UALR -5

ctt8410

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2003
6,845
3,872
0
Seems a little high, but we've always struggled in Little Rock. I think both teams are pretty even on a neutral court.
 

hotterthanyourhusbandTU

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2003
3,204
1,603
61
Still not sure how good we are, because the ole Beavers and (Titans) are really bad.

However, there has been improvement!

Tomorrow will definitely be a test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW

Weatherdemon

All-American
Staff member
Sep 11, 2001
22,074
6,734
113
This is a big game IMO.
We struggle there but this young team has some confidence.
I don't expect a W but think we can get one if we don't get frustrated and try too hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gmoney4WW

Tulsafanzz

All-Conference
Apr 21, 2006
6,907
4,490
113
I hate this series. I'm not sure why we keep playing UALR. I hope we can pull off the win tomorrow. After last year, we owe them !
 

mcane

All-Conference
Dec 3, 2003
8,457
2,682
112
I too expected a 2-3 point line. 5 suggests Vegas recognizes that Oregon State and ORU are bad teams. I though ORU played very well up until the 15 minute mark left in the game and simply ran out of gas. But, then ORU stinked it up at Oakland with repeated turnovers and poor defense.

This game always frustrates me - and I still don't understand why TU continues this series. If we want a game 6 hours away for a bus ride there are other choices - UMKC; North Texas, UT Arlington.

Anyway, I think this game is pivotal to a more successful season than I expected at the start.
 

hotterthanyourhusbandTU

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2003
3,204
1,603
61
Agree...I don't like this series, either...there's nothing similar about these two universities to have an extended, recurring series.

I can think of 15-20 other mid major programs I would rather have a recurring series with...
 

ctt8410

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2003
6,845
3,872
0
The problem I have with this series is the committee doesn't respect the difficulty of games at places like Little Rock. We really need our 1:1 deals to be with Valley, A10, and MWC teams. And the bottom of the B12/SEC when possible. The KState game next year is a good start.
 

Gold*

Heisman
Dec 3, 2003
63,017
11,734
0
I'm not against playing them per se, but yeah, there are a lot of other teams we could play. Why aren't we playing Mo State? Hell, let's play Rice.
 

Barlass

Senior
Mar 1, 2004
2,861
635
0
This year seems like the first time in quite awhile that we haven't played Mo State. Did we exchange them for Ill State? Is it against the rules to play more than 2 Valley teams in one season?
 

TU_BLA

Heisman
Mar 8, 2012
29,576
13,860
113
This is about the same exact way the game went last year. TU jumped out to a fast start and UALR went on a good run towards the end of the half to get it close and then ran away in the 2nd half and our offense went dead. Seems we are stagnant right now and UALR not missing.
 

goldfan83

Junior
Aug 19, 2005
1,614
217
0
The problem I have with this series is the committee doesn't respect the difficulty of games at places like Little Rock. We really need our 1:1 deals to be with Valley, A10, and MWC teams. And the bottom of the B12/SEC when possible. The KState game next year is a good start.


100% agree with CTT and gold here