Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Scores
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
Live
HSFB Scores
CFB Schedule
TV Guide
HSFB Rankings
AP Poll
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
Could Florida State be ready to move off Mike Norvell if Miami game goes awry?
Dan Lanning and Mike Elko made huge coaching mistakes, can they dig out this season?
JaMarcus Shephard has brought swagger back to Oregon State and now the real challenge begins
Greg Sankey: SEC 'prepared to engage' in self-governance discussions if Protect College Sports Act fails
Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor expected to miss LSU game
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
The Badass Big 12
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129580034" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>Adding two G5 schools would increase Texas' revenue and reach beyond what they are today and also give them a stronger and more stable conference as other members achieved more equitable revenues as they do in all the other conferences. It would also set them up for a lucrative future tv contract.</p><p></p><p>Texas didn't want to expand WITH ANYONE--but you can't get that through your thick head. They want control.</p><p>In a ten team conference requiring 8 votes to get things passed, they have it. Add two more schools and they lose control.</p><p></p><p>You continue to whine and moan and lie about schools like Cincinnati and UConn and forget that OKLAHOMA was at the forefront of pushing for positive changes with these schools. You also ignore that when OU leaves because the conference has many members millions behind other schools and even OU also has lost position from where they are today and the conference has remained at a competitive disadvantage and been left out of the playoff as a result several times-and theres been negative exposure for years and little chance of a better tv network--WVU isn't going to have to worry about schools like OU and UT because they will never play them again after theyve moved on.</p><p></p><p>Its been UTs plan all along--keep the conference as is until they decide which way to go. As long as they are top dog financially they are great. As soon as it changes (and it will before 2025) then suddenly, letting go of the LHN will be ok (as long as its in another conference). OU tried, but couldn't get past UT's control of other schools.</p><p></p><p>When WVU's schedule is FILLED with the Cincinnati's, UConn's , Temple's, SMU's etc. perhaps you'll understand, but I doubt it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129580034, member: 1428007"] Adding two G5 schools would increase Texas' revenue and reach beyond what they are today and also give them a stronger and more stable conference as other members achieved more equitable revenues as they do in all the other conferences. It would also set them up for a lucrative future tv contract. Texas didn't want to expand WITH ANYONE--but you can't get that through your thick head. They want control. In a ten team conference requiring 8 votes to get things passed, they have it. Add two more schools and they lose control. You continue to whine and moan and lie about schools like Cincinnati and UConn and forget that OKLAHOMA was at the forefront of pushing for positive changes with these schools. You also ignore that when OU leaves because the conference has many members millions behind other schools and even OU also has lost position from where they are today and the conference has remained at a competitive disadvantage and been left out of the playoff as a result several times-and theres been negative exposure for years and little chance of a better tv network--WVU isn't going to have to worry about schools like OU and UT because they will never play them again after theyve moved on. Its been UTs plan all along--keep the conference as is until they decide which way to go. As long as they are top dog financially they are great. As soon as it changes (and it will before 2025) then suddenly, letting go of the LHN will be ok (as long as its in another conference). OU tried, but couldn't get past UT's control of other schools. When WVU's schedule is FILLED with the Cincinnati's, UConn's , Temple's, SMU's etc. perhaps you'll understand, but I doubt it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3 Football
Could Florida State be ready to move off Mike Norvell if Miami game goes awry?
02
On3 Football
Dan Lanning and Mike Elko made huge coaching mistakes, can they dig out this season?
03
On3 Football
JaMarcus Shephard has brought swagger back to Oregon State and now the real challenge begins
04
On3 NIL
Greg Sankey: SEC 'prepared to engage' in self-governance discussions if Protect College Sports Act fails
05
On3 Football
Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor expected to miss LSU game
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
The Badass Big 12
Top
Bottom