Seton Hall 76 RUTGERS 62 in front of an actual crowd of 6,058
bac2therac Hall of Famer Jul 30, 2001 248,469 178,082 113 Dec 4, 2015 #1 Seton Hall 76 RUTGERS 62 in front of an actual crowd of 6,058
Sweet Pea's Corner All-American Sep 10, 2001 17,837 5,694 113 Dec 4, 2015 #2 Seton Hall 88 Rutgers 61
C ColonelRutgers All-American Dec 15, 2003 7,109 9,300 113 Dec 4, 2015 #3 SHU 81 RU 60 Actual fannies in seats: 5,093
M mal359 All-Conference Nov 21, 2013 4,557 1,246 40 Dec 4, 2015 #4 Rutgers 118 Seton Hall 1 Reactions: Sir ScarletKnight
G Greene Rice FIG Heisman Dec 30, 2005 40,437 23,613 0 Dec 4, 2015 #5 RU 76 SHU 65 Everything clicks. Reactions: RU at the shore
R RUJMM78 Heisman Jul 25, 2001 26,232 12,494 113 Dec 4, 2015 #7 Without Freemen Rutgers simply lacks enough scoring threads. Seton Hall 73 - Rutgers 60 Attendance 5683
Without Freemen Rutgers simply lacks enough scoring threads. Seton Hall 73 - Rutgers 60 Attendance 5683
F FELONIOUSMONK All-American Apr 1, 2012 11,909 5,090 0 Dec 4, 2015 #8 Seton Hall by a bunch with a virtual crowd of 5000
R RU at the shore All-Conference Dec 31, 2005 4,836 1,668 0 Dec 5, 2015 #10 I just don't like how the winds are blowing here right now : Shoe 76 Rut 54
G Greene Rice FIG Heisman Dec 30, 2005 40,437 23,613 0 Dec 5, 2015 #12 SHU is -5.5 in LV. Spread similar to WF
R RutgersJoe Freshman Mar 9, 2012 1,070 95 0 Dec 5, 2015 #13 Throw out the stats for this one. I say 69-67 good guys.
PatrickRU92 Heisman Aug 1, 2001 42,155 16,810 82 Dec 5, 2015 #15 we can't score much WITH Freeman. Unfortunately SHOE can score RU 90 SHOE 18
Caliknight Hall of Famer Sep 21, 2001 196,640 148,748 113 Dec 5, 2015 #16 I know nothing about Shoe, nor do I want to. I know we are a poor team though. RU 52 Shoe 68
