Monmouth beats ND

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,448
16,281
113
And they are very well coached. There are good young coaches like King Rice out there.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,276
176,939
113
Monmouth will beat RU and probably have a home court advantage when we play them in two weeks
 

shields

Heisman
Aug 5, 2002
79,811
17,716
113
BAC, how do you know even who is playing in two weeks? What if they have an injury?
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,405
16,247
113
And they are very well coached. There are good young coaches like King Rice out there.
I'm sure you would be saying that if he was the RU MBB HC and did the same at Rutgers as he did at Monmouth.
1st year : 12-20
2nd : 10-21
3rd : 11-21
4th: 18-15
This is his fifth year and with the ND win has Monmouth with a 3-1 record early in season( only loss was to USC)

You're right King Rice is a good coach and I'm glad the Hawks fans gave him
time to build a good program without claiming he couldn't coach while he was building a program, but not winning games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AD888 and mikefla

RU-Choppin-Ohio

Heisman
Jul 31, 2011
32,978
37,755
113
I'm sure you would be saying that if he was the RU MBB HC and did the same at Rutgers as he did at Monmouth.
1st year : 12-20
2nd : 10-21
3rd : 11-21
4th: 18-15
This is his fifth year and with the ND win has Monmouth with a 3-1 record early in season( only loss was to USC)

You're right King Rice is a good coach and I'm glad the Hawks fans gave him
time to build a good program without claiming he couldn't coach while he was building a program, but not winning games.

if he was the Rutgers coach people would have calling for his head after year 3 as a horrible coach.
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
You're right King Rice is a good coach and I'm glad the Hawks fans gave him
time to build a good program without claiming he couldn't coach while he was building a program, but not winning games.

no there is a difference. Because when we played them a couple of years ago.down there (and I sat mid court row 5) even because they lost they still out played us. So as many have said OVER AND OVER AND OVER again....it is not always about the W and L's, but HOW you play the game.

Eddie could lose every damn ageme for all I care, as long as we have a team that plays basketball with some IQ, effort, and commitment to the basics of the game.
 

TDIrish27

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2001
4,438
2,666
0
Hats off to the Hawks---2 wins away from home vs UCLA and ND .

Said it a month ago-------they go 10 deep and play fast.

When the Saar kid shakes off the rust of missing preseason they'll be even better
 

Mr_Twister

All-American
Apr 1, 2004
15,684
5,819
0

mikefla

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2012
6,450
1,552
0
I watched the RU Clemson game. We actually beat them last year. This year it was a near blowout at times.

Clemson hustled.....threw up off balance shots that WENT in and if there was a loose ball THEY got it.(they also had a decent fan contingent for an away game)

Our guys didnt hustle very often.....seemed unconcerned...and had ZERO sense of urgency. We looked decent in the 1st half.......what changed?

I am a tad disappointed......I keep wondering why RU players..(even decent players like Kadeem Jack)always seem to end up moody.....with deflated confidence, comraderie and production.
 

derleider

All-Conference
Jan 3, 2003
61,232
1,449
0
I watched the RU Clemson game. We actually beat them last year. This year it was a near blowout at times.

Clemson hustled.....threw up off balance shots that WENT in and if there was a loose ball THEY got it.(they also had a decent fan contingent for an away game)

Our guys didnt hustle very often.....seemed unconcerned...and had ZERO sense of urgency. We looked decent in the 1st half.......what changed?

I am a tad disappointed......I keep wondering why RU players..(even decent players like Kadeem Jack)always seem to end up moody.....with deflated confidence, comraderie and production.
We arent good. Thats pretty simple to figure out. Any other questions.
 

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,325
15,159
113
It certainly hasn't happened overnight for King Rice...

Season Team Overall Conference Standing
Monmouth Hawks
(Northeast Conference) (2011–2013)
2011–12 Monmouth 12–20 10–8 T–5th
2012–13 Monmouth 10–21 5–13 T–10th
Monmouth Hawks (Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference) (2013–present)
2013–14 Monmouth 11–21 5–15 9th
2014–15 Monmouth 18–15 13–7 T–3rd
2015–16 Monmouth 3–1
Monmouth: 54–78 (.409) 33–43 (.434)
Total: 54–78 (.409)


Like Rice, year four (2016-17) is the season in which Jordan's team must show some serious improvement.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,405
16,247
113
"Like Rice, year four (2016-17) is the season in which Jordan's team must show some serious improvement."
Agree with that statement, but can understand why some lost confidence in RU MBB ever being a successful program and expect to see major improvement "yesterday" before they start to hope RU MBB will be successful.
It has been a long long time since RU MBB made the NCAA and some RU fans look back on a HC with a 79-75 record with fondness, even if he had losing seasons every other year and never made the Big Dance.
I understand trusting Jordan the way his team looks, now, is hard to do for many RU fans after the program has let them down for so many years.
But I tend to look for light when others only expect darkness and eventually that light will shine through .
I believe Jordan needs this season to set the stage for the progress that will begin to show next season.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,193
12,454
113
It took a Myles Mack jump shot at the buzzer to defeat Monmouth on the road.They out played Rutgers for most of the game.Its hard to believe based on what has happened so far this season that Rutgers will win this matchup because Monmouth has played and defeated quality opponents on the road.