Terrence Clarke

Eastkybball

All-Conference
May 7, 2019
1,547
2,828
98
I can’t find any full games of his to watch on YouTube. Anyone know where I can find some?

I’ve watched Boston’s games and he is without a doubt the player I’m most excited about. I’ve heard that Boston and Clarke can easily go get a basket anytime. A lot of people even hype Clarke is better than BJ but I don’t see how.
 

BLUEVADER

All-Conference
Jun 18, 2015
2,515
2,063
3
Boston growing to 6'8" has put him top 5 player in nation if any or the services do not recognize it. That being said Him and CLARKE on the wings or even the 3-4 in a small ball lineup is going to wreck teams next year. If IQ and Sestina return and we land 1 more solid true big hopefully Grad Transfer no doubt in my mind we are a Top 3 team if not #1 team in America. Next year's UK team will boat race, route ,destroy, molest, just about anyone in nation next year. The talent length and the defensive potential might be Cal's best when all said and done. I really hope NCAA grants the seniors who want another go at March madness. We will Have played Like Sestina coming off bench next year. It has potential to be one of Cal's deepest outside the Platoon team. Only player I'm not sold on is WARE just as a freshman but can see by JR- SR year what he could bring.. Hopefully we land 1 more solid Big to add to this Class cause the athleticism and length might be best in nation. Our 2-3 will be 6'6" and 6'8". I thought Clarke would play the 3 but with Boston shooting up to 6'8" he moves to 3 and Clarke goes to 2. Then honesty Hagan's should actually return as well. If HAGANS, IQ, returns then KENTUCKY will be first team that has a chance to be AP #1 TEAM and become 1st ever Wire to Wire NCAA champs holding the #1 ranking all season. They will be the most DOMINANT team in the game. I mean who comes off the bench if HAGANS, IQ, BOSTON, CLARKE, ASKEW are on Roster. That is just filthiness upon the hardwood like never seen before in the history of the game. Teams like ku,ul,puke,UNC, would dream of having that insane talent 1-3 spots and I'm sure I am missing a player or 2.
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,574
68,161
113
Boston growing to 6'8" has put him top 5 player in nation if any or the services do not recognize it. That being said Him and CLARKE on the wings or even the 3-4 in a small ball lineup is going to wreck teams next year. If IQ and Sestina return and we land 1 more solid true big hopefully Grad Transfer no doubt in my mind we are a Top 3 team if not #1 team in America. Next year's UK team will boat race, route ,destroy, molest, just about anyone in nation next year. The talent length and the defensive potential might be Cal's best when all said and done. I really hope NCAA grants the seniors who want another go at March madness. We will Have played Like Sestina coming off bench next year. It has potential to be one of Cal's deepest outside the Platoon team. Only player I'm not sold on is WARE just as a freshman but can see by JR- SR year what he could bring.. Hopefully we land 1 more solid Big to add to this Class cause the athleticism and length might be best in nation. Our 2-3 will be 6'6" and 6'8". I thought Clarke would play the 3 but with Boston shooting up to 6'8" he moves to 3 and Clarke goes to 2. Then honesty Hagan's should actually return as well. If HAGANS, IQ, returns then KENTUCKY will be first team that has a chance to be AP #1 TEAM and become 1st ever Wire to Wire NCAA champs holding the #1 ranking all season. They will be the most DOMINANT team in the game. I mean who comes off the bench if HAGANS, IQ, BOSTON, CLARKE, ASKEW are on Roster. That is just filthiness upon the hardwood like never seen before in the history of the game. Teams like ku,ul,puke,UNC, would dream of having that insane talent 1-3 spots and I'm sure I am missing a player or 2.
Hagans won’t be back but everything else is spot on if next season is like 2015 and we’re 31-0 to finish the season I GUARANTEE cal won’t mess it up this time
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,501
70,703
113
From what I have seen of Clarke, he's got more meanness and tenacity in his game, he's a legit dog. He'll probably struggle with fouls for a while, especially once SEC refs step on the court, but I look forward to watching him get to the rack off the bounce when he gets isolated with one defender.

That said, Boston is loooong, that kid has a serious reach and appears to get what he wants.

UK would be a problem for most teams if we just had 1 of these guys, the fact that we have both is very exciting to me. Get IQ and EJ back and I don't know how defenses can keep UK under 80ppg.
 
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
I can’t find any full games of his to watch on YouTube. Anyone know where I can find some?

I’ve watched Boston’s games and he is without a doubt the player I’m most excited about. I’ve heard that Boston and Clarke can easily go get a basket anytime. A lot of people even hype Clarke is better than BJ but I don’t see how.

interesting. I watched only one of Boston’s games, and was not impressed at all.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,932
88,383
98
Clarke’s an RJ Barrett type without the selfishness. He’s a damn good scorer with superb handle and finish, and should be an elite defender as well.

