Hitched to a QB . . .

BobVH5150

Junior
Jul 9, 2025
208
315
63
Callahan to Keller. Pelini to TMart. Frost to AMart. Rhule to Dylan. Till the wheels fall off.

And every single one of those guys was hurt, and they kept getting sent out there after ineffectiveness and injury was obvious.

It's a cycle where the end is known. And the end is hopefully at 7-5 this year.
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
Callahan to Keller. Pelini to TMart. Frost to AMart. Rhule to Dylan. Till the wheels fall off.

And every single one of those guys was hurt, and they kept getting sent out there after ineffectiveness and injury was obvious.

It's a cycle where the end is known. And the end is hopefully at 7-5 this year.
Not including the bowl last year, over the last 2+seasons, NU is 3-10 in the second half of the season(s).
A repeat of the first two years, equates to a 7-5 season.
 

BugsAreQualityProtein

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2021
2,556
1,201
103
It’s a choice that these coaches make for no reason other than blind loyalty or stubbornness.

After the last three games I would say regardless of circumstances Raiola’s stock has dropped. In last night’s game he wasn’t just inconsistent, he was ineffective. His best plays were impromptu, backyard middle school plays.
 

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
We had a lot of issues last night. Riaola wasn’t great. But he’s pretty far down the list of issues. People just love to blame the qb for everything. Never mind the defense couldn’t get off the field and gave up 98 and 90 yard long clock eating drives for minnesotas first two td’s. What’s the game look like if they get 3 and outs there? How about Pritchett getting ejected? Offense was moving the ball a bit when he was playing. What about Dana refusing to run the ball even when we were starting to make some yards with it? Dylan deserves some blame but he played well enough for us to have a shot if every other position group hadn’t sucked big time.
 

dm1330

Freshman
Aug 20, 2001
359
68
22
Callahan to Keller. Pelini to TMart. Frost to AMart. Rhule to Dylan. Till the wheels fall off.

And every single one of those guys was hurt, and they kept getting sent out there after ineffectiveness and injury was obvious.

It's a cycle where the end is known. And the end is hopefully at 7-5 this year.
No QB can be effective when they get sacked 9 times and threatened time and time again. Oline is horrible and has been for years. We do not have the talent there at all. Dline is mediocre at best. We do not have the Jimmy and Joes. Saban would not win with this bunch.
 

lifer56

Heisman
May 3, 2005
37,128
34,360
113
There are lotsa reasons coaches stick with the QB who has proven himself over many hours of practice and film study to be the most capable. Just one is that if the benching doesn’t work out, both the former starter and the unprepared sub are likely worse off going forward. I get the hesitancy.

This is in no way meant to disparage anyone.

That said, I don’t recall ever longing for another Tommy-Gun Armstrong spinning out of the pocket and loading up a yolo bomb like I did last night. Lol!
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,481
1,215
113
No QB can be effective when they get sacked 9 times and threatened time and time again. Oline is horrible and has been for years. We do not have the talent there at all. Dline is mediocre at best. We do not have the Jimmy and Joes. Saban would not win with this bunch.
The quarterback is a sitting duck when he has no ability to escape. No designed run plays for him. Why is that so hard to understand?. Do you really think ideal football is when the quarterback can sit back there for 5 to 7 seconds surveying the whole field? Some of you guys live in fantasyland and have never played the game.
 

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
The quarterback is a sitting duck when he has no ability to escape. No designed run plays for him. Why is that so hard to understand?. Do you really think ideal football is when the quarterback can sit back there for 5 to 7 seconds surveying the whole field? Some of you guys live in fantasyland and have never played the game.
Plenty of teams win with drop back qb’s. Only Nebraska fans think any qb that can’t run sucks. If you can run the ball and pass protect, the qb doesn’t need to run. Why do we blame the qb when all we need is an oline? Stop blaming the qb for other position groups sucking.
 
