New updates Big Ten schedule
- Thread starter nosok23
- Start date
We went from easiest schedule I've seen in years to adding @ Ohio St and @ USC who weren't even the two new teams added after the second release of schedules. Doesn't make sense but new world, new league.
absolutely brutal scheduling. Big ten is murders row moving forward. We better pony up on the NIL
These can’t be right….I’ve been told we would have to play OSU, MI, Ore, USC, Penn St every year and there would be no way to win 3 games in conference.
We do, but they ran and hid in the 90s because we were kicking the living **** out of them at the time.
I say “see ya” to OU, Cincinnati, Arizona, Okie Lite; and Tennessee on future schedules. Some of them may even be glad to drop NU, too.
Gotta schedule 3 wins in the OOC until such time we feel like we can bank on 5 or 6 league wins a year.
Gotta schedule 3 wins in the OOC until such time we feel like we can bank on 5 or 6 league wins a year.
For sure need to dump OU and Tennessee but don’t worry as much about Big 12 opponents
25 ain't bad either. Michigan, tOSU, Oregon, and Washington. Are the teams to be scared of. If Nebraska can develop some true physicality then USC and UCLA are not unstoppable juggernauts. We will also see with tOSU not sold on them either. But Michigan, Oregon, and Washington look like auto losses.
I'm ok with this schedule. I think it's realistic and fair. Just hope we get USC and UCLA in November!!
Why do we get mad playing good teams LOL? Are you saying we’re inferior
. Are you part of Bidenomics lolWe do suck so any help is a plus at this point.Why do we get mad playing good teams LOL? Are you saying we’re inferior
I dont get the people who are shaking in their boots at these schedules. This looks awesome. Cant automatically assume all these teams continue to roll and NU wont.
I think the BIG was quite kind to us
while you can never predict future results - I consider 6 teams at present to be the conf "heavies"
OSU-Mich-PSU-USC-O-Wash
the number of those teams we play over the next 5 years --- 2-3-2-3-3 total = 13
UCLA = 18
Oregon = 17
MSU = 17
Wash = 16
Michigan = 16
Maryl = 16
Wisc = 15
OSU = 15
Indiana = 15
NW = 15
Rutg = 15
PSU = 14
USC = 14
Purdue = 14
Illinois = 14
Iowa = 13
Minn = 13
Nebr = 13
Michigan-OSU-PSU-Oregon-Wash-USC play a much, much higher percentage of their games against the upper level conf teams than we do -
while you can never predict future results - I consider 6 teams at present to be the conf "heavies"
OSU-Mich-PSU-USC-O-Wash
the number of those teams we play over the next 5 years --- 2-3-2-3-3 total = 13
UCLA = 18
Oregon = 17
MSU = 17
Wash = 16
Michigan = 16
Maryl = 16
Wisc = 15
OSU = 15
Indiana = 15
NW = 15
Rutg = 15
PSU = 14
USC = 14
Purdue = 14
Illinois = 14
Iowa = 13
Minn = 13
Nebr = 13
Michigan-OSU-PSU-Oregon-Wash-USC play a much, much higher percentage of their games against the upper level conf teams than we do -
Last edited:
It is idiocy to have an 18 team football conference with no divisions. You are going to have standings when each team has only played half of the conference???? We shouldn’t spend much time looking at schedules beyond next year—very likely to be more changes coming.