House Intel Committee Leakers

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Maybe you'll get lucky and Trump will get to shut down all the news sources except his, wouldn't that be fun. Rubes would probably call that winning.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Maybe you'll get lucky and Trump will get to shut down all the news sources except his, wouldn't that be fun. Rubes would probably call that winning.
Maybe you will decide to be honest for once in your life and be critical of people with a d beside their name who break the law.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I saw it on The Hill. Conspiracy minded nutjob.

The copies of the texts had been sent by a law firm to the staff of the House Intelligence Committee, he says, and the staffers quickly realized they didn’t want to start snooping in the communications of their Senate counterparts. “No member [of the committee] looked at them. The staff looked at them and said, ‘We don’t want to have anything to do with this.’” He said the documents were sent back to the law firm.

If a law firm had them, who knows who leaked them.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
The copies of the texts had been sent by a law firm to the staff of the House Intelligence Committee, he says, and the staffers quickly realized they didn’t want to start snooping in the communications of their Senate counterparts. “No member [of the committee] looked at them. The staff looked at them and said, ‘We don’t want to have anything to do with this.’” He said the documents were sent back to the law firm.

If a law firm had them, who knows who leaked them.
Well Fox claimed it was from a "Republican source" and Nunes has never denied it. It's not rocket science.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Well Fox claimed it was from a "Republican source" and Nunes has never denied it. It's not rocket science.

Wrong. You didn't read the article. At all.

The New York Times reported March 1 that Warner and the Senate panel chairman, Richard Burr of North Carolina, had met with House speaker Paul Ryan in February to complain about Nunes, blaming Nunes for the leak. But after the Times report came out, Burr told CNN’s Manu Raju that much of the paper’s account was flat wrong. He denied that the Senate Intelligence Committee had concluded that Nunes or House Republicans were behind the leak of the Warner texts. He also denied that they he and Warner had raised their concerns with Ryan. “We met with Speaker Ryan to update him on our investigation,” Burr told Raju. “That was it.”

“We’re not investigating Warner, we don’t give a sh** about him,” Nunes tells me. The copies of the texts had been sent by a law firm to the staff of the House Intelligence Committee, he says, and the staffers quickly realized they didn’t want to start snooping in the communications of their Senate counterparts. “No member [of the committee] looked at them. The staff looked at them and said, ‘We don’t want to have anything to do with this.’” He said the documents were sent back to the law firm.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Wrong. You didn't read the article. At all.

The New York Times reported March 1 that Warner and the Senate panel chairman, Richard Burr of North Carolina, had met with House speaker Paul Ryan in February to complain about Nunes, blaming Nunes for the leak. But after the Times report came out, Burr told CNN’s Manu Raju that much of the paper’s account was flat wrong. He denied that the Senate Intelligence Committee had concluded that Nunes or House Republicans were behind the leak of the Warner texts. He also denied that they he and Warner had raised their concerns with Ryan. “We met with Speaker Ryan to update him on our investigation,” Burr told Raju. “That was it.”

“We’re not investigating Warner, we don’t give a sh** about him,” Nunes tells me. The copies of the texts had been sent by a law firm to the staff of the House Intelligence Committee, he says, and the staffers quickly realized they didn’t want to start snooping in the communications of their Senate counterparts. “No member [of the committee] looked at them. The staff looked at them and said, ‘We don’t want to have anything to do with this.’” He said the documents were sent back to the law firm.
I'm not wrong, but no I did not read the Federalist article. None of what you posted refutes Fox saying they received it from a "Republican source" and nothing that you posted is Nunes denying that he (or more likely his staff) leaked it.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
I'm not wrong, but no I did not read the Federalist article. None of what you posted refutes Fox saying they received it from a "Republican source" and nothing that you posted is Nunes denying that he (or more likely his staff) leaked it.
I guess his denial was not a denial. Gotcha.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Maybe you will decide to be honest for once in your life and be critical of people with a d beside their name who break the law.
If ya break the law and they have enough evidence that you did, you go to jail, whether I criticize them or not. I'm not the one defending someone who gets a former team member indicted every other week, that'd be you.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
If ya break the law and they have enough evidence that you did, you go to jail, whether I criticize them or not. I'm not the one defending someone who gets a former team member indicted every other week, that'd be you.

Your AG has been the only one ever found in contempt of Congress. I don't trust the 7th floor until it gets cleaned out, and it's not yet.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Your AG has been the only one ever found in contempt of Congress. I don't trust the 7th floor until it gets cleaned out, and it's not yet.
lmfao, call me when they finally have enough "evidence" to prosecute "my" AG, why on earth wouldn't they have? Thankfully the law doesn't work on who or what you trust. You'd think the current AG and DOJ was mine too!