We were probably there anyway, but..

[patdog]

Speed in the outfield is underrated. With Mangum and Robson both out there, it's hard for opposing hitters to get a ball to drop.

 

[57stratdawg]

Based juiced to start the 8th. No outs.

 

[57stratdawg]

Back to back Ks. Gridley up

 

[coach66]

Yea, get that **** out of here. It's time

To grind Rugb. Salt grinding book farming from here to
the national finals.

 

[Big Magee]

What is wrong about "State has never won the SEC West since the SEC went to divisions in 1992?" I'll hang up and lis
ten.

Because you are wrong. SEC baseball was split into divisions long before 1992. What is so hard to understand about that? There was an SEC West and and SEC East in baseball between 1953 and 1985. Read a damn history book. The SEC did not begin in 1992 and MSU won several western division titles during that time.

 

[121Josey]

Because you are wrong. SEC baseball was split into divisions long before 1992. What is so hard to understand about that? There was an SEC West and and SEC East in baseball between 1953 and 1985. Read a damn history book. The SEC did not begin in 1992 and MSU won several western division titles during that time.

Sorry that they didn't teach you English syntax in grammar school. "Since" you lack basic English reading comprehension (in a damn history book), I'm out.

 

[Big Magee]

Because you can't say "since" the SEC went to divisions in 1992 jackass. SEC baseball was already split into divisions between 1953 and 1985. How does syntax benefit your arguement jackass?

 

[bartgregory]

Was the SEC divided into divisions in 1991? No. We went to a 12 teams, 2 division format in 1992. The statement on air was "the only team to not win a division tournament since the league went to division format in 1992." That's a correct statement. And I'll stand by that statement. Because it's right.

 

[121Josey]

Because you can't say "since" the SEC went to divisions in 1992 jackass. SEC baseball was already split into divisions between 1953 and 1985. How does syntax benefit your arguement jackass?

So the SEC didn't exist 1986-1991? (that's A.D. or C.E. "since" you are such a historical dubmass). You should read a damn history book. C'mon man.

 

[Big Magee]

Was the SEC divided into divisions in 1991? No. We went to a 12 teams, 2 division format in 1992. The statement on air was "the only team to not win a division tournament since the league went to division format in 1992." That's a correct statement. And I'll stand by that statement. Because it's right.

Sorry Bart - your are dead wrong. You are using the "since 1992" for arguementa sake. You said MSU hasn't won a western division title on air. You might be correct in your "statement" but as a broadcaster, why wouldnt you point out the fact that the league was split into divisions well before the 1992 expansion. It's almost an "intersting factoid"'for listeners and younger viewers. Why don't you mention that on air tomorrow.

 

[Big Magee]

Thought you were "out" *****. Bart and Greg said on air that MSU "has not won a western division title" and that is dead *** wrong. Oh, and your syntax arguement is still wrong.

 

[121Josey]

Thought you were "out" *****. Bart and Greg said on air that MSU "has not won a western division title" and that is dead *** wrong. Oh, and your syntax arguement is still wrong.

I was "out" but "since" you keep responding, I can't help keeping you writing "since" you are a historical dubmass. Did you not understand Bart's post (that your replied to)?

Shirley you understand that the red line under "arguement" indicates that you have potentially misspelled that word. You are literally a dubmass.

Because you can't say "since" the SEC went to divisions in 1992 jackass. SEC baseball was already split into divisions between 1953 and 1985. How does syntax benefit your arguement jackass?

 

[Big Magee]

I was "out" but "since" you keep responding, I can't help keeping you writing "since" you are a historical dubmass. Did you not understand Bart's post (that your replied to)?

Shirley you understand that the red line under "arguement" indicates that you have potentially misspelled that word. You are literally a dubmass.

Grammar police - nice. And using dubmass is cute as well because that was funny on this board circa 2006. And Shirely - wow, you know funny one liners from Airplane - another sign that you are truly a message board hero. Way to go.

I remember now why I quit posting on here many many years ago. Thanks for the reminder toolbag. And yes I understand Bart's post, that doesnt make him right. He was wrong on air, he is wrong now. Same as you. MSU has won multiple western division championships "since" the conference was split into divisions, which was 1953. If you want to talk correct syntax he should have say said since the conference split "aGAIN" in 1992. (Hey look, I used 2004 SPS jargain that time, so do I fit in now like youre dubmass?"

 

[Miketice]

mind numbing....

where we'd be if we had a coach that knew anything about hitting, or baseball in general?****

possibilities for sure**

 

[bartgregory]

Man. I normally leave these things alone, but I'm having a tough time with this one. And I certainly don't think I'm "dead wrong" with stating Mississippi State hasn't won a division title since 1992, when the the SEC went to two, 6-team divisions. As for it being an "interesting factoid", yes it was. Broadcasts are full of them. It's the same as saying a guy is 24 for his last 50 since April 23. It doesn't discredit what he did before then, just gives you the facts from a certain point. So, to be honest, if I were broadcasting the game today (which I'm not), I might say the exact same thing I said Thursday night for two reasons. I think it's worth mentioning because it's valid, and I like to aggravate.

 

[KurtRambis4]

I don't have a

dog in the hunt, but if he said we haven't won a division title since the league changed in '92, he's right. He's not saying we haven't EVER won one, just not since the format changed in 92.

 

[katfsh]

Shirley you understand that the red line under "arguement" indicates that you have potentially misspelled that word. You are literally a dubmass.

Who is "Shirley"?