We have now been relegated to second place in all time wins. We can thank The Clown and may he his worthless tail get out of town now. In 2015 fiasco, I knew, now we have proof! Sad as hell !!
Who caresWe have now been relegated to second place in all time wins. We can thank The Clown and may he his worthless tail get out of town now. In 2015 fiasco, I knew, now we have proof! Sad as hell !!
BS. What a stupid *** postCongrats. Most of you have wanted this to happen all year. Countless threads have been started about it. You got your wish on wins. Not winning percentage. UK still leads in that.
Truth hurtsBS. What a stupid *** post
The truth ain’t in you, trollTruth hurts
So what? Triple C still lost the record to them which never should have happenedKU is going to have 100+ games taken away from them this summer.
What are UK fans allowed to care about anymore?Who cares
Relax
Who cares
I get it's a nice thing to be able to say but they've played several more years than us and have 150 more losses. We have the best all time win percentage and that is a much more impressive stat that factors in the difference in number of total years played.
Congrats. Most of you have wanted this to happen all year. Countless threads have been started about it. You got your wish on wins. Not winning percentage. UK still leads in that.
UK fans.Who cares
I’ll take 50.KU is going to have 100+ games taken away from them this summer.
To many players and coaches worked hard to get that record for social media wuss bags to be getting on here and downplaying it. Hopefully this gets turned around and we get it back. If you don’t care, that’s fine. Real Kentucky fans that bleed blue care.Who cares
To be fair there were a lot of cal worshippers on here all year that said there was ZERO CHANCE this was going to happen. ZERO.Congrats. Most of you have wanted this to happen all year. Countless threads have been started about it. You got your wish on wins. Not winning percentage. UK still leads in that.
That excuse don’t hunt. We’ve played the same amount of games for a hundred years now.I get it's a nice thing to be able to say but they've played several more years than us and have 150 more losses. We have the best all time win percentage and that is a much more impressive stat that factors in the difference in number of total years played.
Wow. This is high level ignorance right here.Go get a tampon. Tubby a little, but mostly BCG is why they caught us. He's averaged 28 wins per season even after last season being factored. You take that garbage/covid class out and he's averaging nearly 30 per year. He has his faults and needs to get his head out of his *** but the fans who are treating the world like the sky is falling because now we're 2nd like anybody outside of Kanasas or Kentucky cares. Michigan is all the time winningest football team. You think Alabama gives a ****? Kansas will have their bad seasons in the future and we will catch up and trade with them. Have a drink and go to bed OP.
What are you smokin' bro.That excuse don’t hunt. We’ve played the same amount of games for a hundred years now.
| Rank | College | First Season | Seasons | Wins | Losses | Ties | Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kentucky | 1903 | 118 | 2,327 | 728 | 1 | .762 |
| 2 | Kansas | 1899 | 123 | 2,323 | 871 | 0 | .727 |
| 3 | North Carolina | 1911 | 111 | 2,294 | 829 | 0 | .735 |
Who honestly cares about thatWe have now been relegated to second place in all time wins. We can thank The Clown and may he his worthless tail get out of town now. In 2015 fiasco, I knew, now we have proof! Sad as hell !!
But the same amount of games over the past 100 years or so.What are you smokin' bro.
They have ~150 more games than us.
Rank College First
SeasonSeasons Wins Losses Ties Win% 1 Kentucky 1903 118 2,327 728 1 .762 2 Kansas 1899 123 2,323 871 0 .727 3 North Carolina 1911 111 2,294 829 0 .735
The 'all time wins' record, which we were discussing KU overtaking us in, includes ALL seasons not just what span you're talking about....But the same amount of games over the past 100 years or so.
You are one hopeless SOB bro, this isn't up for debate. The thread is about the all time win record. That includes, oddly enough if you believe it, all the wins, over all the years. They have more years than us and a whole lot more chances to win games. The last 100 years makes zero difference in an 'all time' record, you know, hence the 'all time' portion of it.You are clearly missing the point lol.
Loser programs point to distinguishing markers while champions bring home titles, records, and accomplishments.You are one hopeless SOB bro, this isn't up for debate. The thread is about the all time win record. That includes, oddly enough if you believe it, all the wins, over all the years. They have more years than us and a whole lot more chances to win games. The last 100 years makes zero difference in an 'all time' record, you know, hence the 'all time' portion of it.
Oh so Kansas didn’t have 150 more games played than UK when Cal took over in 2009? Of course they did and UK was still up by 18 wins on them. Calipari is 19 games behind Kansas during his tenure here.What are you smokin' bro.
They have ~150 more games than us.
Rank College First
SeasonSeasons Wins Losses Ties Win% 1 Kentucky 1903 118 2,327 728 1 .762 2 Kansas 1899 123 2,323 871 0 .727 3 North Carolina 1911 111 2,294 829 0 .735
I know who doesn’t care JVC aka CcCWho cares
Which is fine if they want to do that, but you have to use critical thinking when comparing things, pay attention to nuance and such. If the general populace and sports writer don't want to consider that, I don't really care, just more people to ignore, as without context their opinions are worthless.Loser programs point to distinguishing markers while champions bring home titles, records, and accomplishments.
If you want to point out the nuance of the Kansas/UK debate, that's fine, but there will only be a few people nationally that even attempt to follow that stream of thinking. Most will merely look at the fact that Kansas has passed us and is now #1 in wins.
Are you brain dead? This thread is about us losing the wins lead. We initially took the lead decades ago. We didn’t lose the lead because of Kansas starting 10 years, or whatever, before us. We lost the lead because of what’s going on now. Because we went 9-16 last year. Because we haven’t won an NCAA tourney game in three years. The problem isn’t 1893. The problem is now. You’re just another excuse maker. I’m not.You are one hopeless SOB bro, this isn't up for debate. The thread is about the all time win record. That includes, oddly enough if you believe it, all the wins, over all the years. They have more years than us and a whole lot more chances to win games. The last 100 years makes zero difference in an 'all time' record, you know, hence the 'all time' portion of it.