message to tjebud from the rest of America......."shut up and leave"
mao said your insurance premiums wouldn't go up....true or falseTrump said windmills caused cancer, is that true or false?
Trump said windmills caused cancer, is that true or false?
We discussed this. It is currently being studied, results aren't in yet. Real researchers are actually looking into it. It may be proven false, but it is being looked at. It is a thing.
It's funny how your tribe takes things out of context when talking about the right, yet, you defend climate change studies that have been debunked but yet the myth continues.
better tell that to tjebud the cut and paste queenWe will start taking your opinion on these topics seriously when you can show that you can tell the difference between scientific research and a blog post.
We will start taking your opinion on these topics seriously when you can show that you can tell the difference between scientific research and a blog post.
PLEASE stop with the facts....you know it sends the sheeples into a frenzy...and it's been such a nice weekend....even in Keene Vermont[roll][banana][roll]At least I have a chance of being taken seriously...
There are at least 50 more articles about this... The 1st two are gov. overviews. It's real, the direct impact is still under debate.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653647/
http://www.simcoemuskokahealth.org/...opic-environment/health_impacts_wind_turbines
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/06/wind-turbine-syndrome/530694/
https://principia-scientific.org/wind-turbines-can-cause-heart-damage-warns-german-professor/
http://www.windvigilance.com/about-...-frequency-noise-infrasound-and-wind-turbines
https://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/2013/5-million-lawsuit-over-wind-turbine-syndrome-oregon/
https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/wind-turbines-health1.htm
At least I have a chance of being taken seriously...
There are at least 50 more articles about this... The 1st two are gov. overviews. It's real, the direct impact is still under debate.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653647/
http://www.simcoemuskokahealth.org/...opic-environment/health_impacts_wind_turbines
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/06/wind-turbine-syndrome/530694/
https://principia-scientific.org/wind-turbines-can-cause-heart-damage-warns-german-professor/
http://www.windvigilance.com/about-...-frequency-noise-infrasound-and-wind-turbines
https://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/2013/5-million-lawsuit-over-wind-turbine-syndrome-oregon/
https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/wind-turbines-health1.htm
PLEASE stop with the facts....you know it sends the sheeples into a frenzy...and it's been such a nice weekend....even in Keene Vermont[roll][banana][roll]
You didn’t even read the articles you posted. That’s just being lazy. Her’s a good summary statement from the last article that covers most of what you posted.
“So the hope is that new buffer-zone regulations and sound-canceling technologies can do away with the question: Do wind turbines cause health problems? Because most of the science out there says they don't.”
Trump says crazy **** and his minions flock to try to make it true.
I thought scientific research was considered sorcery to this crowd.
Merlin approves of this post
How does it make you feel as an American to see a member of the Danish Parliament mocking the President of the United States?
How do you explain that you did not read my intro? "still under debate" covers the last article. Just like everything else, you see what you want to see.
There are at least 50 more articles about this... The 1st two are gov. overviews. It's real, the direct impact is still under debate.
Stop eating bacon everyone! May cause cancer! Research still debating.
Stop eating bacon everyone! May cause cancer! Research still debating.
Perfect example. They have studied it and they continue to study it. Glad to see that you now understand my argument.
So as of today, Bacon and windmills DO NOT cause cancer , correct??
Not to my knowledge, but I am not a researcher. My contention is that making fun of Trump for making a comment about wind mills is not crazy talk...the actual quote was the following:
"And they say the noise causes cancer. You tell me that one (makes whirring noise mimicking a turbine).”
Factually true, windmills produce EMF's. EMF's have been studied to see if they cause cancer...therefore "and they say" is factually correct.
It gets back to why you have to push a false narrative if he is such an idiot. You would think that you could use real, non-refutable quotes on a daily basis, but instead you keep using stuff like this. Why?
As of today , windmills do not cause cancer. SO , Trumps quote is untrue, windmills do not cause cancer. If he said and they say "windmills are being studied to see if they cause cancer" that would be accurate. But you continue to defend him if It makes you feel good.
Here we go again. Does your tribe ever try to be accurate?
Looking forward to your coming defense of using nuclear weapons to stop hurricanes.
Go on, lie to yourself.