Interesting Offensive Stats going into LSU game

PirateDawg

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2020
1,751
0
0
Total Statistics
NAMETYDSYDS/GPASSPYDS/GRUSHYDS/GTPTP/G
1. Ole Miss
1906635.331010336.67896298.6715852.67
2. Florida
1659553.00651217.001008336.0010635.33
3. Missouri
1541513.67991330.33550183.3312140.33
4. Auburn
1518506.00656218.67862287.3314247.33
5. Arkansas
1477492.33630210.00847282.3312341.00
6. Kentucky
1439479.67852284.00587195.6710836.00
7. Texas A&M
1312437.33758252.67554184.678528.33
8. Georgia
1286428.67818272.67468156.0010635.33
9. Tennessee
1266422.00597199.00669223.0012842.67
10. Alabama
1256418.67860286.67396132.0012341.00
11. Mississippi St
1219406.331083361.0013645.338829.33
12. LSU
1167389.00910303.3325785.6711036.67
13. South Carolina
1066355.33624208.00442147.337926.33
14. Vanderbilt
1061353.67625208.33436145.335016.67

<thead style="box-sizing: border-box;">
</thead><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;">
</tbody>

 

Leeshouldveflanked

All-American
Nov 12, 2016
14,591
9,725
113
Don’t come in here with Facts and Stats, the Cohenites and Leach Davidians will smote you.
 
Last edited:

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
6,280
3,024
113
Are these adjusted for strength of schedule?

I don't know that we'll look any better if they are, but the list is worthless regardless if they're not.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
60,217
31,249
113
They're probably going to look worse if you adjust them. Going into this weekend Memphis was #121, LA Tech was #124 and NC State #40 in total defense.
 

Crazy Cotton

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2012
3,856
1,614
113
Wasn't expecting AL to be that low, or FL and MO to be that high. 52 plays per game is just nuts, as is less than 17 total offensive plays per game.
 

PirateDawg

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2020
1,751
0
0
I don't think having a 40 yard edge in offense after 3 games says anything about the outcome of future games. I just thought it was an interesting statistic going into the game that we are that close. I am really concerned about the 45 ypg rushing! We are seeing 6 in the box before the snap and then only 3 rush. I would think that delaying the handoff would result in more yardage.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
15,127
5,668
113
Wasn't expecting AL to be that low, or FL and MO to be that high. 52 plays per game is just nuts, as is less than 17 total offensive plays per game.

Don't feel too stupid. I was sitting there thinking the same thing until I saw DawgatAuburn's post. I mean, we should both feel stupid. Just not too ​stupid.
 

FQDawg

Senior
May 1, 2006
3,076
618
113
I think a lot of the angst amongst the fanbase (certainly a large part of mine) is shown right here in this chart. We've supposedly got an offensive minded coach whose offense is, to put it mildly, stuck in the mud. Meanwhile, our rival school, who has had the exact same amount of time as us to install a new offense is not only humming right along without any issues but legitimately has one of the top offenses in the country. We keep hearing that it takes time to develop Leach's offense. I don't think the folks at OM are any smarter than us but they sure seemed to pick a new offense that doesn't take all that much time to develop.

I'm sure the Leach defenders will jump in to tell us all the reasons why OM is a paper tiger and we're just a few plays away from being an offensive juggernaut. But, while stats certainly don't tell the whole story in any situation, these in the original post certainly paint a bleak picture.
 
Last edited:
Sep 9, 2012
2,803
0
0
Are these adjusted for strength of schedule?

I don't know that we'll look any better if they are, but the list is worthless regardless if they're not.

Here is the strength of schedule for each SEC team to this point in the season, per Sagarin.

https://sagarin.usatoday.com/2021-2/college-football-team-ratings-2021/

Alabama- 43
Georgia- 20
AM- 88
OM- 101
Florida- 39
Auburn- 202 (Akron and Alabama State suuuck)
LSU- 90
Arkansas- 132
MSU- 31
Kentucky- 155
Missouri- 102
Tennessee- 204
South Carolina- 58
Vanderbilt- 80

I’m not posting this to tell you our offense has been good, because it hasn’t. This is not a defend Mike Leach post. But context has to count for something too, and we have played a relatively more difficult schedule than the teams we are being compared against. That is objectivity true.

I guarantee you there are not 9 better offenses in this league than Alabama. We’re looking at three games here, and most teams haven’t played a conference game yet.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,594
7,789
113
Here’s something to piss y’all off even more. Prior to the game, Memphis had the top ranked offense in the country.

633 yds/gm, 8.2 yds/play, 292 rushing yds/gm, 6 offensive TDs/gm

On the road, Arnett’s defense allowed 246 yds, 4.6 yds/play, 87 yds rushing, and 2 TDs

In other words, we allowed them to do about 30-40% of what they normally do, and we still lost. To an AAC team. This illustrates what is possible if Leach’s offense just continues doing what it’s been doing. It’s not enough
 

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
15,162
14,589
113
Here’s something to piss y’all off even more. Prior to the game, Memphis had the top ranked offense in the country.

633 yds/gm, 8.2 yds/play, 292 rushing yds/gm, 6 offensive TDs/gm

On the road, Arnett’s defense allowed 246 yds, 4.6 yds/play, 87 yds rushing, and 2 TDs

In other words, we allowed them to do about 30-40% of what they normally do, and we still lost. To an AAC team. This illustrates what is possible if Leach’s offense just continues doing what it’s been doing. It’s not enough

Change two plays and you can likely take 17 points off the board for Memphis. The scoop and score (our fault) and the punt return (refs fault).

So no, I'm not blaming the loss on Leach's offense.
 

pmack3641

Junior
Aug 9, 2019
506
203
43
I think we can blame the offense. They scored 17 the first half, 3rd quarter nothing even when they had a 1st and goal (should’ve kicked the FG) they came away with zero. Wasn’t till late in the fourth quarter when they ended up with 2 scores. Let’s not forget all the penalties on the offense, it cost us a 2 point conversion and at various possessions field position. So poor coaching, a stagnant offense and multiple penalties all on the offense.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
60,217
31,249
113
That's only 14 points. Doesn't matter. The offense only scored a net 22 points vs one of the worst defenses in all of college football and failed on two 2-point conversions. That's not good, and I'm being kind.
 

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,422
5,328
113
What am I supposed to get excited about with these stats? That we are damn near last in total yards and points per game?
 
Last edited:

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,422
5,328
113
Yeah, I’m genuinely confused what the OP was trying to point out. If anything, this shows exactly why people are frustrated with the offense.
 

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,422
5,328
113
Wasn't expecting AL to be that low, or FL and MO to be that high. 52 plays per game is just nuts, as is less than 17 total offensive plays per game.

We are averaging about 54 pass attempts per game and you think we are only running 29 plays per game?
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State PFF Grades from the 41-34 win over South Carolina
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Standout Stats: Mississippi State 41-34 South Carolina
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Amaree Williams' breakout impact in Mississippi State's win at South Carolina
  4. 04 Maroon and White Football "Be a Brotherhood": Mississippi State holds fast in comeback win at South Carolina
  5. 05 Maroon and White Rapid Recap: Mississippi State 41-34 South Carolina