OT: Peter Kiss

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,374
6,308
113
Not sure what the OP is talking about re “whipping boy”

while most agreed he probably wasn’t Big10 caliber, many actually questioned the degree to which he was put in the doghouse AND he received basically unanimous recognition for being a good/ supportive teammate on the bench.

thus i suspect what you’ll see here is post after post expressing comments similar to the one above - good for him

I see no reason why a Rutgers fan wouldn’t wish him well

“whipping boy” ...don’t even know what you’re talking about
 

AshCatchEm

Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
13,884
19,925
113
Your favorite whipping boy from last year is playing great at Bryant. Averaging 17 points, 6 rebounds , 4 assists and shooting 41% from 3. Happy he found the correct level to play at for his 5th year.
We wanted him to transfer and he has had more success doing so than he would have here. That doesn't make him anyone's whipping boy. Just makes us informed. It was obviously the right sentiment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virginiarufan

toby83

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2014
4,095
3,822
0
Peter Kiss, Bryant- A true Player of the Year candidate, the Rutgers-transfer has been everything Bulldogs fans had hoped for. The 6'5" senior is averaging 17.7p/5.5r/3.3a, and has a ridiculous 113.9 O-rating on 23.4% usage (the best O-Rating of any player in the league with a usage rate north of 22%). Kiss is perhaps the most well-rounded offensive player in the conference; He can get downhill and finish at the rim, he can knock down the three (42.5%), and he'll find the open guy.
 

ColonelRutgers

All-American
Dec 15, 2003
7,094
9,246
113
Not sure what the OP is talking about re “whipping boy”

while most agreed he probably wasn’t Big10 caliber, many actually questioned the degree to which he was put in the doghouse AND he received basically unanimous recognition for being a good/ supportive teammate on the bench.

thus i suspect what you’ll see here is post after post expressing comments similar to the one above - good for him

I see no reason why a Rutgers fan wouldn’t wish him well

“whipping boy” ...don’t even know what you’re talking about
Not sure where you get the “unanimous recognition for being a supportive / good teammate.” He appeared completely checked out and you never saw him in any postgame celebrations with his teammates all season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cm_13

NiTeKnight

Senior
Nov 28, 2003
738
768
93
Peter Kiss, Bryant- A true Player of the Year candidate, the Rutgers-transfer has been everything Bulldogs fans had hoped for. The 6'5" senior is averaging 17.7p/5.5r/3.3a, and has a ridiculous 113.9 O-rating on 23.4% usage (the best O-Rating of any player in the league with a usage rate north of 22%). Kiss is perhaps the most well-rounded offensive player in the conference; He can get downhill and finish at the rim, he can knock down the three (42.5%), and he'll find the open guy.
Happy he is doing well!
 

RU677381

Senior
Apr 21, 2010
382
625
45
Maybe this is just an example of pikiell misjedging a player’s potential a la the guard he brought in who started for a year
And never scored.
 

rufeelinit

All-Conference
May 16, 2010
12,647
4,351
0
Not a stretch for me to envision situations where he could have helped us this year. Was athletic and flashed some offensive skills. He certainly did not strike me as lacking confidence either. However it was clear that for whatever reason he was not going to play after a certain point last year so happy he found a home and is doing well.
 

AshCatchEm

Heisman
Jan 8, 2016
13,884
19,925
113
Not a stretch for me to envision situations where he could have helped us this year. Was athletic and flashed some offensive skills. He certainly did not strike me as lacking confidence either. However it was clear that for whatever reason he was not going to play after a certain point last year so happy he found a home and is doing well.
It's a big stretch
 
  • Like
Reactions: cm_13

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
Happy for the kid. It’s obviously lesser competition but have him the chance to shine like a couple of recent football players. If he stayed he would be fighting for minutes though he may have found a role with his 3 point shooting.

The issue we have is too many guards who can score. We lack that bigger rebounding guy who bangs and sacrifices alongside the Center. RHJ is rebounding well but all of that inside pounding wears on you and he’s logging many minutes down there. Mulcahey picks up that spot when RHJ is sitting. Very unselfish team players.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Not sure what the OP is talking about re “whipping boy”

while most agreed he probably wasn’t Big10 caliber, many actually questioned the degree to which he was put in the doghouse AND he received basically unanimous recognition for being a good/ supportive teammate on the bench.

thus i suspect what you’ll see here is post after post expressing comments similar to the one above - good for him

I see no reason why a Rutgers fan wouldn’t wish him well

“whipping boy” ...don’t even know what you’re talking about
The kid never bad mouthed anyone from Rutgers in the press so Kiss was a good player but not a player whom was making a difference. Wish him only the best in his possibly final season at Bryant.
 

RUBigFrank

All-Conference
Jun 9, 2003
2,841
1,755
113
Kiss could have been very functional here - a Montez drive in to the lane and a kick out to the perimeter for an open three.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,193
12,454
113
Happy for the kid. It’s obviously lesser competition but have him the chance to shine like a couple of recent football players. If he stayed he would be fighting for minutes though he may have found a role with his 3 point shooting.

The issue we have is too many guards who can score. We lack that bigger rebounding guy who bangs and sacrifices alongside the Center. RHJ is rebounding well but all of that inside pounding wears on you and he’s logging many minutes down there. Mulcahey picks up that spot when RHJ is sitting. Very unselfish team players.
The issue we have is too many guards that aren't consistent scorers.
 

REDRICH65

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2010
2,773
2,186
113
Good for Peter. Can’t play forever. One great season provides memories that last forever. On the other hand, some people mature later than others. Maybe h could have been the 3pt guy we’ve missed this year. Rather him than Palmquist
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
All we heard from the “ experts” was Palmquist was a great 3 PT shooter. Who knows maybe next season or?
 

NickKnight 1

All-Conference
Mar 22, 2003
8,778
2,052
0
Kiss could have been very functional here - a Montez drive in to the lane and a kick out to the perimeter for an open three.
I agree, but we have a coach
that takes defense as the team's first priority. Personally I would like the true shooter available comming off the bench.
 

RedChucken123

Senior
Oct 21, 2015
487
565
88
I think Kiss definitely could have been a role player here. We just cornered him into being a 3-point specialist though. If he saw more shots fall from drives and mid-range, maybe the threes would’ve followed. Same thing goes for Palmquist. Though he’s recruited as our “3-pointer guy” maybe he shouldn’t limit himself to shooting threes starting out.
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,405
28,548
113
Kiss got cooked on defense all the time couldn’t get on the floor because of it
 

Russ Wood

Heisman
Oct 12, 2011
94,313
45,143
0
Peter Kiss went for 33 in Bryant’s win over Sacred Heart today. Averaging 22.7 PPG in his last three games. He’s having one hell of a year. Another guy I wish we still had.
YAAAASSSS



Ya know, I was just thinking that it would be awesome if a RU fan started another Peter Kiss thread before 2021 was over.

Rutgers fans never let me down and I love that.