RU vs Wake Forest 11/17/2016

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,299
176,981
113
I didnt even know there was a game....55-32 in the 4th..wow its not even about winning games anymore because RU seriously could only win 2 or 3, its about even being competitive.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,195
12,454
113
The absence of offensive scoring threats without Scaife is readily apparent.
 

Turtle31

Junior
Mar 2, 2003
906
223
0
55-43 loss. I don't know what kind of team Wake is this year, so unclear if this could be characterized as a "good" loss or not.
 

RUsince52

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2016
6,821
2,046
0
55-43 loss. I don't know what kind of team Wake is this year, so unclear if this could be characterized as a "good" loss or not.
Looks like we will be losing a lot and none will be good. However, we only had 2 less 3 pointers than WF. When you can't score at least 50, you're not going to win.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,409
16,248
113
55-43 loss. I don't know what kind of team Wake is this year, so unclear if this could be characterized as a "good" loss or not.
Any loss after losing the first two has to be considered a bad loss.
WF was picked by the ACC Coaches to finish 11 in the ACC this season
Last season they finished 17-16 (6-10 conference > 10th place)) losing in the 2nd round of the WNIT.
 
Jul 26, 2001
3,543
688
0
Wake Forest isn't as dreadful as they once were, but no one is confusing them with a powerhouse, either.

I'm not being smart, that is pretty much as accurate a description as can be made.