Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HurdyGurdyEer" data-source="post: 129575401" data-attributes="member: 1746848">Was he &quot;demoted&quot; to law professor? Or was he already a professor of law at Baylor?There really is a difference.And speaking of eggs, who came first to Baylor? Art Briles or Kenneth Starr?The correct answer will tell you who got the head start on the way Baylor's football program was being managed.Ken Starr stepped up and did the right thing .... I think we all agree it should have happened sooner. But he did do something and frankly, none of us know the inner workings at Baylor. We only know that Starr eventually did the right thing.I mean .... think about it .... the alternative would have been to retain Briles and attempt to change the culture and move forward and make the best of things. Maybe Starr was attempting to do that all along and realized too late that he was failing and then called in the investigators. None of us really know. But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt since he is the one who got the ball rolling on the investigation.One day, I suspect, the whole story will come out. And if I were a betting man I would bet that Starr will be seen as a good man who stepped into the middle of a mess and only screwed up by trying to steer things in the right direction before he realized he would not be able to do so. I would bet on it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HurdyGurdyEer, post: 129575401, member: 1746848"] Was he "demoted" to law professor? Or was he already a professor of law at Baylor? There really is a difference. And speaking of eggs, who came first to Baylor? Art Briles or Kenneth Starr? The correct answer will tell you who got the head start on the way Baylor's football program was being managed. Ken Starr stepped up and did the right thing .... I think we all agree it should have happened sooner. But he did do something and frankly, none of us know the inner workings at Baylor. We only know that Starr eventually did the right thing. I mean .... think about it .... the alternative would have been to retain Briles and attempt to change the culture and move forward and make the best of things. Maybe Starr was attempting to do that all along and realized too late that he was failing and then called in the investigators. None of us really know. But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt since he is the one who got the ball rolling on the investigation. One day, I suspect, the whole story will come out. And if I were a betting man I would bet that Starr will be seen as a good man who stepped into the middle of a mess and only screwed up by trying to steer things in the right direction before he realized he would not be able to do so. I would bet on it. [/QUOTE]

Name

Dan Lanning and Mike Elko made huge coaching mistakes, can they dig out this season?

Could college football luck its way into a functional 24-team playoff after it did with 12?

JaMarcus Shephard has brought swagger back to Oregon State and now the real challenge begins

Nick Saban declares money the 'bottom line' for 24-team CFP, pitches 'compromise'

Five games that could impact ESPN College GameDay's Week 8 location

Reply to thread

Latest