Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Rivals300
Team Recruiting Rankings
CFB Player Rankings
Prediction Machine
Transfer Portal
True freshmen who could start Week 1 of 2026 college football season
The Game After The Game: Which back-to-backs could be backbreakers in the 2026 college football season?
Indiana's Tyrique Tucker ready to do it all over again with his late mom watching from above
2026 Big Ten College Football Preview: CFP favorites, power rankings, more
Preseason Big Ten Football Poll released by Cleveland.com
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Fire Dana...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WiiWii" data-source="post: 129384851" data-attributes="member: 1347767"><p>Well, Vernon, you are certainly in a bad mood since Saturday. I can understand that. Since you keep bringing up how recruiting is so much better, I thought that I would run some numbers. This is all based upon the Rivals recruit ratings and we all know that these have lots of flaws, but it is the best that we have right now and, I think over time, the errors wash themselves out and this is a valid analysis.</p><p></p><p> wVu Big East</p><p>2002: 2.3 1.72</p><p>2003: 2.52 1.99</p><p>2004: 2.38 1.68</p><p>2005: 2.48 1.84</p><p>2006: 2.63 1.94 </p><p>2007: 2.96 2.05</p><p>2008: 2.52 1.98</p><p>______________________________________Joined Big 12</p><p></p><p> wVu B12</p><p></p><p>2009: 3.08 3.00</p><p>2010: 3.15 3.16</p><p>2011: 2.95 3.09</p><p>2012: 2.93 3.05</p><p>2013: 2.96 2.95</p><p>2014: 2.95 2.86</p><p>2015: 3.1 2.91</p><p></p><p>Average 2005 - 2008: 2.65</p><p>Average since 2009: 3.02 (did not count 2016 because the class is not complete yet)</p><p></p><p>So, yes, our recruiting has improved...marginally. A 14% improvement to be precise.</p><p></p><p>HOWEVER, now lets look at how we compared to our conference mates in both of these periods:</p><p></p><p>From 2002 - 2008: We averaged 2.54 compared to an average of 1.88. <strong>So we averaged 35% better star ratings than the other teams in the Big East conference.</strong></p><p></p><p>From 2009 - 2015: We averaged 3.02 compared to an average of 3.00. <strong>So we averaged 0% better star ratings than the other teams in the Big 12 conference.</strong> In fact, we are very close to the average for the conference.</p><p></p><p>So, Vernon, to use your own logic, we had significantly better than average "Big East" players when we played in the Big East and, now that we are in the Big 12, although it appears true that our recruiting has improved some, our players are essentially average as compared to the players on the other teams in the Big 12 conference.</p><p></p><p>So, no, it is NOT all coaching....I wish it were not true, btw, because coaching is easier to fix.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WiiWii, post: 129384851, member: 1347767"] Well, Vernon, you are certainly in a bad mood since Saturday. I can understand that. Since you keep bringing up how recruiting is so much better, I thought that I would run some numbers. This is all based upon the Rivals recruit ratings and we all know that these have lots of flaws, but it is the best that we have right now and, I think over time, the errors wash themselves out and this is a valid analysis. wVu Big East 2002: 2.3 1.72 2003: 2.52 1.99 2004: 2.38 1.68 2005: 2.48 1.84 2006: 2.63 1.94 2007: 2.96 2.05 2008: 2.52 1.98 ______________________________________Joined Big 12 wVu B12 2009: 3.08 3.00 2010: 3.15 3.16 2011: 2.95 3.09 2012: 2.93 3.05 2013: 2.96 2.95 2014: 2.95 2.86 2015: 3.1 2.91 Average 2005 - 2008: 2.65 Average since 2009: 3.02 (did not count 2016 because the class is not complete yet) So, yes, our recruiting has improved...marginally. A 14% improvement to be precise. HOWEVER, now lets look at how we compared to our conference mates in both of these periods: From 2002 - 2008: We averaged 2.54 compared to an average of 1.88. [B]So we averaged 35% better star ratings than the other teams in the Big East conference.[/B] From 2009 - 2015: We averaged 3.02 compared to an average of 3.00. [B]So we averaged 0% better star ratings than the other teams in the Big 12 conference.[/B] In fact, we are very close to the average for the conference. So, Vernon, to use your own logic, we had significantly better than average "Big East" players when we played in the Big East and, now that we are in the Big 12, although it appears true that our recruiting has improved some, our players are essentially average as compared to the players on the other teams in the Big 12 conference. So, no, it is NOT all coaching....I wish it were not true, btw, because coaching is easier to fix. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Fire Dana...
Top
Bottom