Sep 7, 2018
1,079
346
83
Something has to change for Dylan to realize his potential. Either he transfers to another school that can field a competent OL to protect him and allow him to perform in an offense that fits his skills, or the other Raiola needs to leave and Rhule needs bring in a coach that can make that happen here. The family dynamics of this situation are pretty interesting when you put aside that NU's season is hanging in the balance on the issue.
 

Zeke Husker

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2025
1,348
1,373
113
Plenty of teams win with drop back qb’s. Only Nebraska fans think any qb that can’t run sucks. If you can run the ball and pass protect, the qb doesn’t need to run. Why do we blame the qb when all we need is an oline? Stop blaming the qb for other position groups sucking.
Lots of fans wanting a qb that runs have quickly forgotten how beat up they get and those same fans whined about Adrian Martinez playing injured all the time.
 

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
Lots of fans wanting a qb that runs have quickly forgotten how beat up they get and those same fans whined about Adrian Martinez playing injured all the time.
People just want to whine when we lose. I get it. I do too. And many people only know how to blame the qb because they don’t know what they’re watching. Dylan isn’t the only immobile qb in the country that holds the ball too long but yet we’ve given up more sacks than anyone in the country. Dylan is in a bad spot. The coaches have put it on him to move the offense. We don’t even try to run most of the time to keep the defense honest. Minnesota sat in a soft zone waiting for short throws with their safeties coming down hill fast while their DE’s pinned their ears back. They were daring us to throw deep. We couldn’t protect. Yeah Dylan could step up on some of those sacks, but it’s hard for him to trust that when he had already been pressured straight up the middle many times. He’s rightfully uncomfortable in the pocket because many times there is no pocket. So he bails backwards to escape the rush. Minny was ready for it and our tackles were nothing more than telephone poles.
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,054
2,264
113
The quarterback is a sitting duck when he has no ability to escape. No designed run plays for him. Why is that so hard to understand?. Do you really think ideal football is when the quarterback can sit back there for 5 to 7 seconds surveying the whole field? Some of you guys live in fantasyland and have never played the game.
I see what you're say but somehow MN was able to figure out how to be successful without a mobile QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedMyMind2.0

Jeans_15

Junior
Jul 3, 2025
338
326
63
Plenty of teams win with drop back qb’s. Only Nebraska fans think any qb that can’t run sucks. If you can run the ball and pass protect, the qb doesn’t need to run. Why do we blame the qb when all we need is an oline? Stop blaming the qb for other position groups sucking.

Who?

Name them.

If your QB can't run your offense can easily be stopped by a decent defense.

Its not 1954 anymore
.
.
 

Jeans_15

Junior
Jul 3, 2025
338
326
63
Lots of fans wanting a qb that runs have quickly forgotten how beat up they get and those same fans whined about Adrian Martinez playing injured all the time.

To be able to run. He is no threat at all

QBs have to run in this day and age of football.

Doesn't mean you are designing runs.

You forget our only real greatness came from QBs who ran but had the ability to hit an open receiver .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeaOfRed75

Laner2

Senior
Dec 27, 2007
18,967
900
113
To be able to run. He is no threat at all

QBs have to run in this day and age of football.

Doesn't mean you are designing runs.

You forget our only real greatness came from QBs who ran but had the ability to hit an open receiver .
You mean like Minny's QB last night? Your take is the easy one but not the right one.
 

Zeke Husker

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2025
1,348
1,373
113
To be able to run. He is no threat at all

QBs have to run in this day and age of football.

Doesn't mean you are designing runs.

You forget our only real greatness came from QBs who ran but had the ability to hit an open receiver .
It’s been 24 years since Eric Crouch was here. No one since has been able to do that. I guess Adrian Martinez hit open receivers that were actually defensive backs for the other teams. So did Jeff Sims. And several others. Been one dimensional forever .
 

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
Who?

Name them.

If your QB can't run your offense can easily be stopped by a decent defense.

