Will Cain Show 3/36/19
- Thread starter RUOtBOtOR
- Start date
I believe Rutgers was the toughest. Is the toughest? I don't think so.
For the past few decades we had no practice facility and the athletic administration threw all available money to the football program. The only support for the basketball program came from its long-suffering fans. Things are changing now... for the better.
For the past few decades we had no practice facility and the athletic administration threw all available money to the football program. The only support for the basketball program came from its long-suffering fans. Things are changing now... for the better.
Results based data would say Rutgers has to be one of the toughest schools to win based on consecutive losing seasons and years without one NCAA bid.As to the future the practice facility and the coaching staff are positive signs for future success and that requires far better recruiting .Bottom line Rutgers must break the cycle of losing seasons next year.
I'm self aware to know that repeating "we should try not to lose" and "we'd be better if we scored more" one million times is not analysis
I have never thought this was a tough job
It became a tough job because we have an administration that didn’t properly support the program a while and we never made a significant head coach investment ...starting with even Tom young at American university
The school is now doing a better job of giving the program what it needs
It became a tough job because we have an administration that didn’t properly support the program a while and we never made a significant head coach investment ...starting with even Tom young at American university
The school is now doing a better job of giving the program what it needs
this is a very accurate list...in fact it is exactly spot on. You can change the orders around a bit depending on the year.
OK State has had plenty of success. Vandy as well. I do not think they are tough at all.
BC clearly is headed toward the bottom...10 years without a NCAA bid. They will take Rutgers place on this list going forward
I started going to Rutgers games in the fall of 1963. The number of good coaches in that period of time is shockingly small. We have won when we have had good coaching but the athletic directors have picked mediocre to lousy to personality flawed coaches on an ongoing basis.
A flagship state U in a recruiting-rich area should not even be among the 20 toughest jobs if the program is run correctly and properly funded. We’re finally on the right track... I think.
Probably the only 5 schools in power 5 not willing to pay players.