Hillary won't release the transcripts of
- Thread starter EERs 3:16
- Start date
Just a thought here, if she really didn't give a speech yet was paid for one, does that indicate some form of fraud?
And you know exactly why he cannot do so, at this time. Defense during a law suit takes precedence over campaign rhetoric by Dems.
Just showing their appreciation for her attempt to guide them down the correct path.
I believe it is only Eers suggesting no speech was given and he was only trolling.
Didn't see any articles, I don't know. Sad that it wouldn't surprise me if that turned out to be the case.
You know, every time you make reference to "Faux News" it's akin to the right referring to MSNBC and the Clinton News Network. Basically, you're no different than those you think are better than.
Both of you are in groups of people who have allowed the media and politicians influence you to allow yourself to become divided.
So, you start a topic and make an accusation, but you don't want to provide the source of this information unless somebody provides something that doesn't exist?
He didn't see it anywhere. He made it up in an effort to troll and unfortunately it worked.
Here's a serious question: you have to admit that Fox News is biased, right? They admit themselves that they have an agenda and that agenda is to slant every story to the conservative ideology.
Do you think NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC all slant their stories the left? Do you think its some leftist conspiracy? All of these mainstream stations that have been in existence from the beginning of television (except CNN) are plotting together to slant the news?
Why would somebody charge $100k's for a speech, and then turn around and give the contents of the speech away to everybody for free?
I've never claimed Fox didn't slant their news. I do in fact believe the others slant left whether it be a little or a whole lot (MSNBC) left.