I believe I was 2-1I'm traveling this entire week. Who wants to give me the results from week 5?
I had utah at plus 2...it's not my fault I had to pick early and the line for BC uva was 2.5 when I picked....I don't cheat...that's left up to ambulance chasersSled cheated to win 1 game. BC was favored by 5, but geezer was the only person on the planet to have BC -2.5, and, of course, BC won by only 3. A very questionable 1-2, as both Kansas and Utah didn't come close to covering for Sled.
Are you using CBS sports for the betting lines? I'm not sure what we ended up agreeing on for all to use, unless it's simply the honor system. Obviously, you're normally not an honorable human being, but in this case, the opening line on CBS was actually BC -2.I had utah at plus 2...it's not my fault I had to pick early and the line for BC uva was 2.5 when I picked....I don't cheat...that's left up to ambulance chasers
any fan of the skunkweasels has no right to call anyone else not honorable....and if your short term memory hasn't failed it was me who suggested that we all agree on one site to use for picks but noone ever said yes or noAre you using CBS sports for the betting lines? I'm not sure what we ended up agreeing on for all to use, unless it's simply the honor system. Obviously, you're normally not an honorable human being, but in this case, the opening line on CBS was actually BC -2.
Oregon State -8.5 (cal) Alabama -3.5 (t a&m) Nebraska +3 (illinois)......if that doesn't suit anyone then bite meI'm traveling this entire week. Who wants to give me the results from week 5?
You're the dishonorable person that claimed to have gone 2-1 last week. Fortunately, King was paying attention to your outlandish lie, and called you out.any fan of the skunkweasels has no right to call anyone else not honorable....and if your short term memory hasn't failed it was me who suggested that we all agree on one site to use for picks but noone ever said yes or no
then I will say again...it's time to pick one site for everyone to useYou're the dishonorable person that claimed to have gone 2-1 last week. Fortunately, King was paying attention to your outlandish lie, and called you out.
Then you would remove the fun for those of us that enjoy calling you out for your devious ways.then I will say again...it's time to pick one site for everyone to use
That sounds reasonable. I'm probably confusing this with parlay cards, which used to be my form of gambling, albeit 40 years ago.Nope, it's called a "push" in the gambling world, and the house would return all of the money that you bet, but not pay you any extra, so calling it a tie makes sense. It's like kissing your sister or, in Slow Head's case, his wife.
we bringing families into it now?......don't make me tell them about your sheep friendNope, it's called a "push" in the gambling world, and the house would return all of the money that you bet, but not pay you any extra, so calling it a tie makes sense. It's like kissing your sister or, in Slow Head's case, his wife.
Don't 'believe' again. You were 1-2.I believe I was 2-1
I thought I won utah...must have looked at it wrongDon't 'believe' again. You were 1-2.
You lost Utah game and Kansas game. You won BC/Virginia
Don't 'believe' again. You were 1-2.
You lost Utah game and Kansas game. You won BC/Virginia
I had done all of this already. You posted that you were busy traveling, so I calculated last week's results and the updated records in this very thread yesterday morning (see above). I think you've read too many of Slow Head's brain-dead posts and it's dropped your IQ by about 50 points.week 5 results are under the Week 5 string. Tony back on track with an undefeated week
as posted above oregon state -8.5 (cal)......alabama -3.5 t a&m) Nebraska +3 (illinois)I'm traveling this entire week. Who wants to give me the results from week 5?
lol... I'm brain dead from this conference.I had done all of this already. You posted that you were busy traveling, so I calculated last week's results and the updated records in this very thread yesterday morning (see above). I think you've read too many of Slow Head's brain-dead posts and it's dropped your IQ by about 50 points.
"bloviating"?.......looks like your evening GED classes are doing some good after all...my congratulationsI'm as guilty as others, but perhaps it would make things easier to score the weekly results if we simply posted our picks in the weekly thread, and referred to slow sled as a cheating, bloviating jerk in a separate thread.
should i point out to Snow that you made 1 pick that was the same as mine? His head is going to explodeI'm as guilty as others, but perhaps it would make things easier to score the weekly results if we simply posted our picks in the weekly thread, and referred to slow sled as a cheating, bloviating jerk in a separate thread.
no...when it comes to mherd you must consider the source....it's got to be something in that michigan watershould i point out to Snow that you made 1 pick that was the same as mine? His head is going to explode
I tried using that logic last year, due to my hatred of Michigan State, and ended up being wrong about four straight weeks. Now trying to pick small spread games, basically toss-up games, picking who I think will win outright.Maryland +20 (Ohio State) reverse psychology/jinx
Michigan -19 (Minnesota) more reverse psychology/jinx
Arizona/USC UNDER 72 points