Going for it on fourth down in the third quarter

Charlie Marlow

All-Conference
May 6, 2022
679
1,163
93
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.
 

RBigredMax1

All-Conference
Jul 16, 2025
1,482
2,523
113
Agreed - I’m sure they will talk about the “analytics say to go for it …🙄”.

But the D has just forced 3 and outs and a turnover the last 3 drives. Give cincy the long field and keep the momentum going.

4th and 2 on the goal line - ballsy and I liked that one (because it worked:))
 

Charlie Marlow

All-Conference
May 6, 2022
679
1,163
93
Agreed - I’m sure they will talk about the “analytics say to go for it …🙄”.

But the D has just forced 3 and outs and a turnover the last 3 drives. Give cincy the long field and keep the momentum going.

4th and 2 on the goal line - ballsy and I liked that one (because it worked:))
I liked the goal line sequence too. The 3rd down play call obviously set up the 4th down call. Bravo to Holgerson on that one.
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
Agreed - I’m sure they will talk about the “analytics say to go for it …🙄”.

But the D has just forced 3 and outs and a turnover the last 3 drives. Give cincy the long field and keep the momentum going.

4th and 2 on the goal line - ballsy and I liked that one (because it worked:))
I like that they trust the team to do it, but not when you have momentum. Keep the momentum and pin them deep. Cincinnati didn't do that well when needing to drive it.

regarding the goal line. I like going for it as they still start at the 2 and weren't driving well when forced to do run the whole field.
 

SuperBigFan69

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2021
4,622
4,215
113
It is one of those things where if it works, you are smart and if it doesn't, you are dumb.

Had they punted and pinned them at the 10...and Cincy drove 90 yards for a TD...it would have been BRUTAL too.

I don't want to turn into lame *** iowa where they punt on 4th and inches at the 40 yard line. But I also don't want to lose games with bad choices.

In the end, I just hope whatever they do call ends up working!
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
It is one of those things where if it works, you are smart and if it doesn't, you are dumb.

Had they punted and pinned them at the 10...and Cincy drove 90 yards for a TD...it would have been BRUTAL too.

I don't want to turn into lame *** iowa where they punt on 4th and inches at the 40 yard line. But I also don't want to lose games with bad choices.

In the end, I just hope whatever they do call ends up working!
They had the first down with Johnson if he gets it to him right away. There is a bit of solace in the fact that the play should have worked, I guess.
 
Jan 31, 2007
558
410
57
The handoff exchange was too slow all night!! It’s as if Raiola is running zone read and might pull it and go?? They need the ball to RB faster.
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
The handoff exchange was too slow all night!! It’s as if Raiola is running zone read and might pull it and go?? They need the ball to RB faster.
That delayed handoff is pretty common now in the RPO. In theory it should keep the defense a bit on its toes instead of attacking if there is a semblance of a pass or qb run game out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldOzzyLvr

tro80

Senior
Nov 17, 2014
1,037
532
106
If you punt, and they have to go 90 yards instead of 50 some, that's probably another minute or two off the clock. And our last drive starts with 5-6 minutes on the clock after they scored instead of 7minutes. Punt and let the defense start with them deep instead of at their 40-45 yard line. I get it if you make the first down, game might be as good as over. But too much time left IMO to go for it their.
 

BadgerPete

Junior
Dec 22, 2013
1,063
276
83
I liked the goal line sequence too. The 3rd down play call obviously set up the 4th down call. Bravo to Holgerson on that one.
No question about the "set up". Brilliant! HH went in motion just like on 3rd down and the linebackers were sucked in to stop the run. Sharp pass by DR!
 

Pennsyhuskers

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2022
612
1,832
93
Going for it on 4th and 2 is not the same as Frost’s onside kick. Our short passing game had been working. The odds of us making 4th and 2 were exponentially higher than the odds of recovering an onside kick. Onside kicks have a very low percentage of success.
 
Aug 28, 2025
357
395
63
Love going for it there actually, hate the play call though. There needs to be a reliable 2 yard run in the playbook, whether that means getting HH involved or not, it’s going to be the difference between a win and a loss this year.
 

inthedeed

Junior
Mar 28, 2009
6,923
315
83
ignorant call. 4th and 2 and fail. not only give the ball up(1) with field position(2) and change the momentum(3) let alone the 4th quarter clock management considerations(4).
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
Going for it on 4th and 2 is not the same as Frost’s onside kick. Our short passing game had been working. The odds of us making 4th and 2 were exponentially higher than the odds of recovering an onside kick. Onside kicks have a very low percentage of success.
That's fine, but in the aspect of screwing up your own momentum it is the same. Do I hate going for it? No, but your punter had been pinning them deep and they had been struggling to move it out of their own end zone. Don't give them a boost for no reason. Last year when our special teams were terrible, I'd go without question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennsyhuskers

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,080
2,290
113
I actually liked the call to go for it and the play call itself. It was a tough play, but we had guys open to make it work.

