Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals" data-source="post: 131693653" data-attributes="member: 1759980"><p>LYING ABOUT ME AGAIN, I SEE. I SAID AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT DOC SPEARS WAS THE BEST BECAUSE HE IS THE ONLY ONE TO GO UNDEFEATED IN REGULAR AND POST-SEASON AND LOST 2 GAMES IN 3 SEASONS AND HAS THE BEST WINNING PERCENTAGE -- 80.8% -- AMONG THE COACHES WHO HAVE BEEN AROUND AS WVU COACH MORE THAN 10 MINUTES, AND YOU KNOW IT. AS YOU WELL KNOW, TROUT LOST ONCE, AND ONLY COACHED ONE SEASON SO HIS WINNING PERCENTAGE IS HARDLY THE SAME AS DOC, DON, RICH, BOBBY AND JIM AND PAPPY. FOUR WVU COACHES LOST ONLY ONE GAME -- FREDERICK LINCOLN EMERY, WHO WENT 0-1 IN 1891, WVU'S FIRST EVER VARSITY FOOTBALL GAME; HARRY McCRORY 5-1 IN 1895, HARRY ANDERSON 6-1 IN 1897 AND TROUT. NEHLEN WON THE MOST GAMES, IN PART, BECAUSE HE COACHED THE LONGEST, FOR 21 SEASONS. AFTER NEHLEN AND BEFORE NEAL BROWN, WVU WENT 149-79, WHICH IS 65.3%. THIS WOULD BE A FAIR BENCHMARK TO EVALUATE NEAL BROWN BY. HE'S 11-11 AT 50% SO FAR BUT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO EVALUATE TILL AT LEAST 4 OR 5 SEASONS. IF HE'S BELOW 65%, NOT SO GOOD. IF HE'S ABOVE 65%, THEN GOOD AND FANS SHOULDN'T CRITICIZE HIM IF HE IS 8-4 AGAIN AND AGAIN, WHICH IS 67%. FAIR ENOUGH? OR DO YOU WANT TO QUIBBLE AND MAKE YOURSELF LOOK PETTY AGAIN?&nbsp; IF NEAL BROWN WINS 80.9% AT WVU YOU AND I BOTH WILL BE HAVING ORGASMS.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals, post: 131693653, member: 1759980"] LYING ABOUT ME AGAIN, I SEE. I SAID AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT DOC SPEARS WAS THE BEST BECAUSE HE IS THE ONLY ONE TO GO UNDEFEATED IN REGULAR AND POST-SEASON AND LOST 2 GAMES IN 3 SEASONS AND HAS THE BEST WINNING PERCENTAGE -- 80.8% -- AMONG THE COACHES WHO HAVE BEEN AROUND AS WVU COACH MORE THAN 10 MINUTES, AND YOU KNOW IT. AS YOU WELL KNOW, TROUT LOST ONCE, AND ONLY COACHED ONE SEASON SO HIS WINNING PERCENTAGE IS HARDLY THE SAME AS DOC, DON, RICH, BOBBY AND JIM AND PAPPY. FOUR WVU COACHES LOST ONLY ONE GAME -- FREDERICK LINCOLN EMERY, WHO WENT 0-1 IN 1891, WVU'S FIRST EVER VARSITY FOOTBALL GAME; HARRY McCRORY 5-1 IN 1895, HARRY ANDERSON 6-1 IN 1897 AND TROUT. NEHLEN WON THE MOST GAMES, IN PART, BECAUSE HE COACHED THE LONGEST, FOR 21 SEASONS. AFTER NEHLEN AND BEFORE NEAL BROWN, WVU WENT 149-79, WHICH IS 65.3%. THIS WOULD BE A FAIR BENCHMARK TO EVALUATE NEAL BROWN BY. HE'S 11-11 AT 50% SO FAR BUT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO EVALUATE TILL AT LEAST 4 OR 5 SEASONS. IF HE'S BELOW 65%, NOT SO GOOD. IF HE'S ABOVE 65%, THEN GOOD AND FANS SHOULDN'T CRITICIZE HIM IF HE IS 8-4 AGAIN AND AGAIN, WHICH IS 67%. FAIR ENOUGH? OR DO YOU WANT TO QUIBBLE AND MAKE YOURSELF LOOK PETTY AGAIN? IF NEAL BROWN WINS 80.9% AT WVU YOU AND I BOTH WILL BE HAVING ORGASMS. [/QUOTE]

Name

College Football Bowl Projections Week 5: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions

15 thoughts after Week 4: Heat on Lincoln Riley, Bryce Underwood's ROI & more

On3 Heisman Trophy Poll: Top 10 player rankings after Week 4

North Dakota State debuts hidden-mountain uniforms for first Mountain West home game

SEC, South Carolina announce joint one-game suspension of Dylan Stewart

Reply to thread

Latest