UK with Quick, Boston, Clarke, Brooks and Montgomery could pretty much switch everything on D.
 

nickhorvathsuxazz

All-American
Jul 21, 2015
5,777
8,938
0
It's got potential to be like the ol' batman/robin days of anderson/mercer. Downhill attack on the basket from both wings...w/ a deadly shooter orchestrating, just in case the defense tries to sluff off from up top.

Can't wait. With the early end to this season, BBN will be like a pack of starving dogs by the time october gets here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatfanMike47

Cowtown Cat

Heisman
Aug 23, 2015
23,984
54,388
100
Clarke’s an RJ Barrett type without the selfishness. He’s a damn good scorer with superb handle and finish, and should be an elite defender as well.

UK with Quick, Boston, Clarke, Brooks and Montgomery could pretty much switch everything on D.
He is but I think he’s better than Barrett. He has the potential to be a much better shooter. His attitude and demeanor is more becoming than that of Barrett. Barrett has a terrible attitude and is very selfish. Dude’s a *****.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,932
88,383
98
He is but I think he’s better than Barrett. He has the potential to be a much better shooter. His attitude and demeanor is more becoming than that of Barrett. Barrett has a terrible attitude and is very selfish. Dude’s a *****.

I don’t like Barrett either but we are talking about a guy who averaged 23/8/4 as a freshman, so we’ll see if he’s better.
 

Cowtown Cat

Heisman
Aug 23, 2015
23,984
54,388
100
I don’t like Barrett either but we are talking about a guy who averaged 23/8/4 as a freshman, so we’ll see if he’s better.
Yeah with Zion and Reddish on the same team. My goodness, with the attention paid to Zion I could’ve averaged 23 points a game. [laughing]

EDIT: Take Zion off that team and I don’t see him putting up those type of numbers.
 

jrpross_rivals

Heisman
Feb 21, 2008
17,545
36,058
113
I don’t like Barrett either but we are talking about a guy who averaged 23/8/4 as a freshman, so we’ll see if he’s better.
I was actually going to make the same comparison. Uber athletic, wired to score, crafty ways of getting his shot off, good passer. Barrett was actually a great rebounder for his size, not sure if Clarke will be able to do that as well.
 

ScrooDook92

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2019
1,772
1,231
0
Boston growing to 6'8" has put him top 5 player in nation if any or the services do not recognize it. That being said Him and CLARKE on the wings or even the 3-4 in a small ball lineup is going to wreck teams next year. If IQ and Sestina return and we land 1 more solid true big hopefully Grad Transfer no doubt in my mind we are a Top 3 team if not #1 team in America. Next year's UK team will boat race, route ,destroy, molest, just about anyone in nation next year. The talent length and the defensive potential might be Cal's best when all said and done. I really hope NCAA grants the seniors who want another go at March madness. We will Have played Like Sestina coming off bench next year. It has potential to be one of Cal's deepest outside the Platoon team. Only player I'm not sold on is WARE just as a freshman but can see by JR- SR year what he could bring.. Hopefully we land 1 more solid Big to add to this Class cause the athleticism and length might be best in nation. Our 2-3 will be 6'6" and 6'8". I thought Clarke would play the 3 but with Boston shooting up to 6'8" he moves to 3 and Clarke goes to 2. Then honesty Hagan's should actually return as well. If HAGANS, IQ, returns then KENTUCKY will be first team that has a chance to be AP #1 TEAM and become 1st ever Wire to Wire NCAA champs holding the #1 ranking all season. They will be the most DOMINANT team in the game. I mean who comes off the bench if HAGANS, IQ, BOSTON, CLARKE, ASKEW are on Roster. That is just filthiness upon the hardwood like never seen before in the history of the game. Teams like ku,ul,puke,UNC, would dream of having that insane talent 1-3 spots and I'm sure I am missing a player or 2.
No doubt next year's team is looking to have a great mixture of talent and experience, but when (besides 2014-15) have Cal's teams done these sorts of things you mention?
 

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
29,649
41,901
102
Yeah with Zion and Reddish on the same team. My goodness, with the attention paid to Zion I could’ve averaged 23 points a game. [laughing]

EDIT: Take Zion off that team and I don’t see him putting up those type of numbers.
I still don't see how in the hell that team didn't even make it to the final four , lol . And they were very lucky to even get as far as they did .
 

rockout1

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2012
1,311
1,805
0
From what I have seen of Clarke, he's got more meanness and tenacity in his game, he's a legit dog. He'll probably struggle with fouls for a while, especially once SEC refs step on the court, but I look forward to watching him get to the rack off the bounce when he gets isolated with one defender.

