He thinks Satt is a great TE and run game guy. Dana used the word cool to refer to them working together. Also NU isn’t going to become an Air Raid team, and that TEs are going to be important.
Holgerson on Satt
- Thread starter inWV
- Start date
He said not a 4 WR set air raid team…
But DH is still running the air raid, that’s what he does. Just with 3 WR and a TE.
We will be in good shape this Fall
But DH is still running the air raid, that’s what he does. Just with 3 WR and a TE.
We will be in good shape this Fall
Yep there are many different concepts of the air raid. Everyone assumes air raid is WR spread and chuck the ball all over the place.
For sure, air raid had evolved. You are right most picture what it was 30 years ago when it was a new concept. It’s not 1997 with Justin Coleman at UNK putting up 64 passes in a game type of offense.
Satterfield is a loser who should be nowhere close to this program
The fact Rhule is forcing Dana to answer questions about an incompetent moron who is cashing bigger checks than him every two weeks despite failing miserably at his job is insane
The fact Rhule is forcing Dana to answer questions about an incompetent moron who is cashing bigger checks than him every two weeks despite failing miserably at his job is insane
Dana had full control. He could have kicked Satt to the curb. Another post that shows you as a total Piece of garbage
Satterfield is a f*cking loser. He’s never run the ball for ****. Ever.
Dana doesn’t have complete control - only the simplest of dipshits truly believes that.
On brand for you, dickbreath
yeah, Satt is untouchable when it comes to Matt Rhule.
Dana also knows this..
If you asked any husker coach how another husker coach is doing, what do people think they are gonna say?
It's not like they are going to talk ****.. in fact the opposite.. they will have so much praise for that coach, it will be like buttering up your buthole level of praise. And isn't that sort of what we got?
None of that crap means anything.. what matters is W's next fall
Given that he appears to be a good TE coach and by all accounts works well with Donnie Raiola and Holgerson, I’d say keep him on the books.
I would say if he’s a good enough TE coach you don’t throw money away firing him but I’m interested in Kongs opinion.
I’m just going by what Holgerson and Rhule have said in public about Satt. The guy is not a B1G caliber OC, but he can apparently coach TEs, and his experience as a coordinator serves the overall in terms of game planning. I see his demotion from OC and retention for the TEs plus getting Holgerson as OC as a win win.
man, hate to agree with you @king_kong_ but i would place money on their being a lot of truth to this
Will Satterfield be retained when his contract expires after this season? Certainly not at the same rate. Which is why it’s kind of weird that he is still here. The alternative of finding a worthy TE coach without awkward overtones for a mere 300-400K-ish out of the pocketbook would seem to be a fine option. Which is why it’s weird that he is still here.
Dana said something interesting in his presser talking about Satt . He said he is a good TE coach and a great “Great run game “ guy .so to answer you questions about next year . I could see Satt as TE/ run game coordinator. Wich increase his salary by 200k or so to get him at a respectable amount. Obviously not an OC amount like he was making but respectable.we will find out at seasons end.
Satt absolutely deserved to be fired, but he wasn't. Too bad. Doesn't mean it can't work out. He's not calling plays and that's all I GAF about. I'm not gonna agree with everything Rhule does but I don't get the hate for the man. We're in better position to win next year than we've been in a long time. And... I'm excited as a Mfer about our TE's.
I’d rather listen to what inWV has to say, we’ve already heard a thousand times over what he thinks of Satt not that I don’t disagree with him but I’m willing to see how it works out with Satt coaching the TE.
Make no mistake Dana is running this offense..
Satt being a “ great run game guy” doesn’t make sense given his all out refusal to run the ball last year.
The situation does not appear awkward to the other coaches or players. There does seem to be a weird hatred of Satt coming from a small slice of the fanbase.
I'm not sure they hate Sat. They or WE just hate how bad of an offensive coordinator he was. I don't think it's more than that. At least not with me it isn't
Holla
I don't hate Satt. Never met the man. I don't know how good of a coach he is. He was te coach who had a subpar group or didn't use them right. He was OC who wasn't a good OC or didn't use the personnel right. Since he was OC and his position group wasn't producing the greatest, what do we make of this? Changed OC and his position group got better production from players previously not starting, 1 transfers and 1 puts up testing numbers at the combine that were near freakish for the way he played here.
How should we feel
Dana doesn’t strike me as the type of guy to take a job working with people he thinks aren’t up to snuff. Especially at this point in his career. Like nah, I’m good. Satt will get one year to show his worth or find ‘another opportunity’.
Yep. Then we could have laid out tens of thousands more to replace him as TE coach......
We're paying Satt one way or another. It appears clear that he wasn't a good game day coach. He may be great during the week. Having him as a former OC as our TE coach is probably a benefit. We're paying him one way or another and as long as Dana can work with him we should have no problem with it. We basically almost completely overhauled our skill position coaching on offense with virtually no disruption. I think that's a good thing. I don't get the hate for the man. It's juvenile.I don't hate Satt. Never met the man. I don't know how good of a coach he is. He was te coach who had a subpar group or didn't use them right. He was OC who wasn't a good OC or didn't use the personnel right. Since he was OC and his position group wasn't producing the greatest, what do we make of this? Changed OC and his position group got better production from players previously not starting, 1 transfers and 1 puts up testing numbers at the combine that were near freakish for the way he played here.
How should we feel
Hey I understand we're stuck with him and his salary for this year. Like I said I don't hate him since I have never met him.
But after this year and every contract year, do we have the right person for the right job. This business of college football has gotten crazy and we need to realize that
