Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Scores
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
CFB Schedule
AP Poll
HSFB Rankings
NIL Valuations
Team Recruiting Rankings
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
College Football Playoff 24-team expansion talks continue with meetings in Chicago
College football Polymarket predictions: Staples’ best trades of Week 5
Senate passes Protect College Sports Act, sends bill to House
Who’s locked in — and who isn't? Easton Royal flip buzz; LSU, TCU, Ohio State, Arizona State, SMU, Houston making runs at committed prospects
David Pollack identifies what's wrong with Oklahoma QB John Mateer: 'He's broken'
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
who really cares...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darth_VadEER" data-source="post: 130614817" data-attributes="member: 1536653"><p>Only if you made them an employee and provided an income.</p><p></p><p>Even then you can't take future income. It would just be a fixed number, and universal for everyone not...not just players who might get drafted. You cant scale it based on subjective worth.</p><p></p><p>But then for it to be a deterent it would need to be unrealistically high to offset a 1st Round Pick salary, and if they tried that it would never be agreed.</p><p></p><p>This is all stupid but for discussion, you'd probaly need to end all scholarships, then provide a true salary to cover income + tuition then players actually pay the tuition then they could just withhold the money if they failed to play.</p><p></p><p>Doesnt matter, cant happen and never will happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darth_VadEER, post: 130614817, member: 1536653"] Only if you made them an employee and provided an income. Even then you can't take future income. It would just be a fixed number, and universal for everyone not...not just players who might get drafted. You cant scale it based on subjective worth. But then for it to be a deterent it would need to be unrealistically high to offset a 1st Round Pick salary, and if they tried that it would never be agreed. This is all stupid but for discussion, you'd probaly need to end all scholarships, then provide a true salary to cover income + tuition then players actually pay the tuition then they could just withhold the money if they failed to play. Doesnt matter, cant happen and never will happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3 Football
College Football Playoff 24-team expansion talks continue with meetings in Chicago
02
Sports Predictions
College football Polymarket predictions: Staples’ best trades of Week 5
03
On3 Football
Senate passes Protect College Sports Act, sends bill to House
04
Rivals Football Recruiting
Who’s locked in — and who isn't? Easton Royal flip buzz; LSU, TCU, Ohio State, Arizona State, SMU, Houston making runs at committed prospects
05
On3 Football
David Pollack identifies what's wrong with Oklahoma QB John Mateer: 'He's broken'
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
who really cares...
Top
Bottom