kids who play at larger high schools on average tend to have higher ratings (more stars) than those players from smaller schools but in reality have similar skill sets. Just seems like more exposure (butts in seats, media tendency to cover larger schools vs smaller schools, etc.) equates to more stars, warranted or not
Just wondering since some of our current starters/contributors came from small schools (Perkins, Banks, Saulsberry, Lawrence, etc.) and were rated low.
Just a thought....
Just wondering since some of our current starters/contributors came from small schools (Perkins, Banks, Saulsberry, Lawrence, etc.) and were rated low.
Just a thought....
