, who knows. We def both agree that is the best path for security, after-all we also both realize the benefits of diversification, and if WVU does join the ACC, we also both want it to be as strong & secure as possible. This will go on for longer then what I thought most folks initially thought it would. When the OU + UT announcement hit, I think most people thought everything would change & progress quickly, but as so in life, timing is a critical factor in business too.. Either way, its surely to be entertaining. Enjoy your weekend Folks! [/QUOTE]

Name

Projecting potential conference realignment if the college sports bill's 20-team caps become law

College football's Best and Worst of September: Teams, players, coaches, games, moments & more

Heisman officials see no good options if the 24-team playoff wipes out December's window

2026 Big 12 Championship Polymarket odds entering Week 5

Touted 2028 quarterback Knox Kiffin locks in SEC visit plans

Reply to thread

Latest