Post- Game Thoughts

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,507
20,870
113
So I’m in Chicago, headed to a concert and didn’t get to watch the game as close as I would have liked. But did see it. What were your observations?

To me it was mostly good stuff. Only real issues I noticed were Hartzog got picked on a little and Fidone seemed to struggle both blocking and passing. Also kicking game is still probably a question. But the most complete game we’ve had in a while.
 
Aug 6, 2009
15,511
9,089
0
Looked solid across the board. But I agree about Fidone and the kicking game.
However, it was great to see us actually returning kicks again!
 

Joedaly

Sophomore
Nov 15, 2014
1,022
164
0
I like the fact that we have a run game where our QB won’t have to be our leading rusher too.
 

c3o

Sophomore
Apr 24, 2018
6,586
133
0
You could nitpick it to death. Not perfect by any means. But here’s what I liked :

- we converted a 2nd and 30
- we had a rocket catch in coverage with a Sasquatch WR and a perfectly thrown ball away from the defender
- our running game looked good. One fumble but that was a damn good helmet hit on the ball
- I was actually not scared when we dropped back by about midway second Q. In fact, I wanted to see more passinf
- our defense was fine. The TD was a bad *** pass and Hartzog just isn’t tall. He is a gamer tho
- special teams looked better but still need work

Oh, and HH came in and actually looked crisp.
 

BugsAreQualityProtein

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2021
2,568
1,220
103
Fidone is concerning, there were several runs that could have went for big yards if he blocked the perimeter better. He also looked slow and couldn’t produce yards after catch. TE now seems to be the biggest question mark on offense.
 
Feb 2, 2005
601
6
0
So I’m in Chicago, headed to a concert and didn’t get to watch the game as close as I would have liked. But did see it. What were your observations?

To me it was mostly good stuff. Only real issues I noticed were Hartzog got picked on a little and Fidone seemed to struggle both blocking and passing. Also kicking game is still probably a question. But the most complete game we’ve had in a while.
What didn’t you like about the kicking game?
 

Huskers123456

Redshirt
Feb 5, 2023
6,195
0
0
Being really good at something is important. Our run defense is our identity on D. Looks like our passing game is going to be our identity on O.

Fidone was put in a bad spot IMO. He need to catch passes up the field, not those quick hitters where he needs to make people miss. Need to hit him in stride or sitting down in the middle of the field.

Kind of got lost in the action but Barney looks to be as explosive and athletic as advertised

Wide receivers physically look like they play for Bama or Georgia.

Line opening up holes inside is so refreshing.
 

Laner2

Senior
Dec 27, 2007
18,967
900
113
Fidone is concerning, there were several runs that could have went for big yards if he blocked the perimeter better. He also looked slow and couldn’t produce yards after catch. TE now seems to be the biggest question mark on offense.
Ya, TE underwhelmed me. Have to wonder how much of that part of the game they're keeping under wraps for sCUm. Considering much of the game was pretty vanilla I thought the execution was serviceable, nothing better than that. Overall pleased with what I saw and more impressed with DR and HH.
 

iROOT4nu

All-Conference
Jul 10, 2009
13,677
1,318
0
DR looked like he’s able to handle pressure and make plays, or throw it away if needed.

Lots of maturity showed for a true freshman.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,507
20,870
113
What didn’t you like about the kicking game?

I didn’t get to watch too closely but kicking off short and once OB seemed less than ideal. But Boom did get ahold of a punt, which was encouraging.
 

VictoryRed

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2004
20,246
3,126
113
So I’m in Chicago, headed to a concert and didn’t get to watch the game as close as I would have liked. But did see it. What were your observations?

To me it was mostly good stuff. Only real issues I noticed were Hartzog got picked on a little and Fidone seemed to struggle both blocking and passing. Also kicking game is still probably a question. But the most complete game we’ve had in a while.
It was the first game with a Frosh QB, on a team that could barely move the ball last year. There is no nitpicking , we won in convincing fashion. We won the turnover battle and didn't have many penalties. Enoy it .
 

