Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Manster" data-source="post: 130091992" data-attributes="member: 1088678">I thought we hurt ourselves in Waco when, in the 4th, we rushed only 3 and dropped 8.&nbsp; The kid had too much time and picked us apart.&nbsp; I think we can agree we have average talent on D (or maybe decent talent that is inexperienced).&nbsp; Given that, I like our chances best when we play with aggressively and with reckless abandon.&nbsp; I kept yelling to heat that backup QB up last night as it was clear our secondary couldn't cover for 4+ seconds.Anyway, I fear even worse if we let Rudolph sit in a pocket and scan the field.&nbsp; He and those receivers will kill us.So, lets &quot;release the hounds&quot; and try to make him as uncomfortable as possible.&nbsp; Means we have to put our CB's on an island and I realize that doesn't sound like a good idea.&nbsp; But, I just think giving Rudolph time is even worse.&nbsp; If we're going to go down, lets go down swinging.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Manster, post: 130091992, member: 1088678"] I thought we hurt ourselves in Waco when, in the 4th, we rushed only 3 and dropped 8. The kid had too much time and picked us apart. I think we can agree we have average talent on D (or maybe decent talent that is inexperienced). Given that, I like our chances best when we play with aggressively and with reckless abandon. I kept yelling to heat that backup QB up last night as it was clear our secondary couldn't cover for 4+ seconds. Anyway, I fear even worse if we let Rudolph sit in a pocket and scan the field. He and those receivers will kill us. So, lets "release the hounds" and try to make him as uncomfortable as possible. Means we have to put our CB's on an island and I realize that doesn't sound like a good idea. But, I just think giving Rudolph time is even worse. If we're going to go down, lets go down swinging. [/QUOTE]

Name