Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hbeacheer" data-source="post: 129827950" data-attributes="member: 1484608">Did you just bring facts up here?&nbsp; Not allowed, you should know that by now. Of course It's easy for gregor frenchy to say a schedule is easy&nbsp; while he's sitting on his fat *** eating bon bons and cheesy poofs all day.QUOTE=&quot;Chazz Michael Michaels, post: 1447084, member: 4184&quot;]&quot;Joke schedule&quot;.&nbsp; Ah, the tired, misinformed refrain of Dana haters and crybabies alike.This has been debunked.&nbsp;&nbsp; End of season strength of schedule numbers have proved this is false.&nbsp; Yet you haters and crybabies still use it. Try to keep up.&nbsp; The SOS for this year was more difficult than any other double digit win season at wvu since before 1988 (i.e. Tougher than even 1988 1993 2005 2006 2007).Give it a rest 10-3.&nbsp; Ranked in top 20.<a href="https://www.google.com/amp/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2017/1/10/14222592/college-football-rankings-top-25-2016-final-ap-poll?client=safari">https://www.google.com/amp/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2017/1/10/14222592/college-football-rankings-top-25-2016-final-ap-poll?client=safari</a>And you're calling other people idiots and morons on here.&nbsp; Nice. You've been exposed.And talking about who's trending where...Yup enjoy that ACC irrelevant basement, Dude.WVU, ranked in both major sports.&nbsp; Pitt?&nbsp; Nope.Wvu SOS was 26. Pitt 21.&nbsp; Hardly a huge difference.<a href="https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other">https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other</a></blockquote>[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="hbeacheer, post: 129827950, member: 1484608"] Did you just bring facts up here? Not allowed, you should know that by now. Of course It's easy for gregor frenchy to say a schedule is easy while he's sitting on his fat *** eating bon bons and cheesy poofs all day. QUOTE="Chazz Michael Michaels, post: 1447084, member: 4184"]"Joke schedule". Ah, the tired, misinformed refrain of Dana haters and crybabies alike. This has been debunked. End of season strength of schedule numbers have proved this is false. Yet you haters and crybabies still use it. Try to keep up. The SOS for this year was more difficult than any other double digit win season at wvu since before 1988 (i.e. Tougher than even 1988 1993 2005 2006 2007). Give it a rest 10-3. Ranked in top 20. [URL]https://www.google.com/amp/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2017/1/10/14222592/college-football-rankings-top-25-2016-final-ap-poll?client=safari[/URL] And you're calling other people idiots and morons on here. Nice. You've been exposed. And talking about who's trending where... Yup enjoy that ACC irrelevant basement, Dude. WVU, ranked in both major sports. Pitt? Nope. Wvu SOS was 26. Pitt 21. Hardly a huge difference. [URL]https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other[/URL][/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]

Name