Honestly disappointed but is what it is. Either next man up or portal.oh well
Why would you tell them that at this point?Some of these guys are being told they’re going to have to fight for playing time next year.
We’re going to have to cut some guys and they might like the potential of young guys better. I believe we had freshman taking snaps from Gbayor already. He might of thought the handwriting was on the wall for his playing time.Why would you tell them that at this point?
Pretty crazy for anyone to think anything worthwhile in life is obtained easily. Heck yeah you gotta compete for itSome of these guys are being told they’re going to have to fight for playing time next year.
This is excuse is so tiring. If a few guys can dismantle 100 guys then how soft are the newbies? In 2 years when DR is gone and we’re fighting for 5 or 6 wins it’ll be Rhule’s kids mentality for the 5th time in the past 20 years. Yawn!!This is probably a good thing. He is a holdover from the full on losing mentality. I've said this for weeks that we need most of the Frost era guys out of here. They bring losing and we need to rid the program of that.
Whatever. If those are your so called leaders and all they've done is wilt, I don't want those guys anywhere near the guys who actually know how to win. Agree to disagree, but Rhule should have flipped the roster when he first got here and built it like he did at other stops by playing a ton of youngsters and getting them reps. Continuing to play guys who didn't accomplish anything before didn't do us any favors. Yeah, there are a few outliers, but that is about it.This is excuse is so tiring. If a few guys can dismantle 100 guys then how soft are the newbies? In 2 years when DR is gone and we’re fighting for 5 or 6 wins it’ll be Rhule’s kids mentality for the 5th time in the past 20 years. Yawn!!
Agreed, it's so weird attacking our own, and kids who have worked their asses off and earned significant playing time. If these "fans" think winning is going to happen without a significant amount of senior leadership, they are very wrong. And then what do you know, the next group of underclassmen grow up to be losers and repeat the cycle. I'm not losing sleep over losing Gbayor, but it's definitely not a net positive type of player to be transferring out.This is excuse is so tiring. If a few guys can dismantle 100 guys then how soft are the newbies? In 2 years when DR is gone and we’re fighting for 5 or 6 wins it’ll be Rhule’s kids mentality for the 5th time in the past 20 years. Yawn!!
Why do you want seniors to lead you that suck? I mean seriously. The same thing in business. You want leaders who are good at what they do, not guys who love to talk that never produce and are the ones making the mistakes. Results on the field are the only thing that matter and most of our "older" guys haven't had many results. I'll take my chances at trying to make future leaders who might achieve something. Nash & Ty earned that right. Most others didn't.Agreed, it's so weird attacking our own, and kids who have worked their asses off and earned significant playing time. If these "fans" think winning is going to happen without a significant amount of senior leadership, they are very wrong. And then what do you know, the next group of underclassmen grow up to be losers and repeat the cycle. I'm not losing sleep over losing Gbayor, but it's definitely not a net positive type of player to be transferring out.
Our recruiting needs to pick up tremendously to have a roster full of Ty Robinsons. In the current state of Nebraska football, that is nothing but a pipedream. Since I'm not in the business of wishful thinking, losing contributors who have started double digit games for us is a net loss. Teams that outperform their talent level tend to have a lot of upperclassmen contributors. That's not really a coincidence.Why do you want seniors to lead you that suck? I mean seriously. The same thing in business. You want leaders who are good at what they do, not guys who love to talk that never produce and are the ones making the mistakes. Results on the field are the only thing that matter and most of our "older" guys haven't had many results. I'll take my chances at trying to make future leaders who might achieve something. Nash & Ty earned that right. Most others didn't.
But think about what you are saying. What would happen to all the younger guys with no experience you throw to the wolves? Theyd lose. So you are back to the problem you think you are solving and have a bunch of guys who “didnt accomplish anything”.Whatever. If those are your so called leaders and all they've done is wilt, I don't want those guys anywhere near the guys who actually know how to win. Agree to disagree, but Rhule should have flipped the roster when he first got here and built it like he did at other stops by playing a ton of youngsters and getting them reps. Continuing to play guys who didn't accomplish anything before didn't do us any favors. Yeah, there are a few outliers, but that is about it.
Would they lose? We don't know that. I will agree that you need a little bit of a mix, but where Rhule really ****** up was not just cutting all of the dead weight when he first came in. When you inherit a losing mentality you need to cut most of that fat out. That is what made him successful at other stops. He played a ton of young guys at Baylor and SOB they started to win games. I'd much rather see a young guy figure it out over trotting guys like Gifford out there who continue to do nothing for the program. He should have kept guys like Nash & Ty and maybe a few others, but most of those guys should have been processed.But think about what you are saying. What would happen to all the younger guys with no experience you throw to the wolves? Theyd lose. So you are back to the problem you think you are solving and have a bunch of guys who “didnt accomplish anything”.
Its actually not difficult to flip the mentality of players. Happens all the time, and the ones who dont get left behind. I mean practice habits and work ethic, being coachable, etc.
The one thing that is hard to change is expecting to lose in very close games. That one is tough. But I dont think just playing a bunch of youngsters fixes that, especially if they arent ready, if you get what Im saying.
This is the reality$$$$$ It’s pro football now. We need to buy someone better.
You can really ruin young guys if they arent ready.Would they lose? We don't know that. I will agree that you need a little bit of a mix, but where Rhule really ****ed up was not just cutting all of the dead weight when he first came in. When you inherit a losing mentality you need to cut most of that fat out. That is what made him successful at other stops. He played a ton of young guys at Baylor and SOB they started to win games. I'd much rather see a young guy figure it out over trotting guys like Gifford out there who continue to do nothing for the program. He should have kept guys like Nash & Ty and maybe a few others, but most of those guys should have been processed.
It isn't easy whatsoever, but Rhule went about it in the wrong way in my opinion. In year 1 he had all of the grace in the world. We could have won, 1 game, but if you saw progression and we played a ton of young guys there would be reason for optimism. Instead he went a different route and now we are in a ****** position. I like that Rhule is trying to change, but he royally miscalculated what the CFB landscape was going to look like and was caught with his pants down. If NU wants to be good they are going to need to act like a big boy and go buy players and indirectly tamper like all of the other schools do. The days of NU so called doing things the "right way" should be over. Go start buying studs and compliment them with your perceived notion that you are good with developing players.You can really ruin young guys if they arent ready.
I get what you are saying and I agree regarding a few guys, but you are making it sound easier to do than it actually is
You did it again. If we play young guys and they win 1 game, then the next season you have a bunch of players who have never done anything and are losers, right? Do you see that this would not fix the very problem you are complaining about?It isn't easy whatsoever, but Rhule went about it in the wrong way in my opinion. In year 1 he had all of the grace in the world. We could have won, 1 game, but if you saw progression and we played a ton of young guys there would be reason for optimism. Instead he went a different route and now we are in a ****** position. I like that Rhule is trying to change, but he royally miscalculated what the CFB landscape was going to look like and was caught with his pants down. If NU wants to be good they are going to need to act like a big boy and go buy players and indirectly tamper like all of the other schools do. The days of NU so called doing things the "right way" should be over. Go start buying studs and compliment them with your perceived notion that you are good with developing players.
I want more suh typesOur recruiting needs to pick up tremendously to have a roster full of Ty Robinsons. In the current state of Nebraska football, that is nothing but a pipedream. Since I'm not in the business of wishful thinking, losing contributors who have started double digit games for us is a net loss. Teams that outperform their talent level tend to have a lot of upperclassmen contributors. That's not really a coincidence.