SickOfPractice

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2021
2,997
1
0
*Obviously DR is a huge difference maker. Hell, by the 2nd Qtr I wasn't worried about 3rd & long, I already had confidence in him picking it up.

*I loved seeing HH get so much game time. I think we'll need QB #2 in a game or two this year.

*I loved seeing so many players get in the game fairly early. This is great for their development & the overall morale of the locker room.

I haven't felt this good or optimistic after an opening game in a long time.
 
Dec 4, 2007
2,397
313
0
DR looked like he’s able to handle pressure and make plays, or throw it away if needed.

Lots of maturity showed for a true freshman.
On Irvin's long run, Rhule said it was a third check down by DR. The first was to a pass, then checked to run, then checked into the final run
 

Shoxsker

Sophomore
Feb 10, 2014
1,670
170
58
Fidone is concerning, there were several runs that could have went for big yards if he blocked the perimeter better. He also looked slow and couldn’t produce yards after catch. TE now seems to be the biggest question mark on offense.
As a unit, not really a question mark. The one individual, yes Fidone doesn't look like our Best TE, not even top 3. The rest played well a d we add a stud blocker too.
 

planored

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2003
14,113
2,168
0
My take on Fidone, he wasn’t used properly is passing, he needs to down the middle of field, no more stretch passes to a TE. I liked we only had 3 penalties. Don’t believe any on the D, could be wrong. D responded after our fumble.
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,838
2,157
113
My take on Fidone, he wasn’t used properly is passing, he needs to down the middle of field, no more stretch passes to a TE. I liked we only had 3 penalties. Don’t believe any on the D, could be wrong. D responded after our fumble.
a big guy like that ain't gonna speed around a corner putting a move on someone..I agree he needs to be catching passes north and south, where just his momentum after contact gets 5 more yards
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
I wasn't able to watch the game, but listened to the stream. Didn't sound impressive, but I just saw two highlights on YouTube, on both Raiola and the Defense, and I was really surprised by just how good they looked. As said, it was Utep, and we'll learn more next week, but I have to say this. They played good football, they looked good, really good. Not looking at all like they have in the recent past; bungling things. They seemed very well conditioned, confident, well coached, and the skill players had, well, real skill. Good sign, good direction, good game!
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
*Obviously DR is a huge difference maker. Hell, by the 2nd Qtr I wasn't worried about 3rd & long, I already had confidence in him picking it up.

*I loved seeing HH get so much game time. I think we'll need QB #2 in a game or two this year.

*I loved seeing so many players get in the game fairly early. This is great for their development & the overall morale of the locker room.

I haven't felt this good or optimistic after an opening game in a long time.
Well said, all correct, it has NOT been this way in quite a while. You are right about DR systematically making 3rd downs, this is something really not seen here in a long time. I can't remember when the subs took over a game or the game was in hand early on, seems forever. Next week will reveal much more.
 

Laner2

Senior
Dec 27, 2007
18,967
900
113
Gotta say, even with a small sample set Carter Nelson looked good. No deer in the headlights that I could see.
 

thall_

Senior
Sep 25, 2022
2,725
469
0
Pros:
  • DR is a stud, total gamechanger
  • defense is still fast, swarming to the ball
  • new WRs looked good when they caught the ball
Cons:
  • Probably the most concerning for the upcoming game is that the defense was still giving up chunk plays and letting opposing WRs separate a ton
  • Either Fidone is terrible or his coaching is
  • A bad drop made this look like a game wayyyy longer than it should’ve. A good team will punish us for not seizing those opportunities
 

GeorgeFlippin

Heisman
May 29, 2001
38,549
35,531
113
No doubt work to do to get better, but it's a good start to the season. The hype will be on for next weeks game, hope everyone on the team will be super focused for the practices ahead. It will be a tough game coming up, should be fun!
 

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
The defense is deep. Especially the d-line. When is the last time we could say we were deep on the d-line? It’s refreshing to see the future out there instead of having to scramble and try make guys Cam Meredith a DT.