Its not 1954 anymore

Miami. Notre dame. USC. Alabama. Ohio state. And that’s just a quick browse of teams off the top of my head. Add Texas tech as well
 

Jeans_15

Junior
Jul 3, 2025
338
326
63
It’s been 24 years since Eric Crouch was here. No one since has been able to do that. I guess Adrian Martinez hit open receivers that were actually defensive backs for the other teams. So did Jeff Sims. And several others. Been one dimensional forever .

Again the ability to run
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeaOfRed75

Zeke Husker

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2025
1,348
1,373
113
Sayin 10 yards on the year
Simpson has 40 yards on the year
Beck has 26 yards on the year
Carr has 16 yards
Maiava has 50 yards
Morton has -2 yards

none of them are run threats. No defense is playing qb run vs them. You’re wrong.
He is very wrong. And wants to forget how crappy of passers the previous decade of qbs have been with the exception of Casey Thompson
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedMyMind2.0

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
He is very wrong. And wants to forget how crappy of passers the previous decade of qbs have been with the exception of Casey Thompson
The only legitimate argument that he/she can make but never will because it doesn’t fit their narrative is that a running qb can compensate for deficiencies else where on the roster and that Nebraska has not and cannot recruit at a high enough level to win vs good teams without a qb run threat. I don’t believe that to be true but it’s a much more rational argument than “you can’t win without a running qb in modern college football” which is plainly wrong
 

Zeke Husker

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2025
1,348
1,373
113
The only legitimate argument that he/she can make but never will because it doesn’t fit their narrative is that a running qb can compensate for deficiencies else where on the roster and that Nebraska has not and cannot recruit at a high enough level to win vs good teams without a qb run threat. I don’t believe that to be true but it’s a much more rational argument than “you can’t win without a running qb in modern college football” which is plainly wrong
That make sense but as you are aware if your only threat is when the qb takes off for a nice run on a busted play….your offense sucks. I can see how people can wrongly think that is a good thing, it’s what we lived with for several years.
 

Shimmer003

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2005
10,027
2,631
96
That make sense but as you are aware if your only threat is when the qb takes off for a nice run on a busted play….your offense sucks. I can see how people can wrongly think that is a good thing, it’s what we lived with for several years.
It can give you an added element to defend in spread option and designed run. Essentially gives you an extra blocker. That’s not my issue. My issue is they frequently get injured or play hurt and are less effective. Most of them aren’t as good in the passing game, which limits you there compared to Dylan. And the biggest issue I have is that we just need to play the guy that has the most talent, best chance to win and highest ceiling. And right now that’s Dylan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeke Husker

Zeke Husker

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2025
1,348
1,373
113
It can give you an added element to defend in spread option and designed run. Essentially gives you an extra blocker. That’s not my issue. My issue is they frequently get injured or play hurt and are less effective. Most of them aren’t as good in the passing game, which limits you there compared to Dylan. And the biggest issue I have is that we just need to play the guy that has the most talent, best chance to win and highest ceiling. And right now that’s Dylan.
For the first time in years our offense has a plan and an identity. We may not agree with what they are doing but it’s another thing many have complained about in the past. We do something different and yet again some long for the past that wasn’t very good either.
 

king_kong__

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2021
3,528
4,760
113
For the first time in years our offense has a plan and an identity. We may not agree with what they are doing but it’s another thing many have complained about in the past. We do something different and yet again some long for the past that wasn’t very good either.
We do have an identity.

it’s straight out of the AAC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dylman and WHCSC

SeaOfRed75

All-Conference
Dec 5, 2010
3,218
1,143
113
To be able to run. He is no threat at all

QBs have to run in this day and age of football.

Doesn't mean you are designing runs.

You forget our only real greatness came from QBs who ran but had the ability to hit an open receiver .
I agree with you after watching some other QBs today.

But you are being generous with the ability to hit an open receiver. Lol.