DR was just a tad late seeing the open guys, but give credit to Cincy for quickly recovering and not giving DR a lot of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldOzzyLvr

Nuts McClanahan

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2022
1,092
1,110
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.
I'm sure that was MR's decision. One thing to add to the conversation moving forward is that new punter is a weapon we haven't had. That kid is better at pinning people deep. At midfield, that kid could punt. He could run and punt. Or just keep it and run. He could run and pass. The kid is also a good passer. That dude has been playing Australian rules football his whole life. That's all they do is that ****.
 

cestrup

All-Conference
Sep 23, 2021
3,073
1,228
113
I think DR needs work on his pre snap reads and hot routes. Hes young so im sure it’s a process
 

Rufus Barchetta

Heisman
Aug 29, 2003
21,351
12,649
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.

Hindsight makes everyone right.
 

rez dog 70

Heisman
Sep 11, 2011
156,742
37,163
113
It is one of those things where if it works, you are smart and if it doesn't, you are dumb.

Had they punted and pinned them at the 10...and Cincy drove 90 yards for a TD...it would have been BRUTAL too.

I don't want to turn into lame *** iowa where they punt on 4th and inches at the 40 yard line. But I also don't want to lose games with bad choices.

In the end, I just hope whatever they do call ends up working!
+1
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

Big bo fan

All-American
Jan 8, 2019
19,177
6,459
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.
Rhule said in his presser that Dylan checked into another play and everyone didn’t get it . He said the original play was likely a conversation. That’s a mistake Dylan can’t have on 4th down.
 

orclover11

Senior
Dec 1, 2014
1,166
837
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.
This is the importance of lucking into a win against a bad team...we gave up 7 ypc, and cin continued to throw the ball and throw picks because they suck. They were in field goal range to go to OT but their *** qb decided to throw into double coverage. If they beat us, that go for it decision would go down as stupid as Frost and people would be wanting Rhule's head by October. Just win baby.
 

orclover11

Senior
Dec 1, 2014
1,166
837
113
Hindsight makes everyone right.
Not this board...we have been terrible for a decade and people were still calling for 10+ wins, and are "surprised" we didn't look great against a juggernaut like Cincinnati. Now in hindsight, people are saying that Cincinnati might be the best front 7 we see all year. They are tough. Lol
 

Huskers12345

Senior
Aug 23, 2025
689
776
93
This is the importance of lucking into a win against a bad team...we gave up 7 ypc, and cin continued to throw the ball and throw picks because they suck. They were in field goal range to go to OT but their *** qb decided to throw into double coverage. If they beat us, that go for it decision would go down as stupid as Frost and people would be wanting Rhule's head by October. Just win baby.
You wanted them to drive 91 yards in 2:10 by running? Without running out the clock? They were out of timeouts with 2 minutes left. Do you have even a basic understanding of football?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

Huskers12345

Senior
Aug 23, 2025
689
776
93
Not this board...we have been terrible for a decade and people were still calling for 10+ wins, and are "surprised" we didn't look great against a juggernaut like Cincinnati. Now in hindsight, people are saying that Cincinnati might be the best front 7 we see all year. They are tough. Lol
You must have missed my other post. Can you post a pic of the stadium right after kickoff Saturday since you live so close?
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,469
12,872
78
I'm just confused because the game plan seemed so vanilla and conservative.
The game plan was greatly affected by what Cinci was doing on defense. They were keeping everything in front of them and playing a lot of zone with 3 safeties. Their DTs are very good players.
 

HUSKERFAN66

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2004
21,224
3,567
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.
I don't know how it REALLY WORKS, but Rhule did say last year he has final veto power on plays. Insinuating I'm the head coach making the big money with the contract, throw the darts at me.

That takes a lot of time on the play clock which has been shortened. Honestly I don't know the answer to your question but I can see him saying let's go give me your best play.... and you've got 3 seconds to respond
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,387
15,528
113
I didn’t like going for it there. Our D had been playing well so why gift the other team great field position in that situation? It wasn’t as bad as Frost’s onside kick but it was in a similar vein.

So who is responsible for that, DH or MR? I know Dana calls the plays but doesn’t Rhule actually decide to go for it there? I’ve never been impressed with his in-game coaching and had hope the new coordinators would help him out there.

That one didn't bother me. I didn't care for the one we scored the TD on lol. Crazy how that works.



Holla
 

anon1765477286

Sophomore
Sep 24, 2017
712
166
43
Had no problem with it.

Only play call I didn't like was the end around to Barney on the last drive, we were moving it fairly well between the tackles and with the pitch to Barney instead of handoff I just felt it was a bad call at that time. Though Barney almost broke one earlier.

Wouldn't be surprised if it was Holgorson that made the decision to go for it though and not Rhule.