Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
True Freshman AA Team
High School Football Rankings
AP Poll
CFB Player Rankings
Team Recruiting Rankings
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
SEC will enforce rules around professional athletes returning to college sports
Preseason 2026 True Freshman All-America football team
Tracking college football’s highest-paid quarterbacks ahead of 2026 season
Intel: Texas A&M pacing for an elite 2028 haul and the Aggies will host a wave of elite visitors this season
Crain & Cone make team-by-team Big Ten football record predictions for 2026 season
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
League Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mountaineer Steve" data-source="post: 129529330" data-attributes="member: 1495432"><p>This guy is brilliant or has been reading all of my posts :smiley:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Boren is an egomaniac blowhard that is causing disstabilization in the league.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Now that Dodds is gone at TexA$$, Boren has to show his A$$ in public forum. This might be the best quote from the story. <span style="color: #ff0000">Other leagues do their fighting behind closed doors, because they don’t have a 74-year-old president at a legacy university drunk on his own power, without understanding or care for the collective good, and intent on being remembered as an agent of change in athletics — whether the change is ultimately good or bad.</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Another gere is a great point - <span style="color: #ff0000">If the league is “psychologically disadvantaged,” as Boren famously said, it’s because he’s aired the same problems and uncertainties that exist in every league as something unique to the Big 12</span>.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Outside of myself, this is the first time I seen anyone point out that, <span style="color: #ff0000">The focus is typically on how far the Big 12 is behind the SEC and Big Ten in revenue distribution, which ignores the</span><strong><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)"> Big 12’s lead on the Pac-12 and ACC. </span></strong><span style="color: #000000">This lead is not going away anytime soon</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Surprisingly however he did get this wrong, <span style="color: #ff0000">The league would not be able to renegotiate existing TV contracts through expansion, meaning the difference would have to be made up for by some combination of creating a championship football game or a conference TV networ</span>k. As we all know now, adding 2 teams will give BIG12 prorata share increase. I believe adding 4 teams allows a look in into TV contracts. However and too his point unless the ACC implodes and the BIG12 ends up with a FSU/Clemson pair, TV contracts won't go up Prorata for 14 teams. This diffence however might be made up with BIG12N. My issue with adding teams is split of other revenue sources such as CCG (if one is added) 10 vs 14 teams, CFP split 10 vs 14 teams, and NCAA BB revenue</li> </ul><p></p><p>Long term however I believe there will be 4 P5 conferences, with either ACC or BIG12 surviving. The first between the ACC and BIG12 to create a network will be the winner. </p><p></p><p>The BIG12 has a HUGE advantage in that:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They have a ton of content <span style="color: #ff0000">not </span>already owned by ESPN or FOX</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They can convert LHN to BIG12N that would save 10's of millions on startup cost. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Except in small cases the BIG12's current footprint does not overlay other P5 conferences.</li> </ul><p>On the other hand the ACC has the following issues</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">All content is already owned by ESPN. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It would cost ESPN millions to start a ACCN </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">With all the cord cutting and ESPN slashing 100's of millions from budget they are not going to pay more for something they already own. And this my friend is why the ACCN has not taken off, and is not likely to take off until current TV deal ends. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Current footprint overlaps the SEC and BIG. and again with cord cutting, I doubt ESPN wants to go back to the same CABLE companies and try to strong arm them into picking up another network, and I doubt the cable companies want to add more cost to their customers. It would be better and more cost effective for ESPN to let ACC die and allow the BIG, SEC, and BIG12 pick up the relevant programs. </li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mountaineer Steve, post: 129529330, member: 1495432"] This guy is brilliant or has been reading all of my posts :smiley: [LIST] [*]Boren is an egomaniac blowhard that is causing disstabilization in the league. [*]Now that Dodds is gone at TexA$$, Boren has to show his A$$ in public forum. This might be the best quote from the story. [COLOR=#ff0000]Other leagues do their fighting behind closed doors, because they don’t have a 74-year-old president at a legacy university drunk on his own power, without understanding or care for the collective good, and intent on being remembered as an agent of change in athletics — whether the change is ultimately good or bad.[/COLOR] [*]Another gere is a great point - [COLOR=#ff0000]If the league is “psychologically disadvantaged,” as Boren famously said, it’s because he’s aired the same problems and uncertainties that exist in every league as something unique to the Big 12[/COLOR]. [*]Outside of myself, this is the first time I seen anyone point out that, [COLOR=#ff0000]The focus is typically on how far the Big 12 is behind the SEC and Big Ten in revenue distribution, which ignores the[/COLOR][B][COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)] Big 12’s lead on the Pac-12 and ACC. [/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#000000]This lead is not going away anytime soon[/COLOR] [*]Surprisingly however he did get this wrong, [COLOR=#ff0000]The league would not be able to renegotiate existing TV contracts through expansion, meaning the difference would have to be made up for by some combination of creating a championship football game or a conference TV networ[/COLOR]k. As we all know now, adding 2 teams will give BIG12 prorata share increase. I believe adding 4 teams allows a look in into TV contracts. However and too his point unless the ACC implodes and the BIG12 ends up with a FSU/Clemson pair, TV contracts won't go up Prorata for 14 teams. This diffence however might be made up with BIG12N. My issue with adding teams is split of other revenue sources such as CCG (if one is added) 10 vs 14 teams, CFP split 10 vs 14 teams, and NCAA BB revenue [/LIST] Long term however I believe there will be 4 P5 conferences, with either ACC or BIG12 surviving. The first between the ACC and BIG12 to create a network will be the winner. The BIG12 has a HUGE advantage in that: [LIST] [*]They have a ton of content [COLOR=#ff0000]not [/COLOR]already owned by ESPN or FOX [*]They can convert LHN to BIG12N that would save 10's of millions on startup cost. [*]Except in small cases the BIG12's current footprint does not overlay other P5 conferences. [/LIST] On the other hand the ACC has the following issues [LIST] [*]All content is already owned by ESPN. [*]It would cost ESPN millions to start a ACCN [*]With all the cord cutting and ESPN slashing 100's of millions from budget they are not going to pay more for something they already own. And this my friend is why the ACCN has not taken off, and is not likely to take off until current TV deal ends. [*]Current footprint overlaps the SEC and BIG. and again with cord cutting, I doubt ESPN wants to go back to the same CABLE companies and try to strong arm them into picking up another network, and I doubt the cable companies want to add more cost to their customers. It would be better and more cost effective for ESPN to let ACC die and allow the BIG, SEC, and BIG12 pick up the relevant programs. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3
SEC will enforce rules around professional athletes returning to college sports
02
On3
Preseason 2026 True Freshman All-America football team
03
On3
Tracking college football’s highest-paid quarterbacks ahead of 2026 season
04
Rivals
Intel: Texas A&M pacing for an elite 2028 haul and the Aggies will host a wave of elite visitors this season
05
On3
Crain & Cone make team-by-team Big Ten football record predictions for 2026 season
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
League Expansion
Top
Bottom