That said, Boston is loooong, that kid has a serious reach and appears to get what he wants.

UK would be a problem for most teams if we just had 1 of these guys, the fact that we have both is very exciting to me. Get IQ and EJ back and I don't know how defenses can keep UK under 80ppg.
I love Cal but he will be the one to hold them under 80 points...he’d rather grind.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
G Quickley
G Clarke
G Boston
F Brooks
F Montgomery

If that happens we should have the best starting five in the nation.

Heck, even if Montgomery bolts, those four and Jackson/Ware inside will be tough to handle. Scoring at four of the five positions. As long as the big guys rebound and play defense we are set.
 
May 4, 2009
5,370
325
0
interesting. I watched only one of Boston’s games, and was not impressed at all.
The games and tapes I’ve seen of him didn’t leave me with your impression. The guy is an absolute stud player. Going to be great. He’s UK’s best recruit next year. This kid is a no-miss recruit who will live up to his billing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZaytovenCat

AllBall

All-American
May 5, 2015
4,387
5,590
93
From what I have seen of Clarke, he's got more meanness and tenacity in his game, he's a legit dog. He'll probably struggle with fouls for a while, especially once SEC refs step on the court, but I look forward to watching him get to the rack off the bounce when he gets isolated with one defender.

That said, Boston is loooong, that kid has a serious reach and appears to get what he wants.

UK would be a problem for most teams if we just had 1 of these guys, the fact that we have both is very exciting to me. Get IQ and EJ back and I don't know how defenses can keep UK under 80ppg.
Giggity!!!
 

AllBall

All-American
May 5, 2015
4,387
5,590
93
G Quickley
G Clarke
G Boston
F Brooks
F Montgomery

If that happens we should have the best starting five in the nation.

Heck, even if Montgomery bolts, those four and Jackson/Ware inside will be tough to handle. Scoring at four of the five positions. As long as the big guys rebound and play defense we are set.
Keeping IQ and Montgomery would be the best thing to happen to UK basketball since the NBA lockout. I'd compare it to keeping Lamb and Jones to a lesser degree.
 

fatguy87

All-American
Oct 8, 2004
13,764
9,093
0
G Quickley
G Clarke
G Boston
F Brooks
F Montgomery

If that happens we should have the best starting five in the nation.

Heck, even if Montgomery bolts, those four and Jackson/Ware inside will be tough to handle. Scoring at four of the five positions. As long as the big guys rebound and play defense we are set.

Shooting is the biggest question mark, like most seasons, with that lineup. Quickley can fill it up, but there is uncertainty regarding the jump shot aptitude of Boston and Clarke.

When do we start convincing ourselves that this team will buck all the trends of almost every team Cal has had and this will be a "good" shooting team? Funny how it happens almost every season.

'Anyway, it looks to be a traditional Calipari lineup. Getting to the free throw line, taking care of the ball, and hitting the offensive glass will be the team's bread and butter. The defensive ceiling is definitely higher with this group than the previous due to the bigger players at the guard positions.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,139
98,041
113
Shooting is the biggest question mark, like most seasons, with that lineup. Quickley can fill it up, but there is uncertainty regarding the jump shot aptitude of Boston and Clarke.

When do we start convincing ourselves that this team will buck all the trends of almost every team Cal has had and this will be a "good" shooting team? Funny how it happens almost every season.

'Anyway, it looks to be a traditional Calipari lineup. Getting to the free throw line, taking care of the ball, and hitting the offensive glass will be the team's bread and butter. The defensive ceiling is definitely higher with this group than the previous due to the bigger players at the guard positions.

My hope is that Juzang actually develops into a 36-40% three point shooter.
 

ZaytovenCat

All-American
Apr 25, 2013
23,889
8,432
97
Shooting is the biggest question mark, like most seasons, with that lineup. Quickley can fill it up, but there is uncertainty regarding the jump shot aptitude of Boston and Clarke.

When do we start convincing ourselves that this team will buck all the trends of almost every team Cal has had and this will be a "good" shooting team? Funny how it happens almost every season.

'Anyway, it looks to be a traditional Calipari lineup. Getting to the free throw line, taking care of the ball, and hitting the offensive glass will be the team's bread and butter. The defensive ceiling is definitely higher with this group than the previous due to the bigger players at the guard positions.
Haven’t seen Clarke but I’ve seen Boston plenty. Won’t surprise me one bit if he shoots 40%+ from 3 next year. And he has range for days. It’s what he does.