Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BayoxJohn" data-source="post: 130018319" data-attributes="member: 1089254">There is nothing edgy whatsoever about a factual discussion.&nbsp; If you have any edginess, then it's simply your inability to look deeper into a subject and acknowledge there is more to the story than a single fact.&nbsp; I assure you your intimidation level exists in your mind only.&nbsp; Not for a second have I felt intimidated by you; amused perhaps but definitely not intimidated.&nbsp; If I felt intimidated by you then I would tell you about my wealth and social standing and how centered I am&nbsp; in an attempt to validate myself.&nbsp; Hey, wait a minute!&nbsp; I think I just solved a riddle!&nbsp; I have countered with many facts that you simply fail to acknowledge because it does not fit your narrative.&nbsp; You still haven't answered why the ACC approached WVU to gauge interest after Maryland left if WVU's academic reputation was a deal breaker.&nbsp; You still haven't answered why Louisville was accepted into the ACC if academics were a deal breaker.&nbsp; If you can provide factual answers, I will gladly admit I am wrong.&nbsp; Have you ever uttered those words?&nbsp; You will haven't acknowledged WVU's response of, &quot;thanks but no thanks&quot; despite your supposed knowledge of Nordberg and Pederson working to get WVU into the ACC.&nbsp; You still haven't acknowledged or accepted the skewing effects branch campuses have on academic reporting.&nbsp; It just doesn't support your narrative.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BayoxJohn, post: 130018319, member: 1089254"] There is nothing edgy whatsoever about a factual discussion. If you have any edginess, then it's simply your inability to look deeper into a subject and acknowledge there is more to the story than a single fact. I assure you your intimidation level exists in your mind only. Not for a second have I felt intimidated by you; amused perhaps but definitely not intimidated. If I felt intimidated by you then I would tell you about my wealth and social standing and how centered I am in an attempt to validate myself. Hey, wait a minute! I think I just solved a riddle! I have countered with many facts that you simply fail to acknowledge because it does not fit your narrative. You still haven't answered why the ACC approached WVU to gauge interest after Maryland left if WVU's academic reputation was a deal breaker. You still haven't answered why Louisville was accepted into the ACC if academics were a deal breaker. If you can provide factual answers, I will gladly admit I am wrong. Have you ever uttered those words? You will haven't acknowledged WVU's response of, "thanks but no thanks" despite your supposed knowledge of Nordberg and Pederson working to get WVU into the ACC. You still haven't acknowledged or accepted the skewing effects branch campuses have on academic reporting. It just doesn't support your narrative. [/QUOTE]

Name