Bullock was a starter at WR last year. He’s now the 8th guy? Talk about flipping a room.

Relatively clean game. Few penalties. Won the turn over battle. Gave up 1 drive, otherwise dominated on defense.

Fun game.
 

SnohomishRed

All-Conference
Jan 31, 2005
8,642
1,937
0
Although hard to make assumptions on one game against a weak opponent. I will say this Raiola is the best Qb we have had in 2 decades. This team is a lock for a bowl game if he stays healthy
 

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
Although hard to make assumptions on one game against a weak opponent. I will say this Raiola is the best Qb we have had in 2 decades. This team is a lock for a bowl game if he stays healthy
He didn’t force anything. Threw the ball away when he should have and made some great throws. He climbed the pocket!!!! Stuff we haven’t seen in forever.
 

RBigredMax

Redshirt
Mar 23, 2023
4,700
2
0
He didn’t force anything. Threw the ball away when he should have and made some great throws. He climbed the pocket!!!! Stuff we haven’t seen in forever.
There were two passes he threw that were somewhat dangerous. But the TD throws were money and on point and going through progressions was awesome. Also didn’t panic on the 2nd and 30 - gotta a chunk and then another. Smart football for the most part. Wasn’t flawless - but man considering his age, I’m impressed and it’s what I was hoping for.
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
Lots of positives here. As it all sinks in, again Utep, but regardless, what stood out to me was something SO missing for so long. Simple fundamentals, and execution. DR could deliver, but WRs could catch, and runners mostly hit the holes the OL was making. LOS was owned and will imposed. Huskers did not look weak, confused or without confidence. They played hard, well and thorough. Next week it will be different, but seems we have what it takes to make it a game. Not seen that in a while either.
 

cubsker_rivals142943

All-Conference
May 29, 2003
18,603
3,797
0
RBs were really impressive. Ran harder than I've seen in years.

Neyor and Banks give us the most legitimate starting WRs we've had in awhile.

Hard to say what our pass rush is. Utep offense was gimmicky nonsense. We'll find out in a week.
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,188
4,837
91
NU has 2 receivers that are 1A and 1B in addition to other good ones, and have four backs that can produce. Plus a QB that can take full advantage of this talent.
 

Husker.Wed._rivals

All-Conference
Feb 13, 2004
17,648
3,699
98
Lots of positives here. As it all sinks in, again Utep, but regardless, what stood out to me was something SO missing for so long. Simple fundamentals, and execution. DR could deliver, but WRs could catch, and runners mostly hit the holes the OL was making. LOS was owned and will imposed. Huskers did not look weak, confused or without confidence. They played hard, well and thorough. Next week it will be different, but seems we have what it takes to make it a game. Not seen that in a while either.
Good post. Except...why does next week have to be different? Everything that worked today can work Saturday if Satterfield doesn't wet his pants when our run game gets stuffed for "only" a two-yard gain.
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
Good post. Except...why does next week have to be different? Everything that worked today can work Saturday if Satterfield doesn't wet his pants when our run game gets stuffed for "only" a two-yard gain.
Will be different because while we are finally playing up to our potential and capability, CU is pretty loaded and has the talent to give us game. So, will things be different is will we play a good game and not flub up under the lights.
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
Again, I watched only highlights, but clearly saw DR going through progressions, then of course delivering on time and on target. Don't think I've seen that since Zac Taylor.
 

the vulcan

Sophomore
Jun 10, 2004
7,148
101
0
It's said best improvement comes between first & second week. Same true for CU. Needs to be a GOOD game!
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,801
78
It was the first game with a Frosh QB, on a team that could barely move the ball last year. There is no nitpicking , we won in convincing fashion. We won the turnover battle and didn't have many penalties. Enoy it .
Of course this was against a team with a new coaching staff and 12 FCS transfers…. CU will be a better test but we should handle them too.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,801
78
Coaches trying to ISO Fidone in the flat was a huge fail. He needs to be delay drag over the middle or just stay home and block.
WRs missed blocks according to Tommy Armstrong. Said those plays would have worked had the WRs done their jobs.