RU was exhausted

bdodger3

Junior
Mar 19, 2017
159
314
0
I call ********. We didn’t look exhausted. That’s just sports talk. We were playing with juice and energy. As much, if not more then the well rested Purdue squad.

I agree ScarletKid - rather than exhausting is the first two games got us into an excellent game rhythm. Excellent job by the team and the staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JERSEYROOTS

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
I say bs to your comment--there's no excuses but if you were close to the bench at game you would agree
 

rufeelinit

All-Conference
May 16, 2010
12,647
4,351
0
The only evidence I saw of fatigue was that late in the game we did not close well on some of their three point shots. They made the shots but in some cases we did not contest as we did earlier.
 

RUBigFrank

All-Conference
Jun 9, 2003
2,858
1,765
113
Statistically it was the three point shooting that was the difference

Some we're well defended and some five feet beyond the arc- amazing!
 

G- RUnit

All-American
Sep 13, 2004
14,372
7,975
113
We did not look tired at all. That wasn’t it. A Top 5 team shot 43% from three point land.
We brought our A game. Sweet to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDead and satnom

MV9000

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2016
2,949
4,058
46
Bad take. Absolutely not the case and the players said it themselves.

3 ball killed us. Believe we outscored on second chance points 20-2 or something along those lines.
 
May 29, 2001
24
22
0
Both teams leveraged their strengths. 43% is our average from 3. You guys murdered us on the offensive glass. The difference was basically the number of offensive weapons. What do you guys have coming in next year to help in that regard?
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,593
177,316
113
I do not think RU was tired at all. Some teams come in the third game and get worn down as the game goes on but I think RU was actually playing off the adrenaline from the previous two nights. I think today at 4:30 would have been where the fatigue could start to set in especially in the 2nd half
 

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,430
17,484
81
I don’t know if I would say exhausted. If we lost by twenty and the shooting was off, then I’d say we were exhausted. Was fatigue a factor? Yes, but we made a lot big shots. Purdue just made more
 
  • Like
Reactions: satnom

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,115
8,402
113
It's not like Purdue had a bad game. They brought their A game. And that game could have went either way.
 

BigLou

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
11,569
2,877
63
I don' think we played like we were tired. Still shot well in the 2nd half. We improved with each game - Wednesday was not a great looking game but we survived. Somewhere in the 2st half of the Indiana game we turned it around and played our best ball of the season for the rest of Thursday and Friday.
 

FastMJ

All-American
Jan 6, 2007
33,933
6,619
68
I do think fatigue came into play in the last 5 minutes of the game. Not deciding factor, but still a factor.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,206
12,468
113
Radio analyst Joe Boylan kept saying Rutgers needs to make more shots to win league games .He was right prior to the B1G Tournament and surely during the games where Rutgers showed higher levels of scoring.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
I said the tiredness was not an excuse(reason) for the lost--but they were
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
The vast majority of posts disagree including me based on eye test and the players said no. I heard it too.

Being somewhat tired is part of the game.

The 1 point I think it DID impact was when their coach P. called 1 of his three remaining TOs before Corey shorted his foul shot. He froze him a bit there. Having him wait definitely brought the adrenaline level down.