Not to mention, the DNC is basically racially profiling and discriminating against people and denying Constitutionally protected freedoms because they are practicing their faith.
huh? I respect rog for having an open mind, reviewing the situation and coming to a conclusion and changing a position based on an honest evaluation. Don't agree but can understand and respect it. This comment you made is ridiculous. The policy has nothing to do with the DNC. The no fly list is not made up solely of one race or religion or type of people other than a type that has something in their background that might make them suspicious. You've made a lot of good points with posts lately; this is not one of them.
What religion are the individuals who are predominantly on that list do you think?
You took a quote from a journalist that is accurate and put your own spin on it and deemed your spin as fact. That is the problem. You made something up that isn't fully factual. It is an agenda driven drivel that is what is making this country worse.
I think we can both agree that this is true of all political parties,different ideologies,media perspective as well as religions.
Way to not answer any of my questions. And what is my spin? You said it had nothing to do with the DNC, I showed you where the DNC lawmakers were calling for the vote.
I don't need to answer your questions as I am responding to your initial post of attempting to pass on a half truth as fact and the questions are not relevant to my point. I'm not interested in that discussion you are now trying to save face on my criticism.
BWHAHAHAHAA, saving face, the whole premise of your post (The DNC has nothing to do with this) went up in flames with my posting of the tweet. I'm sorry if you don't like the fact that you are supporting racism and moreover, it's at the expense of the Constitutionally protected freedoms. Trump talked about being a racist, you guys are trying to enact legislation proving it.
You have such an issue in understanding words and sentences for what they are. By the time words go into your ears, they get twisted to something they are not by the time it gets to whatever is in that noggin. I guess that is who you are are.
You are simply too dumb to have an adult conversation. If you read his post, I am calling him out for accusing the DNC for racially profiling and discriminating without regard to the truth of the matter. Then you two are both twisting words into something that isn't on point. The point being made is the DNC is not racially profiling or discriminating based on religion. The questions posed do not address that false point but they do lead to a more honest discussion on my point that not all being put on the list are dark skin or muslim. Now go back to your ignorant hole eating ****.
I guess when it's the DNC pushing legislation, all you have to do to deny the realities of what the legislation is and to just state as fact that it isn't regardless of reality. Interesting. As I pointed out, you are literally kidding yourself if you don't think the majority of individuals on that list are and will be Muslim. You are further kidding yourself if you think their Constitutionally protected freedoms are not being violated (2nd and the 4th, for exercising their 1st). So, spin it however you want to delude yourself into believing this is something other than what it is. As I have said all along, my issue with this has absolutely nothing to do with 2nd amendment. This scares the hell out of me for how it violates the 4th.
I understand this sentiment. Still has nothing to do with your initial claim but I'm done with attempting to beat you over the head on that.